Mathletics software and student attainment in grade 4- a cultural historical analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10273Keywords:
Mathletics; mediation; cultural historical theory; student attainmentAbstract
Mathletics is a networked mathematics software package that affords students the opportunity to solve problems. This software is extremely popular in the developed world (Day, 2013) and is gaining popularity in the developing world as a tool that can potentially impact students’ mathematics attainment. 25 years after democracy South Africa continues to lag behind the rest of the world in mathematics and science attainment (Isdale, Reddy, Juan & Arends, 2017). The use of computer-based software packages to meet the needs of developing students’ understanding of mathematics is, therefore, of interest in our context. However, research is clear that it is not technology itself that can lead to learning but rather, how this technology is used; that is, the pedagogical practices underpinning the use of technology serves to develop understanding. This study sought to investigate Mathletics ability to impact positively on student attainment as well as their understanding. Findings indicated that Mathletics software does not build mediation into its programme and, therefore, does not develop conceptual understanding. In relation to student’s attainment, findings indicated that children did not perform better after using Mathletics on a summative test of calculation problems, pointing to the importance of pedagogical underpinnings when using technology.
References
3P Learning. (2010a) Mathletics. Available at: www.mathletics.com.au. Accessed 30 June 2011. 3P Learning (2010b) Mathletics Student Centre Guide Sydney: 3P Learning.
Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. Dissertation. CD Bèta Press, Utrecht.
Bass,H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education, Bull. Amer. Mathematic Society. (42), pp. 417–430.
Cozad, L., & Riccomini, P. (2016). Effects of digital-based math fluency interventions on learners with math difficulties: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, (5), pp. 1–19.
Day, L. (2013). A snapshot of ICT use in primary mathematics classrooms in Western Australia. APMC 18(1), 16-
Drigas, A., & Pappas, M. (2015). A Review of Mobile Learning Applications for Mathematics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 9 (15), pp.18-22.
Drijvers P. (2015). Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Why It Works (Or Doesn’t). In: Cho S. (eds) Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham
Harrison, C., Lunzer, E., Tymms, P., Fitz-Gibbon, C. & Restorick, J. (2004). “Use of ICT and its relationship with performance in examinations: a comparison of the ImpaCT2 project’s research findings using pupil-level, schoollevel and multilevel modelling data”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (20), pp. 319-337.
Hennessy, S. (2000). “Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (3), pp.243-258.
Herold, S. A. (2013). Effectiveness of Paper-Based, Computer-Based, and Interactive Learning Strategies for Recall of Multiplication Facts, Dissertation, Ohio University.
Isdale, K., Reddy, V., Juan, A., & Arends, F. 2017. TIMSS Grade 5 National Report: Understanding mathematics achievement amongst grade 5 learners in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology in school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, (22), pp.215–243.
Kirkpatrick, H & Cuban, L. (1998). “Computers make kids smarter – right”? Technos, 7(2), pp.26-31. Mathletics team 2019, Mathletics website Home page, Available from: http://za.mathletics.com/primary
Nansen, B., Chakraborty, K., Gibbs, L., Vetere, F., & MacDougall, C. (2012). ‘You do the math’: Mathletics and the play of online learning. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1216–1235.
Schollar, E. (2001). “A review of two evaluations of the application of the READ Primary Schools Programme in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa”. International Journal of Educational Research, (35), pp.205-216.
Sinclair, N., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2016). Digital technologies in the early primary school classroom. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 662–686). New York: Taylor Francis/Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Drijvers, P. (2010). MobileMath; exploring mathematics outside the classroom. ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 789–799.
Wong, M & Evans D. (2007). “Improving basic multiplication fact recall for primary school students”. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19 (1), pp.89 – 106.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Woodward, J., & Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, (67), 503–536.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Joanne Hardman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
