Unequal status of equal peoples: Causes and ways to address the problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4425Abstract
Pondering over the situation in the world, and over the nature of the relations between peoples and causes of the conflicts, it is impossible not to see that the States and ruling in them circles are the source of many of them, as a rule the most negative and destructive. An impression forms here that the real politics of these ‘institutions for the protection of human and peoples ' rights, as well as their security’ (Jefferson), aims to erect on the smooth way to the humankind’s and people’s free development all sorts of bumps and obstacles, which they then ‘heroically overcome’, calling it a ‘global politics’. The main reasons for disharmony in international life and conflicts in the world so far remain inequality of individuals and peoples, and attempts of some States to perpetuate this status, on the one hand, and a natural aspiration of peoples to equality, autonomy and progress, on the other. In the article, whose author is the philosopher of history, politics and law, is shown the causes for multi-directional activities of the peoples and their States, civil and political societies, as well as possible ways to solve them. Management of global processes in accordance with the will of the peace-loving and creative labor peoples and humanity as a whole, rather than of narrow groups of politicians, traditionally guiding by the principle ‘divide and rule’, is considered as the best way to.
References
Carneiro R. (1970). A Theory of the Origin of the State. Science, № 169 (3947), pp. 733–738.
Cassel Allan. (2001) Ideology and international relations in the modern world. Taylor & Francis, 2003. The Declaration of Independence. The Want, Will, and Hopes of the People. URL: http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION/document/The so-called 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation was not approved, by "more than half of the citizens, included in the electoral lists," as the law ‘On referendum’ (1990) required. In 13 of 21 Republic, 19 of 55 areas and two autonomous districts of the Russian Federation, most of the citizens had voted against the Constitution’s draft, and in 86 subjects of the Federation it was approved by less the half citizens, but nevertheless it was declared entered into force. By whom and on what basis was done this? Definitely legal scholars, considering that "in Russia there is no legitimate political power, ... Constitutional rights remain insufficiently implemented in Russia today” are right? [Steven Holmes. To what Russia teaches us today? //Constitutional law: Eastern European review, 1997, no. 3-4 c. 195].
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49). URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/hr_bill.shtml.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Nineteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.
Hobbes T. The English Works, vol. III. (Leviathan) [1651]. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 2011. 378 p Carl Schmitt, Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes: Sinn und Fehlschlag eines politischen Symbols (1938; Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1995).
Kennan G. (1952) American Diplomacy (New York: New American Library). 120 p.
Schlesinger Arthur, Jr. The Necessary Amorality of Foreign Affairs. Harper's Magazine 243, no. 1,455 (August 1971), pp. 72 — 73.
Spykman N. (1942). America’s Strategy in World Politics, New York. Harcourt.
Mutagirov D. Z. law’s aspects of ethno political crisis // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. 2015. Issue 6, no. 1. pp. 14 - 24).
Rights and Duties of States-Convention Signed at Montevideo, December 26, 1933. Source: U.S., Department of State, Publication 1983, Peace and War: United States Foreign Policy, 1931-1941(Washington, D.C.: U.S., Government Printing Office, 1943, pp. 198-203.10. The Convention on the rights and duties of States (city of Montevideo, December 26, 1933). 11. Charter of the Organization of American States. URL:http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/charter.html. Access 11.09.2017.
CHARTER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (A-41). Signed in Bogotá in 1948 and amended by the Protocol of Buenos Aires in 1967, by the Protocol of Cartagena de Indias in 1985, by the Protocol of Washington in 1992, and by the Protocol of Managua in 1993.URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/charter.html
Charter of the United Nations. 1945. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/charter-united-nations/index.html.
Mutagirov D. Z. Contemporary terrorism: Nature, causes and conditions for the eradication). Politbook, 2016, № 1, pp. 44 – 66.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf. 1948. 688 p.
Agenda for Peace’, 31 January 1992, reprinted in Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury (eds.), United Nations, Divided World: The UN’s Roles in International Relations, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), Hurrel A. On Global Order. Routlage, 2005, p. 137 – 138.
Harold L Horowitz. Ethnic Groups in Conflict, 1989.
CONFERENCE ON SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE. FINAL ACT. HELSINKI 1975. URL: https://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act
Mutagirov D. Z. Democracy as a universal value. Moscow, Logos, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
