Do Computer and Foreign language literacy affect native language (L1) reading strategies?

Authors

  • Aristea Mavrogianni a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:73:"Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Crete";}
  • Εleni Vassilaki
  • Apostolos Sarris
  • Emmanuel Yachnakis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.86.10469

Keywords:

MARSI-2fGR; metacognitive Awareness; reading Strategies; textor and textout; foreign Language Knowledge; Computer Literacy;

Abstract

This research investigates metacognitive awareness, students reading strategies preferences and their correlation to independent demographic and educational variables. Data were gathered through the MARSI-2fGR inventory administered to a random sample of 632 students aged 12-24 from 68 schools in various urban, semi-urban and rural regions in Greece. The alternative factorial structure of the MARSI-2fGR inventory comprised of two factors, namely textor and textout, standing for text-oriented and beyond text reading strategies that Greek secondary students use. Results showed significant differences in favour of the textor reading strategies compared to the textout. It seems that other parameters affect the reading strategies preferences more than the family's socioeconomic status. Both variables of foreign language knowledge and computer literacy showed statistically significant differences. Therefore, it appeared that the more literate someone is in foreign languages and computers, the more reading strategies he/she declared to use. This research sheds new light on the way that Greek students read academic or school-related material.

References

Alahiotis, S., & Karatzia-Stavlioti, E. (2006). Effective Curriculum Policy and Cross-Curricularity: Analysis of the New Curriculum Design of the Hellenic Pedagogical Institute. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 14, 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360600738277

Anagnostopoulou, K., Hatzinikita, A., & Christidou, V. (2010). Assessed Students' Competencies in the Greek School Framework and the PISA Survey. Review of Science, Mathematics & ICT Education, 4, 43-61. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.138

Anagnostopoulou, K., Hatzinikita, V., Christidou, V., & Dimopoulos, K. (2013). PISA Test Items and School-Based Examinations in Greece: Exploring the Relationship between Global and Local Assessment Discourses. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 636-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604801

Bikos, G. (2018). The Educational Outcomes of the Relationship between Schoolbooks and Teachers. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 5, 399-405. https://www.ijires.org

Bonidis, K. (2004). The Content of the School Textbook as the Object of Research: Longitudinal Examination of the Related Research and Methodological Approaches. Athens: Metaixmio. (In Greek)

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/home/rer

Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners' reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 389–421. doi:10.1111/jrir.12003

Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Guthrie, J. T. (2002). Preparing students for High-stakes test taking in reading. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 370–391). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Habók, A. & Magyar, A. (2019) The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners' reading strategy use, Cogent Education, 6:1, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522

Katsarou, E. (2009). A Multiliteracy Intervention in a Contemporary "Mono-Literacy" School in Greece. International Journal of Learning 16, 55-65. https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/cgrn/242/249

https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i05/46285

Katsarou, E., & Tsafos, V. (2009). Students' Subjectivities vs. Dominant Discourses in Greek L1 Curriculum. International Journal of Learning, 16, 35-46. https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/cgrn/242/249

https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i11/46706

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koutrouba, K. (2012). A Profile of the Effective Teacher: Greek Secondary Education Teachers' Perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.654332

LaRusso, M., Kim, H.Y, Selman, R., Uccelli, P., Dawson, Th., Jones, S., Donovan, S. & Snow, C. (2016). Contributions of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning to deep reading comprehension, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035

Martinez, A. C. L. (2008). Analysis of ESP university students' reading strategy awareness. Iberica, 15, 165-176. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/

Marx, A., Stanat, P., Roick, T., Segerer, R., Marx, P., & Schneider, W. (2015). Components of reading comprehension in adolescent first-language and second-language students from low track schools. Reading and Writing, 28, 891–914. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9554-3

Mavrogianni, A., Vassilaki, Ε., Spantidakis, G., Sarris, A., Papadaki-Michailidi, E. & Yachnakis, E. (2020). An Alternative Factorization of the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory Associated with the Greek National Curriculum and Its Psychometric Properties. Creative Education, 11, 1299-1323. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.118096.

Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in secondlanguage learners:Ameta-analysis of studies comparing first- and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (2), 409–433. doi:10.1037/a0033890

Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C. A. (2002). "Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies". Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/edu/

Nikolov, M., & Csapó, B. (2010). The relationship between reading skills in early English as a foreign language and Hungarian as a first language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(3), 315–329. doi:10.1177/1367006910367854

Nikolov, M., & Csapó, B. (2018). The relationships between 8th graders' L1 and L2 reading skills, inductive reasoning and socioeconomic status in early English and German as a foreign language programs. System, 73(4), 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.11.001

OECD (2019), PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/

Pinninti, L. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies: An Indian context. The Reading Matrix: An International Online, 16(1), 179–193. Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/

Pinninti, L. (2019). Criteria for qualitative evaluation of strategy training, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 16(2), 185–195. Retrieved from https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/

Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G. & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In Vasta, R., Whitehurst, G. (eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 5, pp. 89–129). New York: JAI Press.

Scharlach, T. D. (2008). START comprehending: Students and teachers actively reading text. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.1.3

Skourtou, E., & Kourtis-Kazoullis, V. (2003). The Step from Traditional Pedagogy to Transformative. The International Journal of the Humanities, 1, 1329-1330. https://theijhss.com

Sporer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003

Stahl, S., David, B., & Yaden, J. (2004). The development of literacy in preschool and primary grades: Work by the center for the improvement of early reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1086/428862

Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213–244). Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.11tay

Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1

Downloads

Published

2021-07-08

How to Cite

Mavrogianni, A., Vassilaki Ε., Sarris, A., & Yachnakis, E. (2021). Do Computer and Foreign language literacy affect native language (L1) reading strategies?. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(6), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.86.10469