Assessment of women food vending and local soap making micro enterprises in Temeke Municipal: A Costs Benefit Analysis approach

Authors

  • Christina Shimba
  • Kepha Luvinga
  • Simon Augustine Kilasara Tengeru Institute of Community Development P O Box 1006, ARUSHA - TANZANIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.66.6600

Abstract

This paper was designed to assess the contribution of women entrepreneurship in improving household livelihood at Temeke municipal council in Dar es salaam region, specifically the study aimed to identify the types and attributes, analyse sustainability of the selected enterprises and assess the contribution of women enterprises to household livelihood in the study area. A sample of  60 women were selected randomly from a list of women entrepreneurs' groups dealing with food vending (40) and local soap making who were 20. Data were collected using structured interview and were coded and entered into computer software. Cost benefit analysis and Sustainable Livelihood Index were used to analyse the viability and contribution of food vending and local soap making enterprises. Results show that the two enterprises were viable, but local soap making is more viable than food vending. Thus it is concluded that innovative enterprises are sustainable and can improve the household livelihood. The paper recommends that the government and other stakeholders should facilitate and motivate women to embark more in innovative enterprises for enhancing their livelihoods.

Author Biography

Simon Augustine Kilasara, Tengeru Institute of Community Development P O Box 1006, ARUSHA - TANZANIA

Project Management - Lecturer

References

Albu, M. and Scott, A. (2001). Understanding livelihoods that involve micro-enterprise: markets and technological capabilities in the SL framework, Understanding livelihoods that involve micro-enterprise: markets and technological capabilities in the SL framework, Warwickshire, UK.19.

APEC Small and Medium Enterprises Working Group (2008), Models for supporting women’s micro-enterprise development; Best practices and Guidelines APEC publication Terrace Singapore.

Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analysing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development 27:12 2021-2044.

Benerias L (2006), Micro-enterprise financial Africa entrepreneurship and small business Dar es Salaam DUP ltd.

Bertrand, I. (2010), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: New Themes for Women Times. Annals of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Editorial 2010, 1: 5657.

de Beer, (2013). The informal economy, innovation and intellectual property – Concepts, metrics and policy considerations. Economic Research Working Paper No. 10,Geneva.

Fapohunda, T. (2012). Women and the Informal Sector in Nigeria: Implications for Development.

Grasmuck, Sherri and Rosario Espinal. (2000). “ Market Success or Female Autonomy? Income, Ideology, and Empowerment among Microentrepreneurs in the Dominican Republic.” Gender and Society 14:231-255.

Human Development Report (1997), Women as Entrepreneurs a formal and informal economy, Singapore.

ILO, (1972). Employment, Incomes and Equality: A Strategy for Increasing Productivity and Employment in Kenya. Geneva

Johnson, Susan and Thalia Kidder. (1999). “Globalization and Gender—Dilemmas for Microfinance Organizations.” Small Enterprise Development 10: 4-15.

Kothari C.D (2004): Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques. New Age International Publishers Limited, New Delhi, India

Kweka J, Kabelwa G, and Musa J, (2006), A background for Tanzania case study of the UTSS, Project on trade development and poverty (TDP)

Maleko C (2005), Impact of electricity services on micro enterprises in rural areas in Tanzania.

Mosley, P. and D. Hulme. (1998). ‘Microenterprise Finance: Is There a Conflict Between Growth and Poverty Alleviation?’ World Development 26: 783-790.

National Bureau of Statistics, 2007. The Integrated Labour Force Survey 2006, Dare es Salaam

Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics, 9: 2-3 33-59. nd

OECD (2004), 2 conference minister responsible for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) promotion entrepreneurship and innovative SMEs in global

Olomi, D (2006), Unleashing entrepreneurial potential of the poor in Tanzania: Prospects challenges and ways forward working paper for presentation to the high level commission on legal empowerment of the poor.

Rakodi, C. 2013. A Livelihood Approach: Conceptual Issues and Definitions. In Rakodi, C. & Lloyd-Jones, T. (Eds) Urban Livelihoods: A People Centred Approach to Reducing Poverty. London: Earthscan.

Vandderchueren E, Wegelin and Wekwete K (1996), Programme option for urban poverty reduction: Framework for action at the municipal level, Washington DC.

Wangwe S. and Mmari, D. (2007). Promoting Micro and Small Enterprises for Inclusive Development: Managing the Transition from Informal to Formal Enterprises. Working paper presented at REPOA’s 19 Annual Research Workshop held on April 09-10at the Ledger Plaza Bahari Beach Hotel, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.United Nation (2005), Investigation in the development a practical plan to Archive Millennium Development Goal, New York.

World Bank Group (2007). Voices of Women Entrepreneurs in Tanzania. International Finance Corporation, Washington, D.C. 36pp.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-18

How to Cite

Shimba, C., Luvinga, K., & Kilasara, S. A. (2019). Assessment of women food vending and local soap making micro enterprises in Temeke Municipal: A Costs Benefit Analysis approach. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.66.6600