Security Threats Posed by Contraband Cell Phones in Naivasha Maximum Prison in Kenya: Prison Officers’ Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.77.8708Keywords:
Cell phone, Prison, Security, Security threatsAbstract
In the recent past, cell phones have emerged to be among the leading outlawed contemporary contrabands in correctional facilities around the globe. Although official statistics on the number of contraband cell phones globally remains elusive, searches by prison officials project a worrisome trend. At Naivasha Maximum Prison, it is estimated that 30% of the inmates possess one cell phone. Existing studies are more inclined to how phones are smuggled, who smuggle them and their impact on rehabilitation of offenders. Limited studies have been carried out to examine the security threats posed by smuggling and use of cell phones into the prisons. One school of thought argues that cell phones are smuggled into prisons and used by inmates for a good course including communicating with their significant others and for leisure. The other school of thought argues that they are used to commit crimes and thus a source of insecurity to officers, inmates and the members of public. This paper is guided by three specific objectives; to examine security threats prison officers are prone to due to smuggling and use of cell phones at the prison; to examine security threats inmates are prone to due to smuggling and use of cell phones at the prison and finally to examine security threats members of public are prone to due to smuggling and use of cell phones at the prison. The study employed descriptive research design. The unit of analysis was an individual prison officer. A sample size of 182 respondents was drawn from a population of 507 junior prison officers using simple random sampling technique. Primary data was collected through questionnaires. The results of this study indicated that prison officers are prone to physical injuries (38.92%), ambushes during escorts (29.94%) and espionage (20.35%). Inmates were prone to physical attacks (46.78%), electronic fraud (26.28%) and exploitation (21.79%). Members of public were prone to electronic fraud (74.40%) and kidnappings (40.47%). This current study concluded that cell phones in prison facilities pose significant security threats to prison officers, inmates and the members of public. These security threats are therefore of national concern. This study will add to existing body of knowledge on prisons and address policy gaps that exists in controlling cell phones in prison facilities.
References
Adetula, G. A., Adetula, A., and Fatusin, A. F. (2010). The Prison Subsystem Culture: Its Attitudinal Effects on Operatives, Convicts and the Free Society. IFE Psychology: An International Journal, 18(1), 189-205.
Akpunne, B. C. (2014). Access to Basic Needs as Correlate of Desire to Participate in Rehabilitation Programmes among Inmates of Nigerian Prisons. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 33(1).
Bates, A. (2016). The Social Order of the Underworld: How Prison Gangs Govern the American Penal System. The Cato Journal, 36(1), 187.
Bisht, M., Kumar, M., Solanki, H. K., Kaur, T., & Rawat, V. (2018). Microbial Contamination of Mobile Phones of Health Care Providers at a Teaching Hospital in a Hilly North Indian State. Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine, 4(1), 34.
Burke, T. W., & Owen, S. S. (2010). Cell Phones as Prison Contraband. Federal Bureau of Investigation Law Enforcement Bull., 79, 10. 823
Christie, J. C. (2010). Disconnected: The Safe Prisons Communications Act Fails to Address Prison Communications. Jurimetrics, 51, 1-17.
Chukwudi, F. (2012). Challenges of Reforms in the Nigerian Prison System: Lessons from the U.S.A. and South Africa. Journal of Social Science and Public Policy, 4(9). 7 and 35-46.
Grommon, E. (2018). Managed access technology to combat contraband cell phones in prison: Findings from a process evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 39-47.
Jones, C., Narag, R., & Morales, R. (2015). Philippine Prison Gangs: Control or Chaos?. RegNet Research Paper, (2015/71).
Lindegaard, M. R., & Gear, S. (2014). Violence Makes Safe in South African Prisons: Prison Gangs, Violent Acts, and Victimization among Inmates. Focal, 2014(68), 35-54.
Musili, L. W. and Mbatia, P. N. (2016). The Status of HIV/AIDS Management Strategies in Correctional Settings in Kenya: A Case Study of Lang'ata Women and Kamiti Maximum Prisons. Sociology and Anthropology, 4(4), 206-211.
Obioha, E. E. (2011). Challenges and Reforms in the Nigerian Prisons System. Journal of Social Sciences, 27(2), 95-109.
Omboto, J. O. (2013). The Challenges Facing Rehabilitation of Prisoners in Kenya and the Mitigation Strategies. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2(2), 39-43.
Rocheleau, A. M. (2014). Prisoner Coping Skills and Involvement in Serious Prison Misconduct. Victims and Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-Based Research, Policy and Practice, 9(2), 149-177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 John Ngugi Kariuki, Wokabi Mwangi, Hadija Murenga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
