Planning and Integration of Technologies for Effective Implementation of Blended Learning in Universities in Rivers State, Nigeria

Authors

  • P. C. Ukaigwe
  • Innocent U. Igbozuruike

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.71.7647

Abstract

The study investigated planning the integration of technologies in higher institutions as a strategy for effective implementation of blended learning in universities in Rivers State. The design used was descriptive. The population of this study consisted of the 4,377 teaching staff in the three (3) public universities in Rivers State, comprising 2,348 male and 2,029 female teaching staff.  The universities are the University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State University and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education. The sample of this study was 590 elements, comprising 327 male and 263 female teaching staff that were drawn from the population using stratified random sampling technique. Instrument of data collection was a questionnaire that yielded a reliability index of 0.84, using test-retest and Pearson Product Moment Correlation techniques. The data generated were analysed using mean to answer research questions. z-test was used to test hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. Findings showed that aligning university's visions with the aspirations of full integration of blended learning into university system, provision of required communication networking infrastructures and modifying curriculum designs to become deliverable through blended learning mode are key ways of integrating blended learning in the university system. Recommendations made included that university managers should consider seriously, the advantages of blended learning in the school system, with a view to using planning to foster the integration of the learning innovation into the traditional face-to-face teaching and learning approach for improving students learning experiences and achievements.

References

Agabi, O. G. (1999). Introducing educational planning. Port Harcourt: International Centre for Educational Services.

Ali, A. (2019).Blended learning in Saudi Arabia - A review. Global Journal of Education and Training, 2(6) 1-7

Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students' achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220-234.

Al-Saleh, R.S.S. (2018). EFL teacher’s attitudes towards blended learning in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 5(1), 5065-5071.

Anusiem, A. U. (2006). Processes of human learning. Owerri: Divine Mercy Publishers

Asarta, C. J. & Schmidt, J. R. (2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter? The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.002

Dele, H. S. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson, London.

Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed). New Jersey: Allyn & Bacon.

Ekhmimi, T.A. (2018). Blended learning among adults in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished master’s thesis). Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington

Ezekoka, G. K. (2015).Blended learning in National Open University of Nigeria (Noun) - Prospects and Constraints. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 2 ( 6) 457-461

Haruna, U. & Igbozuruike, I. U (2019).Integration of e-learning in secondary education and the imperatives of planning for sustainable improvement in students' achievement in Port-Harcourt Metropolis. Paper presented at the 21st annual national conference of Nationwide Association for the Advancement of Knowledge (NAFAK). Held at National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Trans Ekulu Enugu State.

Jiang, M. (2012).Research Highlights Improved Teaching and Learning Through the 1:1 eLearning Initiative in Shanghai. USA: Intel Corporation

Madumere, S.C. (1997). Educational planning and manpower development. Lagos: Samuel Printing Press.

Mezieobi, S. A. & Anekwe, J. U. (2017).Blending learning in university education: affordances and drawbacks for digital natives and digital immigrants in developing nations. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(2) 68-84

Noordink, M. (2010). Different ways of teaching different pedagogical approaches. Retreived from online blog http://marlijnenoordink.blogspot.com.

Obasi, V. A. Obih, S. A. & Udosen, A. (2016). Factors affecting learning. In T.N. Kanno, V. A. Obasi, & S. A. Obih, (Eds). Contemporary issues in curriculum implementation & methods. Owerri: Hysab Prints & Pubnlishers

Okaz, A. (2015). Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences 186, 600 – 603

Sarıtepeci, M. & Cakir, H. (2015). The effect of blended learning environments on student motivation and student engagement: A study on social studies course. Education and Science, 40(170), 203–216.

Turner, J., Young-Lowe, W. & Newton, J. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of blended learning for instructional delivery and student production in K-12 Classrooms. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8 (2) 18-26

Ukaigwe, P. C. & Igbozuruike, I. U. (2019). Planning: A tool for administration of teachers' competence development programmes for improved service delivery in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(1) 91-100.

Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002

Downloads

Published

2020-01-28

How to Cite

Ukaigwe, P. C. ., & Igbozuruike, I. U. . (2020). Planning and Integration of Technologies for Effective Implementation of Blended Learning in Universities in Rivers State, Nigeria . Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(1), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.71.7647