Qualitative And Comparisonal Evalution of Dimentionas of University Professors through 360 Digree Thechnique

Authors

  • Mostafa Jafari
  • Mina Afshari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.56.4679

Abstract

New  days  , there are  many  evolution in knowledge of management  , being of system  of available  is unavoidable ,that  absence of it is   in dimension of different "s organization ,level of management ,personal   as  one  of  banner of  malady  "s organization . Operation assess pattern degree 360 is signal of wind age operation. And in it is main development of lead quality & development management. This process is perfect cycle, that it is windward   extract all of person (supervisors, subalterns, and, coworkers) in different ways of lead & his management & operation endow uniformly and amiable. Target of this research professor operation examination with degree

References

Bitarfpour, Mohammad Hasan." Evaluation ( feedback ) 360 impact on improving the performance of management and organization", Andishe saraye Taavon; 2014

John way, jonz; Viliyam Berli, " 360 degree feedback strategies, approaches and ways for managers" , translate by Asghar pour , Esmaeil ; Taleghani, Gholamreza ; Sopko Press; 2001

Chang, Geloriya, Introducing 360-degree performance evaluation service organizations, translate by Zare Eshkazi, Jalaleddin, Misbah Quarterly , Year IX , Issue 36; 2002

Doulan, Sholer, Rendal S; Personnel management and human resources, translate by Tousi, Mohammad Ali, Saebi, Mohammad, Tehran, State Management Training Center, Fourth Edition, 2000. Ghorbani, Mahmood; Keramati. Mohammad Reza; Jafarian Rad , Mohammad Jafar; Evaluating employee performance , Mashhad , Toos research publications, 2003.

Mirchi, Mandana; 360-degree evaluation, the newspaper world economy; No. 2036, 2010. Iran Khodro Education Center, 360-degree assessment theory and practice. Tehran , Iran Khodro training center , Musharraf Javadi and Mohammad Hussein, the role of performance evaluation approach 360 degrees in organizational effectiveness.

Nasrjvahry born , J. mihrabs , F Bazvand , " compared to the traditional method of performance assessment and 360-degree feedback Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and its relationship with employee satisfaction " , Journal of Management Development and Transformation, page 57, 2011. . Byars, L.I & Rue, L.W. (2008). Human Resource Management: 9 Th Edition. New York: Mc GrawHill. USING 360 FEEDBACK AND THE INTEGRAL MODEL TO DEVELOP LEADERSHIP”, (CACIOPPE.R, (1999)

MACCARTY.M AND TOMAAS N CARAVAN (2001), 360 FEEDBACK AND PROCCASS: PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT AND EMPLOYEE CAREER DEVELOPMENT”, JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, PP.5-3

Snell, S. A & Bohlander, G. W. (2007). Managing Human Resources. Thomson Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-27

How to Cite

Jafari, M., & Afshari, M. (2018). Qualitative And Comparisonal Evalution of Dimentionas of University Professors through 360 Digree Thechnique. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.56.4679