An Assessment of the Differential Calculus Textbook from the perspective of Faculty Members

Authors

  • Refat A. A. Kandeel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4526

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the Differential Calculus textbook for the Common First Year students at King Saud University from perspective of faculty members. The study sample consisted of 27 faculty members. The researcher prepared a questionnaire to assess the Differential Calculus Textbook. It consisted of four sections (introduction, method of presentation, content, and output). The study results indicated that the Differential Calculus textbook was medium level. The output textbook was the largest assessment, followed by the introduction, while the method of presentation was in the last ranking, preceded by the content. The method of presentation and content are very important when writing any textbook, so these two sections needed careful review, and continuous development and improvement based on the results of this study.

References

Aineamani, B., & Naicker, S., (2014). Mathematics textbook analysis: A guide to choosing the appropriate mathematics textbook, Pearson Holdings South Africa, AMESA - Demystifying Mathematics, 07 – V1, 11.

Albalawi, M. M., (2013). Evaluation of developed science textbook for the fourth grade primary in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from perspectives of male and female teachers, Arabic Studies in Education and Psychology - Saudi Arabia, Vol 2, no 37, 101-115.

Alghamdi, M. S., (2014). Evaluation of Developer First Secondary Grade Math Book in Saudi Arabia In Light Of the Total Quality Standards for Textbook, Journal of reading and knowledge, Egypt, no 152, 217-287.

Alhumaid, G. M., (2011). Evaluation of the art textbook for the fourth grade of primary in light of the global data of textbook in Saudi Arabia, Journal of reading and knowledge – Egypt, no 121, 19-56.

Alshara, A. A., (2010). An evaluation of the new 8th grade mathematics textbook from male and female teachers' point of view, Journal of Faculty of Education Mansoura, Egypt, Vol 1, no 72, 214-247.

Altal, W. A., & Al-mestarihi, M. M. (2012). The Degree of Consideration of Q uality Standard for Selecting the University Text-book at the Faculty of Education, King Abdul Aziz University: that is from the Staff Members' Viewpoint, Mu'tah Research and Studies - Humanities and Social Sciences, Jordan, Vol 27, no 2, 379-418.

Aseeri, M. M., (2015). An Evaluation of the Developed Mathematics Textbook for the 3rd Secondary Grade from Male and Female Teachers’ Perspectives in Najran City, Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, Bahrain,

Awasthi, R. J., (2006). Textbook and its evaluation. Journal of NELTA, 11(1-2), 1-10.

Chiappeta, E.L. Fillman, D.A., & Sethna, G.H., (1991). A Method to quantify major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, (8), 713- 725.

Cunningsworth, A., (1995). Choosing your Coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann ELT.

Diab, S., (2004). The quality of mathematics textbooks in the Palestinian curriculum. Conference of Education in Palestine and the recent changes, 23 - 24/11/2004, Faculty of Education, Islamic University: Gaza.

Farag-allah, A. M., (2011). Evaluate the maths book for the human science twelve grade in Gaza governates from the teahers perspective point of view in the lights of quality standards, Journal of the Islamic University for Human Research - Scientific Research and High Studies at the Islamic University, Gaza, Palestine, Vol 19, no 2, 734-776.

Hussien, A. S., (2014). Evaluating First-grade Secondary Maths Books: Teachers’ Perspective, Educational Magazine, Kuwait, Vol 28, no 110, 399-453.

Kajander, A., & Lovric, M., (2009) Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40:2, 173-181.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds), (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press. Pp 115-155.

Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, B.M., (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3 – 40), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nguyen, C. T., (2015). An Evaluation of the Textbook English 6: A case study from secondary schools in the Mekong Delta Provinces of Vietnam, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Thesis submitted to the University Of Sheffield For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy.

Richards, J. C., (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Cambridge University Press.

Sarem, S. N., Hamidi, H., & Mahmoudie, R., (2013). A Critical Look at Textbook Evaluation: A Case Study of Evaluating an ESP Course-Book: English for International Tourism, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, ISSN 2251-838X / Vol, 4 (2): 372-380.

Sunday, A. S., (2014). Mathematics textbook analysis: A study on recommended Mathematics textbooks in school USE in Southwestern states of Nigeria, European Scientific Journal, September 2014 /special/ edition Vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881.

Tomlinson, B., (2003). Materials evaluation, in Tomlinson, B. (ed.). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum, pp.15-36.

Tok, H., (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives, Educational Research and Review Vol. 5 (9), pp. 508-517.

Weir, C., & Roberts, J., (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-17

How to Cite

Kandeel, R. A. A. (2018). An Assessment of the Differential Calculus Textbook from the perspective of Faculty Members. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4526