Reasons Why Geomagnetic Field Generation is Physically Impossible in Earth’s Fluid Core

Authors

  • J. Marvin Herndon Transdyne Corporation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10184

Keywords:

Corona ejections; Magnetic reversals; Geomagnetic storms; Geomagnetic collapse; Solar wind; Super volcano; Communications disruption; Inner core; Convection.

Abstract

Despite the importance for understanding the nature of the geomagnetic field, and especially its potential for radically disrupting modern civilization [1], virtually all scientific publications relating to it are based upon the false assumption that the geomagnetic field is generated in the Earth’s fluid core. By adhering to an outmoded paradigm, members of the geoscience community have potentially exposed humanity to globally devastating risks, leaving it unprepared for an inevitable geomagnetic field collapse.

There is no scientific reason to believe that the geomagnetic field is generated within the fluid core. Convection is physically impossible in the fluid core due to its compression by the weight above and its inability to sustain an adverse temperature gradient. There is no evidence of ongoing inner core growth to provide energy to drive thermal convection or to cause compositional convection. Moreover, there is no mechanism to account for magnetic reversals and no means for magnetic seed-field production within the fluid core to initiate dynamo amplification.

Earth’s nuclear georeactor, seat of the geomagnetic field, has none of the problems inherent in putative fluid-core geomagnetic field production. With a mass of about one ten-millionth that of the fluid core, georeactor sub-shell convection can potentially be disrupted by great planetary trauma, such as an asteroid impact, or by major solar outbursts or even by human activities, for example, by deliberate electromagnetic disturbance of the near-Earth environment, including the Van Allen belts. Furthermore, sub-shell convection disruption might trigger surface geophysical disasters, such as super-volcano eruptions [2-4].

Scientists have a fundamental responsibility to tell the truth and to provide scientific understanding that benefits humanity.

References

Williams, T.J., Cataclysmic Polarity Shift is US National Security Prepared for the Next Geomagnetic Pole Reversal. 2015, Air Command and Staff Colleage, Maxwell AFB United States.

Herndon, J.M., Cataclysmic geomagnetic field collapse: Global security concerns. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 2020. 24(4): p. 61-79.

Herndon, J.M., Causes and consequences of geomagnetic field collapse. J. Geog. Environ. Earth Sci. Intn., 2020. 24(9): p. 60-76.

Herndon, J.M., Humanity imperiled by the geomagnetic field and human corruption. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2021. 8(1): p. 456-478.

Illy, J., Einstein’s Gyros. Physics in Perspective, 2019. 21(4): p. 274-295.

Courtillot, V. and J.L. Le Mouël, The study of Earth's magnetism (1269–1950): A foundation by Peregrinus and subsequent development of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism. Reviews of Geophysics, 2007. 45(3).

Needham, J., Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 1, Physics,. 1962, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gilbert, W., De Magnete. 1600, London: Peter Short. 240. 94 Herndon, J. M. (2021). Reasons Why Geomagnetic Field Generation is Physically Impossible in Earth’s Fluid Core. Advances in Social Sciences

Gauss, J.C.F., Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus: Resultate aus den Beobachtungen des magnetischen Vereins in Jahre 1838. 1838, Leipzig. 73.

Faraday, M., Experimental researches in electricity, vol. III. London, UK: Richard Taylor and William Francis, 1855: p. 1846-1852.

Oldham, R.D., The constitution of the interior of the earth as revealed by earthquakes. Q. T. Geol. Soc. Lond., 1906.

Herndon, J.M., Feasibility of a nuclear fission reactor at the center of the Earth as the energy source for the geomagnetic field. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 1993. 45: p. 423-437.

Elsasser, W.M., On the origin of the Earth's magnetic field. Phys. Rev., 1939. 55: p. 489-498.

Elsasser, W.M., Induction effects in terrestrial magnetism. Phys. Rev., 1946. 69: p. 106-116.

Elsasser, W.M., The Earth's interior and geomagnetism. Revs. Mod. Phys., 1950. 22: p. 1-35.

Marusek, J.A., Solar storm threat analysis. 2007: J. Marusek.

Oughton, E.J., et al., A risk assessment framework for the socioeconomic impacts of electricity transmission infrastructure failure due to space weather: An application to the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis, 2019. 39(5): p.

Cannon, P., et al., Extreme space weather: impacts on engineered systems and infrastructure. 2013: Royal Academy of Engineering.

Baldwin, I., Discovery of electricity and the electromagnetic force: Its importance for environmentalists, educators, physicians, politicians, and citizens. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2020. 7(12): p. 362-383.

Herndon, J.M., Nuclear fission reactors as energy sources for the giant outer planets. Naturwissenschaften, 1992.

Herndon, J.M., Planetary and protostellar nuclear fission: Implications for planetary change, stellar ignition and dark matter. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, 1994. A455: p. 453-461.

Herndon, J.M., Sub-structure of the inner core of the earth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996. 93: p. 646-648.

Herndon, J.M., Composition of the deep interior of the earth: divergent geophysical development with fundamentally different geophysical implications. Phys. Earth Plan. Inter, 1998. 105: p. 1-4.

Herndon, J.M., Examining the overlooked implications of natural nuclear reactors. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. U., 1998. 79(38): p. 451,456. 3 4

Herndon, J.M., Nuclear georeactor origin of oceanic basalt He/ He, evidence, and implications. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003. 100(6): p. 3047-3050.

Herndon, J.M., Nuclear georeactor generation of the earth's geomagnetic field. Curr. Sci., 2007. 93(11): p. 1485-

Herndon, J.M., Nature of planetary matter and magnetic field generation in the solar system. Curr. Sci., 2009. 96(8): p. 1033-1039.

Herndon, J.M., Terracentric nuclear fission georeactor: background, basis, feasibility, structure, evidence and geophysical implications. Curr. Sci., 2014. 106(4): p. 528-541.

Roberts, P.H. and E.M. King, On the genesis of the Earth's magnetism. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2013. 76(9): p. 096801.

Huguet, L., H. Amit, and T. Alboussière, Geomagnetic dipole changes and upwelling/downwelling at the top of the Earth’s core. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2018. 6: p. 170.

Glatzmaier, G.A., Geodynamo simulations - How realistic are they? Ann. Rev.Earth Planet. Sci., 2002. 30: p. 237-

Guervilly, C., P. Cardin, and N. Schaeffer, Turbulent convective length scale in planetary cores. Nature, 2019. 570(7761): p. 368.

Herndon, J.M., Geodynamic Basis of Heat Transport in the Earth. Curr. Sci., 2011. 101(11): p. 1440-1450.

Chandrasekhar, S., Thermal Convection. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci., 1957. 86(4): p. 323-339.

Herndon, J.M., Role of atmospheric convection in global warming. J. Geog. Environ. Earth Sci. Intn., 2019. 19(4): p.

Herndon, J.M. and M. Whiteside, Further evidence that particulate pollution is the principal cause of global warming: Humanitarian considerations. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 2019. 21(1): p. 1-11.

http://nuclearplanet.com/convection.mp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAXOXx3H8AI

Dziewonski, A.M. and D.A. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1981. 25: p.

Rayleigh, L., On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid, when the higher temperature is on the under side. Phil. Mag., 1916. 32: p. 529-546.

Kent, D.V. and F.M. Gradstein, A Cretacious and Jurassic geochronology. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 1985. 96(11): p. 1419.

Cande, S.C. and D.V. Kent, Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res., 1995. 100: p. 6093.

Birch, F., The transformation of iron at high pressures, and the problem of the earth's magnetism. Am. J. Sci., 1940.

Lehmann, I., P'. Publ. Int. Geod. Geophys. Union, Assoc. Seismol., Ser. A, Trav. Sci., 1936. 14: p. 87-115.

Keil, K., Mineralogical and chemical relationships among enstatite chondrites. J. Geophys. Res., 1968. 73(22): p.

Reed, S.J.B., Perryite in the Kota-Kota and South Oman enstatite chondrites. Mineral Mag., 1968. 36: p. 850-854.

Wasson, J.T. and C.M. Wai, Composition of the metal, schreibersite and perryite of enstatite achondrites and the origin of enstatite chondrites and achondrites Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1970. 34: p. 169-184. Herndon, J. M. (2021). Reasons Why Geomagnetic Field Generation is Physically Impossible in Earth’s Fluid Core. Advances in Social Sciences

Herndon, J.M., The nickel silicide inner core of the Earth. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, 1979. A368: p. 495-500.

Herndon, J.M., The chemical composition of the interior shells of the Earth. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, 1980. A372: p. 149-

Herndon, J.M., The object at the centre of the Earth. Naturwissenschaften, 1982. 69: p. 34-37.

Herndon, J.M., Scientific basis of knowledge on Earth's composition. Curr. Sci., 2005. 88(7): p. 1034-1037.

Herndon, J.M., New indivisible planetary science paradigm. Curr. Sci., 2013. 105(4): p. 450-460.

Herndon, J.M., Hydrogen geysers: Explanation for observed evidence of geologically recent volatile-related activity on Mercury’s surface. Curr. Sci., 2012. 103(4): p. 361-361.

Herndon, J.M. and H.E. Suess, Can enstatite meteorites form from a nebula of solar composition? Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1976. 40: p. 395-399.

Murrell, M.T. and D.S. Burnett, Actinide microdistributions in the enstatite meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1982. 46: p. 2453-2460.

Hollenbach, D.F. and J.M. Herndon, Deep-earth reactor: nuclear fission, helium, and the geomagnetic field. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001. 98(20): p. 11085-11090.

Herndon, J.M., Solar System processes underlying planetary formation, geodynamics, and the georeactor. Earth, Moon, and Planets, 2006. 99(1): p. 53-99.

Gando, A., et al., Reactor on-off antineutrino measurement with KamLAND. Physical Review D, 2013. 88(3): p.

Agostini, M., et al., Comprehensive geoneutrino analysis with Borexino. Physical Review D, 2020. 101(1): p. 012009.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-12

How to Cite

Herndon, J. M. (2021). Reasons Why Geomagnetic Field Generation is Physically Impossible in Earth’s Fluid Core. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(5), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10184

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>