Great Powers and the Quest for Hegemony in the Contemporary International System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.66.6686Abstract
In global politics, the role as well as rise and fall of Great Powers, which often lead to the structural transformation in the international system have undoubtedly been at the heart of international political discourse. Soon after the Cold War, international system witnessed a transition from bipolar to unipolar system of hegemony, in which the United States-led Western coalition largely set and enforced the rules of the international order. However, later on, the global system eventually returned to a state of sharper and more explicit great-power competition. This study identifies states that vie for Great Power status in the contemporary world politics and explore their relative military, economic and other resources necessary for a state to be recognized as highly independent Great Power. The paper argues that although a number of states, particularly Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom and Germany represent global economic powers, American preponderance in each of the core components of state power - military, economic, political and technological, dwarf those of other nations. This has had far-reaching implications on the international system and the world at large. With the decline in the American hyper-supremacy, other nations should be able to duplicate the overall reach and influence of the United States – in terms of economic, military, political and technological powers. Hence, the polycentric world with several power centre will ensure stability in the contemporary world order.
References
Adelman, J. (2017). Thinking the unthinkable: Russia has re-emerged as great power. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com.
Armstrong, D. (1999). Law, justice and the idea of world society. International Affairs, 75(3), 547-562.
Art, R. J. & Jervis R. (Eds.) (1973). International Politics: Anarchy, Force, Imperialism, Boston: Little, Brown.
Aslam, W. (2013). The United States and Great Power Responsibility in International Society: Drones, rendition and invasion. New York: Routledge.
Basu, R. (2004). The United Nations: Structure and functions of an International Organisation. Revised Edition. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd.
Bridge, F. R. & Bullen, R. (2005). Great Powers and the European States System, 1918 - 1914. Second Edition. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.
Buzan, B. & Little, B. (1999). Beyond Westphalia? Capitalism after the Fall, In M. Cox, K. Booth and T. Dunne (Eds.) The Interregnum: Controversies in World Politics 1989 - 1999. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-104.
Carr, E. H. (1939, 1964). The Twenty Years' Crisis, New York: Harper and Row.
Claude Jr, I. L. (1971). Sword into Plowshares: The Problem and Progress of International Organization, 4th Edition. New York: Random House.
Danilovic, V. (2002). When The Stakes are High: Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Donnelly, J. (2004). Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eminue, O. (2012). International System and its Actors: An Appraisal In: A. E. Ekpe, M. B. Abasiattai and O. Akpan (Eds.). An Introduction to International Studies and World Politics. Yaounde: Book House, pp.201-241.
Ezirim, G. E. and Dickson, M. (2012). Unilateralism and the United States’ use of Force in the Post-Cold War World: A Critique. Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2):147-159
Fischer, M. (1992). Feudal Europe, 800 - 1300": Communal discourse and conflictual practices, International Organization, 46(2): 427-466
Griffiths, M. & O' Callaghan, T. (2007). Realism, In R. Devetak, A. Burke and J. George (Eds.). An Introduction to International Relations: An Australian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54-63.
Haque, M. S. (2004). The Revival of Realism in International Politics after September 11 and its Ethical Impact. In M. Evans (ed.). Ethical Theory in the Study of International Politics. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc, pp. 145-165.
Heywood, A. (2011). Global Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heywood, A. (2015). Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations. Second Edition. London: Palgrave.
IMF News (2017). Economy of Germany. Retrieved http://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2017/07/05/na070717.
Jackson, R. (2000). The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kennan, G. F. (1951) American Diplomacy, 1900 - 1950, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company. _______________ (2014). Anarchy and Struggle for Power. In, C. Elman and M. A. Jensen (eds.). Realism Reader. London, New York: Routledge.
Milner, H. (1991). The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique, Review of International Studies, 17(1): 67-85
Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morris, J. (2011). How Great Britain? Power Responsibility and Britain’s future Global Role. BJPIR, 13(3): 326-347.
Nadkarni, V. (2013). Introduction In, V. Nadkarni and N. C. Noonan (eds.), Emerging Powers in Comparative Perspective: The Political and Economic Rise of the BRIC Countries. New York, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 1-21.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, N.Y.: Public Affairs.
Osterud, O. (1992). Regional Great Power In, I. B. Newmann (ed.). Regional Great Powers in International Politics. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 1-15.
Rich, P. B. (2009). Russia as a Great Power. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 20:2,276-299.
Saposky, H. M. (2009). US Military Doctrines sine the Cold War. Retrieved https://www.e.ir.info.2009/05/06/usmilitary-doctrine-since-the-cold-war.
Schwarzenberger, G. (1941). Power Politics, New York: Prager.
Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereign in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spykman, N. (1942). America's Strategy in World Politics: the United States and the Balance of Power, New York: Harcourt, Brace &World.
Tank, P. (2012). The Concept of Rising Power. Norwegian Peace-building Resource Centre. p.1.
Thompson, S. (2017). Is British still a World Power? Retrieved https://www.quora.com.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
Watson, A. (2009). The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London, New York: Routledge.
Wight, M. (1964). Power Politics, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Archer, Clive (2001). International Organizations, Third Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Holsti, K. J. (1995). International Politics: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Modelski, G. (1961) Agraria and Industria: Two models of the International System. In Knorr, Klaus & Verba, Sidney (eds.).The International System: Theoretical Essays. London: Palgrave.
Ranke, L. (1950). The Great Powers, In, T. H. von Laue, Ranke (eds.) The Formative Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schuman, F. L. (1933). International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
