The Effect of TRIZ (OTSM) Training on Preschoolers’ Creativity and Philosophy of Use in Beh- Bahan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.56.4423Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the effect of TRIZ training on preschoolers’ creativity and philosophy of use in Beh-Bahan, Iran. The correspondents of the study included sixty (60) boy and girl Preschoolers that were randomly selected from different kindergarten schools in Beh-Bahan, Iran. The research instrument included Ravens, progressive mattris test, Torrance’s picture creativity question air; Alhen’s reasoning skill question air and TRIZ (OTSM) training method of inventive problem solving. The preschoolers were assimilated with Raven’s progressive matris test. The selected sixty (60) correspondents were then divided in to two groups of control and experimental groups. Both control and experimental groups were pre- tested with respect to creativity and philosophy of use, and then the experimental groups were trained by TRIZ training method for eight (8) weeks. Both control and experimental groups were post tested. After the training period, the gathered data was further examined by t- test, and analyzed by SPSS statistical tools. The findings of the study showed that: The posttest mean score and t-test value of both preschoolers’ creativity and philosophy of use differed significantly from those of pre- test. This indicated that TRIZ (OTSM) training of inventive problem solving had significant effect on both preschoolers’ creativity and philosophy of use.
References
Affrooz, Gholam- Ali. (2008). intelligence and Creativity, University of Tehran, Publication.
Altshuller, G. (1946). The Theory of inventive problem solving. Founder.
Allen, T. (1988). Doing with children. Journal of Thinking. 7(3), 35-44.
Barak, Moshe. & Mesika, Pnina. (2007). Teaching methods for inventive problemsolving in junior high school. Journal of Thinking skill and Creativity, 2, 19-29.
Fisher, R. (2000). Philosophy in Primary Schools. Fostering thinking skills and literacy. Reading, literacy and language, 35(2); 67- 73.
JeanOiaget, the philosophy of the child, 1905
Kannengiesser, Udo., Williams, Christopher & Gero, John S. (2012).what do the concept generation techniques of TRIZ, morphological analysis and brainstorming have in common. TRIZ Journal. (182).45-89. khomenko, N. (2006). Why TRIZ and OTSM? What Are TRIZ and OTSM. http://www.TRIZ- Journa.com.
Kiely, Thomas. (1993). the idea makers: importance of creativity training in business. Technology Review, January. 96. (1).
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education, Cambridge University Press.
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol.5, Issue 6 June-2018
Marshi, M;, Rahimi-Nasab, Haetol(2004) the possibility to teach philosophy to children, innovative teaching publication No 48.
Marsh, D., Waters, F., & Mann, D. (2002). Using TRIZ to Resolve Educational Delivery Conflicts Inherent to Expelled Students in Penns lvania. TRIZ Journal. 2(71). 1-11.
Parnes, S. J. (1961). Effects of extended effort in creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 117- 122.
Pelt, A. V. & Hey, J. (2011). Using TRIZ and human-centered design for consumer product development. Procedia Engineering, 9,688.693.
Pestel, Beverly C. (1997). Interactive clasroon. Jcst.sep/oct
Rawlinson.J. Geoffrey. (1989). creative Thinking and Brainstorming. Wild wood House. House.
Ton-ance.E.P. (1974). Norms-technical manual Torrance test of creative thinking .minisota press.
Ugur, S. & Ozge, 0. (2009). the effectiveness of the Creative Reversal Act.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
