Changes in the Style and Contents of Abstracts from The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology between the 1960s and the 2010s
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.710.9215Keywords:
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, abstracts, styleAbstract
This study was conducted to examine changes in the style and content of abstracts from the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology across time. Characteristics examined were word commonness, word activation, word pleasantness, sentence length, abstract length, mentions of inferential statistics and mentions of drugs (both street drugs and pharmaceuticals). Abstracts (N=510) were downloaded from volumes published before the wide introduction of computers (1968-9) and from those published in more current years (2016-17). Scores for word pleasantness and word activation were assessed with the Dictionary of Affect in Language. Word commonness was scored in comparison to a corpus of everyday English, and sentence length and abstract length were measured in terms of number of words. There were several strong and significant differences between abstracts from the pre-computer era and those from the 21st century, including greater length, more mentions of inferential statistics and more mentions of drugs in the later time period. A stepwise discriminant function analysis was able to correctly predict the origin (early or pre-computer versus 21st century) of 98% of the abstracts on the basis of the characteristics measured (canonical correlation=.89).
References
Compton, W. M., Grant, B. F., Colliver, J. D., Glantz, M. D., & Stinson, F. S. (2004). Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2114.
Fidel, R. (1986). Writing Abstracts for Free-Text Searching. Journal of Documentation, 42, 11–21.
Guerin, M., Pepe, A., & Lepri, B. (2012). Do linguistic style and readability of scientific abstracts affect their virality? Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Martins SS, Mazzotti G., Chilcoat, H.D. (2005). Trends in ecstasy use in the United States from 1995 to 2001: comparison with marijuana users and association with other drug use. Experimental Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13: 244-252.
Miech, R., & Koester, S. (2012). Trends in U.S., past-year marijuana use from 1985 to 2009: An age–period–cohort analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 124, 259–267.
Rucci, A. J., & Tweney, R. D. (1980). Analysis of variance and the "second discipline" of scientific psychology: A historical account. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 166-184.
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Cylke, V. A., & Stubbs, D. A. (2000) Psychology without p values: data analysis at the turn of the 19th century. American Psychologist, 55, 260-263.
Stigler, S. M. (1996). The history of statistics in 1933. Statistical Science, 11, 244–252.
Trevisani, M., & Tuzzi, A. (2014). A portrait of JASA: The History of Statistics through analysis of keyword counts in an early scientific journal. Quality & Quantity, 49, 1287-1304.
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 3–17.
Whissell, C. (2009). Using the revised Dictionary of Affect in Language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychological Reports, 105, 509–521.
Whissell, C. (2013). Titles in highly ranked multidisciplinary psychology journals 1966–2011: more words and punctuation marks allow for the communication of more information. Psychological Reports, 113, 969–986.
Zhang, C., & Liu, X. (2011). Review of James Hartley's Research on structured abstracts. Journal of Information Science. 37, 570-576.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Gian Di Feo, Cynthia Whissell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
