Developing English Learning Model Project Based Content And Language Integrated Learning (Clil) For English At University Level In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.511.5525Abstract
This study explores project based content language integrated learning (CLIL) executed at a higher education insitution in Lampung Indonesi. The research was proposed based on a mixture of the principle of language integrated learning (CLIL) and the principle of project based learning. The design was implemented for the teaching of English as a compulsory subject at Istitute of Technology Sumatera. Quantitative data was obtained from the teaching before and after CLIL model application. While the qualitative data was obtained from the output of language produced by students during the learning process took place The results showed that project based CLIL English language course at the Istitute of Technology Sumatera could work effectively.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching,and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York:Longman.
Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course CLIL module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543-562.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning:cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, California: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. and Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Section. Evaluation Project. Applied Linguistics, 31, 418-442.
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31-42.
Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5(1), 3-18.
Jones, B. F., Rasmussen, C. M., & Moffitt, M. C. (1997). Real-life problem solving.: Acollaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Miller, P. C. 2006. Integrating second language into project-based instruction. In project-based learning in second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future, ed. G.H. Beckett and P.C. Miller, 225–40. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Stoller, F. 2006. Establishing a theoretical foundation for projectbased learning in second and foreign language contexts. In Projectbased second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future, ed. G.H. Beckett and P.C. Miller, 19–40. Greenwich, CT: Information Age
Thomas, J. W. & Mergendoller, J. R. (2000). Managing project-based learning: Principles from the field. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., and Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching Language in Context Third Edition. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle Thomson Learning Huzairin, et al 2017. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Content And Language Integrated Learning (Clil) Berbasis Project Mata Kuliah Bahasa Inggris Di Perguruan Tinggi. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Lampung.
Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of Teaching Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kumaradivelu, B. (2001). Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 27-48.
Robinson, R. D., McKenna, M. C., dan Wedman, J. M. (Eds.) (2000). Issues and Trends in Literacy Education Second Edition. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
BIODATA Huzairin Djahri attained his M.Pd at IKIP Malang, East Java. He has been a lecturer at the English Study Program, the faculty of teaching and education, Universitas Lampung since 1986. His subjects areas included vocabulary teaching, micro teaching, and cross cultural understanding. His area of interests comprise the teaching of vocabulary, semantics, and pragmatics Basturi Hasan accomplished his under graduate study (S-1) at FKIP Universitas Lampung and pursued his DIP TEFL Program at the University of Sydney Australia, and attained his M.Pd at IKIP Malang, East Java. He has published books entitled “Refining Sentence Writing Skills for Professional and Academic Purposes: A Practical Application of Modern Rhetoric,” and “Paragraph Writing for academic Courses: A Modern Approach.” He also published several articles focusing on Errors Analysis in English and Ways to Correct Them, New Orientations in the Teaching of English as an Important New Model for the Teaching-Learning Program, TEFL Methods, Techniques, and Approaches, also Research in TEFL Skills.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
