Farmers’ Perception on Acceptability of Improved Sugarcane Varieties in Kakamega County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.67.6766Keywords:
Sugarcane, Attributes, Acceptance, Compatibility, Improved varietiesAbstract
Improved sugarcane varieties have been developed and promoted in Kenya, with an aim of enhancing sugarcane productivity. However, their acceptance by farmers is low. This paper examines farmers’ perception on these varieties as a basis for explaining their acceptability by farmers and attempts to underpin determinants that inhibit or facilitate their acceptance. This study was conducted using a cross-sectional survey research design. Target population was 137,355 small-scale sugarcane farmers from Kakamega County, from which a sample of 384 farmers was randomly selected. Questionnaires were used to collect data, which was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The research findings confirmed that majority of farmers produced old commercial sugarcane varieties. Respondent farmers prioritized high tonnage, early maturity, pest resistance, ratoonability, high tillering and disease resistance as the top preferred attributes of sugarcane varieties. Based on the farmers’ perception, an association between farmers preferred sugarcane attributes and acceptability of the improved sugarcane varieties was established. Improved sugarcane varieties that portrayed compatible attributes with farmers’ preferred traditional varieties were found to be highly acceptable for production by farmers. Compatibility of improved sugarcane technologies with the farmers’ perceived needs, preferences and values therefore need to be considered in the development of improved sugarcane technologies to enhance their appropriateness and acceptance by farmers. Findings from this study would avail critical information in sugarcane research and development which may serve as a guide to technology developers to ensure technologies produced meet preferences of the targeted user for enhanced technology acceptance.
References
Abukhzam, M., & Lee, A. (2010). Workforce attitude on technology adoption and diffusion. The Built & Human Environment Review. abukhzam@pgr.salford.ac.uk and a.lee@salford.ac.uk
Abura, G.O., Gikunda, R.M., & Nato, N.G. (2013). Technical knowledge and information gaps among smallholder farmers in the production of sugarcane in Kakamega County, Kenya. IJASRT in EESs, 3(4), 199-207.
Adesina A.A & Baidu-Forson J. (1995). Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics 13, 1-9. SSDI 0169-5150(95)01142
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority (AFFA, 2016). Sugar Directorate.
Agrocharts, (2014). Kenya sugar annual. www.agrochart.com
Aldosari F., Kassem H.S., Khodran H., Al-Zahrani, Al-Zaidi A., Baig M.B., (2017). Factors Influencing Attitudes of Female Students towards Farming: A Case Study. Agriculture and Forestry Journal: 1 pp. 68-72. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1133250
Barua, P. (2016). Factors Affecting Technology Adoption among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Tanzania. Research Gate. Sustainable International Development. https://www.researchgate.net
Conroy, C., & Sutherland A. (2014). Participatory technology development with resource poor farmers: Maximising impact through the use of recommendations domains. Agricultural Research & Extension Network. Network paper No.133. UK
Food and Agriculture Organization (2019). FAO Land & Water. Sugarcane www.fao.org/Land&water/sugarcane.html.
Food and Agriculture Organization, (2010). Crop production. methodology for PLEC-Tanzania. PLEC Tanzania Progress Reports.
Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, (2019). Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization. Sugar Research Institute. E-Repository. www.kalro.org/sugar
Kenya Sugar Board. (2014). Cane Census 2013/14- 14/15 Report.
Kenya Sugar Research Foundation, (2014, June). Newly released varieties, KESREF digest 7 (4).
Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. (2012). Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. A framework for the production, certification and distribution of seed cane in the Kenya sugar industry. Kisumu, Kenya.
Kshirsagar K.G., Pandey S., and Bellon M.R., (2002). Farmer Perceptions, Varietal Characteristics and Technology Adoption: A Rainfed Rice Village in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(13), pp. 1239-1246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4411927
Lihasi, L.K., Onyango C. & Ochola W., (2016). Analysis of Smallholder Sugarcane Farmers’ Livelihood Assets in Relation to Food Security in Mumias Sub-County Kenya. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development.Vol.7, No.20 www.iiste.org
Mnisi, M.S., & Dlamini C. S. (2012). The concept of sustainable sugarcane production: Global, African and South African perceptions. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7 (31), 4337-4343. http://www.academicjournals.org
Murphy R. (2017). Sugarcane: Production Systems, Uses and Economic Importance. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Mwanga D., Ong’ala J., Orwa G.(2017). Modeling Sugarcane Yields in the Kenya Sugar Industry: A SARIMA Model Forecasting Approach. International Journal of Statistics and Applications, 7(6): 280-288. DOI: 10.5923/j.statistics.20170706.02
Sa’ari J.R., Jabar J., Tahir M.H., Mahpoth M.H., (2017).Farmer’s acceptance towards sustainable farming technology. Science-Gate International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 4(12) 2017. Pp: 220-225, Malaysia. http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS.html
Smith, E. S., & Ulu C., 2012. Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and Quality. Operation research, 60 (2), 262-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.1035
Tena E., Mekbib F., Shimelis H., & Mwadzingeni L., (2016). Sugarcane production under smallholder farming systems: Farmers preferred traits, constraints and genetic resources. Journal Cogent Food & Agriculture . 2(1) .https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1191323
The Research Advisors, (2006). http://research-advisors.com/
Toledano B.I. (2017). Farmers’ preferences and the factors affecting their decision to improve maize crops in Mexico. Institutional repository Upcommons. Institute of sustainability. Universitat politècnica de Catalunya. Spain http://upcommons.upc.edu/tesis
Wale E. and Yalew A. (2007). Farmers' Variety Attribute Preferences: Implications for Breeding Priority Setting and Agricultural Extension Policy in Ethiopia. African Development Review Volume19, Issue 2 Pages 379-396 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2007.00167.x
Zhao, D. & Li Y. (2015). Climate change and sugarcane production: Potential impact and mitigation strategies. International Journal of Agronomy,10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
