Accountability Analysis in the Implementation of Employees Performance in Kanreg II BKN Surabaya

Authors

  • Sri Wahyuni
  • Ikadona Aliyaturrahma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.611.7394

Abstract

The research aims to analyze administrative and professional accountability in the implementation of employees performance in Kanreg II BKN Surabaya. There are two elements in the implementation of employees performance, namely Employee Work Targets and Work Behavior. Antonio Bar Cendon (1999), states that there are four forms of accountability typology, namely a) Political Accountability b) Administrative Accountability c) Professional Accountability d) Accountability for Democracy. The research uses descriptive qualitative method that focuses on operational principle, internal accountability, external accountability, subject matter, criteria, mechanism, and consequences. Data collection technique is done by observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the analysis of administrative and professional accountability in implementing employees performance in Kanreg II BKN Surabaya are more dominant type of administrative and professional accountability, that can be seen from the sub-indicator of the dominant type of administrative accountability. The research is inseparable from the supporting factors, namely regulation, supervision, application systems, description of main tasks and functions, rewards, and sanctions.

References

Azhari. 2011. Mereformasi Birokrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bar Cendon, Antonio. 1999. Accountability and Public Administration: Concepts, Dimensions, Developments, Conference Proceedings, Openness and Transparency in Governance: Challenges and Opportunities, Maastricht. The Netherlands.

Bovens, M. 1998. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge.

Dwivedi O.P. and J.G. Jabbra, Public Service Responsibility, dikutip M. Bovens, The Quest, Two concepts, juga dikutip B.S. Romzek, M.J. Dubnik, Accountability in the public sector. Idrus, Muhammad. 2009. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, Penerbit Erlangga, Ciaracas – Jakarta.

LAN dan BPKP. 2000. Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara.

Milles, Matthew B dan A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Analisa Data Kualitatif, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Prasojo, E., dan Kurniawan, Teguh. 2008. Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Kasus Best Practices dari Sejumlah Daerah di Indonesia. Prosiding pada 5 th International Symposium of Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, Banjarmasin.

Republik Indonesia, 1945. Undang – Undang Dasar.

Republik Indonesia. 2011. Peraturan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 34 Tahun 2011 tentang “Pedoman Penyusunan dan Penilaian Sasaran Kerja Pegawai dl Lingkungan Badan Kepegawaian Negara”.

Republik Indonesia. 2011. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 tentang “Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil”.

Republik Indonesia. 2013. Peraturan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang “Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil”.

Republik Indonesia. 2016. Peraturan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 3 Tahun 2016 tentang “Pedoman Penyusunan Standar Teknis Kegiatan Sasaran Kerja Pegawai”.

Sedarmayanti. 2010. Reformasi Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Kepemimpinan Masa Depan. Bandung: PT. Rafika Aditama.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-24

How to Cite

Wahyuni, S. ., & Aliyaturrahma, I. . (2019). Accountability Analysis in the Implementation of Employees Performance in Kanreg II BKN Surabaya. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(11), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.611.7394