What Holds Women Back in Academic Leadership Positions: A Case Study in The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Authors

  • Maram Salah Jaradat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.62.5967

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover the challenges preventing women from advancing in academic leadership positions. It also investigated the scope of support and acceptance of women as leaders in their workplace including administration. The study was conducted in a private university in the United Arab Emirates using a quantitative online survey. The data were collected from 115 academic women including (68) working in administrative positions and (47) in non-administrative positions.. The results showed that the most significant challenges women in leadership positions face are lack of colleagues’ support (.515**), men not accepting women as leaders (.467**), society not accepting women as leaders (.389**) and lack of confidence in women (.389**).

References

Adkins, K. (2006). Glass ceiling not cracked for executives. American Society for Training & Develo`pment, 60(6), 16

Al-Jaradat, M. K. M (2014). Challenges facing women academic leadership in secondary schools of Irbid educational area. International Educational Studies Journal, 7(5), 147-160.

Appelbaum, S., Shapiro, B., Didus, K., Luongo, T. & Paz, B. (2013). Upward mobility for women managers: Styles and perceptions: Part two. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(2), 110-118. doi:10.1108/00197851311309552

April, K., Dreyer, S., & Blass, E. (2007). Gender impediments to the South African executive boardroom. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 31(2), 51-67.

Aryee, S., Srinivas, E.S., & Tan, H.H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132-46.

Batinic, B., Reips, U., & Bosnjak, M. (2002). Online social sciences. Seatle, USA: Hogrefe & Hubber Publisher.

Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Pipeline’s broken promise – The promise of future leadership: A research program on highly talented employees in the pipeline. Retrieved July 27, 2018 from https://www.catalyst.org/system/files/Pipeline%27s_Broken_Promise_Final_021710.pdf

CIA report (2013). Director’s advisory group on women in leadership: Unclassified report. Retrieved July 25, 2018 from https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/CIA_Women_In_Leadership_March2013.pdf

Desvaux, G., Devillard-Hoellinger, S., & Baumgarten, P. (2007). Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. France: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved July 29, 2018 from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/women-matter-oct-2007

Gay, L., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. NJ: Pearson Education.

Hopkins, M. M, O’Neil, D. A., Passarelli, A., & Bilimoria, D. (2008). Women's leadership development strategic practices for women and organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(4), 348-365. Retrieved July 26, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232509932_Women's_leadership_development_strategic_practices_for_women_and_organizations th

Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2003). Exploring corporate strategy (6 ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.

Leden, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, & F., Wallon, G. (2007). A persistent problem: Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 982-7.

Lundberg, U., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1999). Stress and workload of men and women in high-ranking positions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(2),142-51. Retrieved November 22, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13085223_Stress_and_workload_of_men_and_women_in_highranking_positions

Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2005). Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out” revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 106–123.

Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2006). The opt-out revolt: Why people are leaving companies to create kaleidoscope careers. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Manz, H., and Rossman, G. (2002). Promoting women. EMBO Reports, 3(1), 5–8.

Misquitta, F. M. (2016). Women in leadership: Comparing issues in a developed versus a developing economy. Master Thesis, Auckland University.

Mwangi, M. (2012). Challenges facing women in managerial positions at the Standard Group Limited. Master Thesis, University of Nairobi. Retrieved July 27, 2018 from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/12697/Njoki_Challenges%20Facing%20Women%20in%20Managerial%20Positions%20at%20the%20Standard%20Group%20Limited.pdf?sequence=6

Paavo, A. (2006, Spring). Union workload: A barrier to women surviving labour-movement leadership. Just Labour, 8, 1-9. Retrieved November 22, 2018 from http://www.justlabour.yorku.ca/volume8/pdfs/01%20Paavo%20Press.pdf

Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-84.

Ruderman, M. N., & Ohlott, P. J. (2005). Leading roles: What coaches of women need to know. Leadership in Action, 25, 3–9.

Sturges, J. (1999). What it means to succeed: Personal conceptions of career success held by male and female managers at different ages. British Journal of Management, 10, 239–252.

Ward, S. (2018). Leadership definition: What is leadership? and can you learn to be a good leader?. Retrieved July 25, 2018 from https://www.thebalancesmb.com/leadership-definition-2948275

Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, C. J., & Pittenger, D. J. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press. rd

Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3 ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-10

How to Cite

Jaradat, M. S. (2019). What Holds Women Back in Academic Leadership Positions: A Case Study in The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.62.5967