Effectiveness of Evaluation Evidence to Influence Change in Primary Education Sub-sector in Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.73.7610Abstract
A well-designed impact evaluation study in the education sector is relevant in informing decision and policymaking based on high-quality evidence generated from the research. In this paper, we provide a chronology on how we developed and implemented an impact evaluation on school facilities grant (SFG) programme designed to support Government aided primary schools in Uganda – to construct classrooms, sanitation facilities as well as teacher houses. We describe the appropriate methodology, randomization designs implemented and the target groups. Results revealed that selecting a clear intervention with identified observable and unobservable characteristics is important for the robust results. Measuring attribution on outcomes may also require a balance on internal and external validity checks and analysis. The internal validity, in addition to statistical measures also requires stakeholders’ engagement in the impact study process as a way of promoting social audits of public programmes. Finally, a well-planned and designed evaluation often leads to increased public trust in the findings and evidence uptake hence informing policy decision in management of programmes and projects.
References
Baker, J. L. 2000. Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334
Djimeu, E. W., D.-G. Houndolo (2016) Power calculation for causal inference in social science: sample size and minimum detectable effect determination, Journal of Development Effectiveness, 8:4, 508-527, DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2016.1244555.
Government of Uganda (2010). Nationak Development Plan I (2010/11 – 2014/15). Kampala, Uganda
Government of Uganda (2012). Uganda Vision 2040, Kampala, Uganda
Government of Uganda (2015). Nationak Development Plan II (2015/16 – 2019/20). Kampala, Uganda
Ministry of Education and Sports (2015). The Education Sector Strategic Plan (2016/17 – 2019/20)
Gertler, P., H. A. Patrinos and M. Rubio-Codina. 2007. Impact Evaluation for School-Based Management Reform.
Gertler, P., H. A. Patrinos and M. Rubio-Codina. 2012. Empowering Parents to Improve Education: Evidence from Rural Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 99(1): 68-79.
Gertler, P. J., S. Martinez, P. Premand, L. B. Rawlings and C. M. J. Vermeersch. 2011. Impact Evaluation in Practice.
Grindle, M. 2004. Despite the Odds: The Contentious Politics of Educational Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hinton, R. 2015. Assessing the Strength of Evidence in the Education Sector. London, England: United Kingdom Department for International Development.
Khandker, S., G. Koolwal and H. Samad. 2010. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices.
Khemani, S. 2007. Can Information Campaigns Overcome Political Obstacles to Serving the Poor? in S. Devarajan and I. Widlund, eds., The Politics of Service Delivery in Democracies. 20 References | Generating Evidence in the Education Sector
Kothari (2004) Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi.
Krueger, A. B. and Zhu, P. 2004. Another Look at the New York City School Voucher Experiment. American Behavioral Scientist 47(5) 658-698.
Lewis, L. and H. Patrinos. 2012. Impact Evaluation of Private Sector Participation in Education. Reading, Berkshire, England: CfBT and Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012.
Majumdar, S., A. Mani and S. Mukand. 2004. Politics, Information and the Urban Bias. Journal of Development Economics 75(1): 137-165.
Marcus, A. (ed.) and D. Berman. 2013. Cambodia: Challenges in Scaling Up Preschools. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Miller, S.D., Duncan, B.L., Brown, J., Sparks, J., & Claud, D. (2003). The outcome rating scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2(2), 91-100.
Moffitt, R., J. Fitzgerald and P. Gottschalk. 1999. Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Role of Selection on Observables. Annale d’Economie et de Statistique 55/56: 129-152.
Montenegro, Claudio E. and H. A. Patrinos. 2014. Comparable Estimates of Returns to Schooling Around the World. Policy Research Working Paper 7020. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Späth, B., 2004. “Current State of the Art in Impact Assessment: With A Special View on Small Enterprise Development”. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. Available at: http://www.deza.ch/ressources/resource_en_24414.pdf
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students, 5th ed., Harlow, Pearson Education.
UNDG (2011). Results-Based Management Handbook: Harmonizing RBM concepts and approaches for improved development results at country level. United Nations Development Group.
World Bank. 2012. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 James Wokadala

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
