Optimal government size and economic growth in Spain. Evidences through the Armey Curve (1980-2016).

Authors

  • Carlos Navarro UAX

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.612.7524

Keywords:

Armey Curve, economic growth, public expenditure, government size

Abstract

This study analyzes the effect of public expenditure on economic growth for the Spanish economy, in the period between 1980 and 2016. The Armey curve is used as an analytical tool to describe the relationship between the two variables indicated. The two objectives of this study are check if there is a quadratic relationship of this kind between the two variables for the Spanish economy, as predicted by the model, and there, calculate their optimum. The empirical findings indicate the existence of a significant relationship inverted U-shaped between the two variables in the Spanish economy, obtaining an optimal public expenditure in Spain of 40.07% of GDP, 5.07% lower than the size of the public sector by 2016. Based on these results, an economic policy proposal could be the need to reduce the percentage of public expenditure with the goal of attaining greater efficiency in the Spanish economy.

References

Armey, D. and Armey, R. (1995) The Freedom Revolution: The New Republican House Majority

Barro, R.J. (1989) A Cross-Country Study of Growth, Saving and Government. NBER Working Paper No. 2855.

Barro, R.J. (1980) Government Expenditure in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, October, part II, S103-2125.

Coll, S. (2014) Is there to much government in Developed Countries? A time-series analysis of 24 OECD-economies. Journal of Heterodox Economics. Volume 1, Issue 1.

Forte, F. and Magazzino, C. (2011) Government Size and Economic Growth in Italy: A Time-series Analysis. European Scientific Journal vol.12, No.7 ISSN: 1857-7881

Facchini, F. and Melki, M. (2011) Optimal government size and economic growth in France (1871-2008): An explanation by the State and market failures. Id HAL: halshs-00654363, in aviablehttps://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-00654363

Farouk, O. and Aydun, C. (2013) The Relationship Between Optimal Size of Government and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria. Proceeded - Social and Behavioral Sciences 92, 66-75

Herath, S. (2010) The Size of the Government and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study of Sri Lanka. SRE -Discussion Papers, 2010/05. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.

Lucas, R .(1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, July, 3-42.

Magazzino, C. and Forte, F. (2010) Optimal size of government and economic growth in EU-27. Munich MPRA Paper No. 26669, online athttp://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26669/

Mavrov, H. (2007). The Size of Government Expenditure and the Rate of Economic Growth in Bulgaria. Online Access inhttp://alternativi.unwe.acad.bg/bu18/06.pdf

Pevcin, P. (2004) Does optimal size of government expenditure exist? Paper presented to the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) Annual Conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1-4 September 2004.

Rahn, R. and Fox, H. (1996). What is the Optimum Size of Government. Denver, CO: Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.

Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, October, 1002 to

Roy, A. (2009) Evidence on Economic Growth and Government Size. Applied Economics. 41. 607-614. 10.1080 /

Scully, G. (1998) Measuring the Burden of High Taxes, National Center for Policy Analysis Policy Report No. 215

Solow, R.M. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70 (1), 65-

Swan, T.W. (1956) Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, 32 (2), 334-361.

Vedder, R.K. and Gallaway, L.E. (1998) Government size and economic growth. Prepared for the Joinf Economic Committee. Washington, DC: Joint Economic Committee.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-16

How to Cite

Navarro, C. (2019). Optimal government size and economic growth in Spain. Evidences through the Armey Curve (1980-2016). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(12), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.612.7524