Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Closure and Compliance of Spouses in Relationship Conflict

Authors

  • roni laslo roth Peres Academic Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3684

Keywords:

Emotion regulation, conflict, compliance, cognitive closure

Abstract

This study was aimed to examine the relationships between emotion regulation and compliance among spouses in conflict. Furthermore, because compliance in conflict situations has been associated with individual differences in cognitive closure and emotions, we examined how these factors modulate the effect of emotion regulation on compliance. To this end, 70 praticipates, randomly assigned to reappraisal and control groups, reported the influence tactics they would comply, their affective state and their cognitive closure level. Results indicated that as compared to control, reappraisal strengthened the tendency to comply during conflict and that this effect was stronger among participants with low cognitive closure. Moreover, the interaction between emotion regulation and cognitive closure on harsh influence tactics was mediated by inward-directed negative affect, suggesting that the reappraisal instruction promoted better resiliency to negative affect among high cognitive closure participants. We discuss the role of emotion regulation techniques in treatment and in interpersonal relationships. 

Author Biography

roni laslo roth, Peres Academic Center

Lecturer at the School of Behavioral Sciences.

Running head: EMOTION REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE

 

Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Closure and Compliance of Spouses in Relationship Conflict

 

Roni Laslo-Roth1,2Eyal Rosenstreich1 

1School of behavioral Sciences, Peres Academic Center, Rehovot, Israel

2SCE - Shamoon College of Engineering, Ashdod, Israel

 

 

Corresponding author:

Roni Laslo-Roth, Ph.D.

School of Behavioral Sciences, Peres Academic Center

10 Peres St., Rehovot, Israel

Email: roniro@ac.sce.ac.il

Tel: 972-773337798

 

 

 

 

Abstract

This study was aimed to examine the relationships between emotion regulation and compliance among spouses in conflict. Furthermore, because compliance in conflict situations has been associated with individual differences in cognitive closure and emotions, we examined how these factors modulate the effect of emotion regulation on compliance. To this end, 70 praticipates, randomly assigned to reappraisal and control groups, reported the influence tactics they would comply, their affective state and their cognitive closure level. Results indicated that as compared to control, reappraisal strengthened the tendency to comply during conflict and that this effect was stronger among participants with low cognitive closure. Moreover, the interaction between emotion regulation and cognitive closure on harsh influence tactics was mediated by inward-directed negative affect, suggesting that the reappraisal instruction promoted better resiliency to negative affect among high cognitive closure participants. We discuss the role of emotion regulation techniques in treatment and in interpersonal relationships.

Keywords: Emotion regulation, conflict, compliance, cognitive closure.

 

 

References

Bélanger, J. J., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2015). Social power tactics and subordinates’ compliance at work: The role of need for cognitive closure. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 163-169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.05.001

Ben-Naim, S., Einav, M., Laslo-Roth, R. & Margalit, M. (In press). Hope in the Family: Individual Differences in Parenting Stress, Personal Resources and Coping. In Cohen, F. L (Eds.). Hope: Individual Differences, Role in Recovery and Impact on Emotional Health. Nova Science Publishers, NY. Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: why you see them and why you don’t. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 440-446.

Bugental, D. B., & Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51-64.

Bui, K. V. T., Raven, B. H., & Schwarzwald, J. (1994). Influence strategies in dating relationship: the effects of relationship satisfaction, gender, and perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 429 – 442.

Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295-318. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295.

Burton, J. (1990). Conflict: Human needs theory. Springer.

Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R., & Serpe, R. T. (2001). A competence-based approach to examining interpersonal conflict test of a longitudinal model. Communication Research, 28(1), 79-104. doi: 10.1177/009365001028001003.

Cutuli, D. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8. 175doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175

De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025003007

De Rivera, J. H., (1977). A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.

De Rivera J. H., & Grinkis, C. (1986). Emotions as social relationships. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 351-369. doi:10.1007/BF00992109.

De Rivera, J. H., Possell, L., Verette, J. A., & Weiner, B. (1989). Distinguishing elation, gladness and joy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1015-1023.

Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 39-66.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Paris: Maison de Sciences de l'Homme.

Golec, A., & Federico, C. M. (2004). Understanding Responses to Political Conflict: Interactive effects of the Need for Closure and Salient Conflict Schemas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 750-762.

Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 5-22. doi:10.2307/353438

Gottman, J., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477. doi:10.2307/350902.

Gratz, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2010). Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance-and mindfulnessbased treatments. Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change, 107-133.

Gross, J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224.

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291. doi: 10.1017/S0048577201393198

Igbo, H. I., Grace, A. R., & Christiana, E. O. (2015). Relationship between Duration of Marriage, Personality Trait, Gender and Conflict Resolution Strategies of Spouses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 490-496. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.032

Kamphuis, J. H., & Telch, M. J. (2000). Effects of distraction and guided threat reappraisal on fear reduction during exposure-based treatments for specific fears. Behaviour research and therapy, 38(12), 1163-1181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00147-3

Kirchler, E. (2001). Conflict and decision-making in close relationships: Love, money, and daily routines. Psychology Press.

Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001). The power interaction model: theory, methodology and empirical application. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power. (pp. 195 – 214). PA: Psychology Press.

Koslowsky, M. & Schwarzwald, J. (2009). Power tactics preference in organizations: Individual and situational factors. In D. Tjosvold & B. von Kipppenberg (Eds.), Power and independence in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koval, P., Butler, E. A., Hollenstein, T., Lanteigne, D., & Kuppens, P. (2014). Emotion regulation and the temporal dynamics of emotions: Effects of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression on emotional inertia. Cognition & Emotion, 29(5), 831-851. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.948388.

Kruglanski, A.W.(2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.

Laslo-Roth, R, & Schwarzwald, J. (2016). Rationale and emotion in the selection of influence tactics by managers in conflict with subordinates. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(1), 42-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2014-0076

Lipovetzky, N., Hod, H., Roth, A., Kishon, Y., Sclarovsky, S., & Green, M. S. (2007). Emotional Events and Anger at the Workplace as Triggers for a First Event of the Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Case-Crossover Study. IMAJ, 9, 310-315.

Montes, C., Rodríguez, D., & Serrano, G. (2012). Affective choice of conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(1), 6-18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10444061211199304.

Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 1-50. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22002-9.

Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Revised need for cognitive closure scale. Unpublished manuscript, Università di Roma, La Sapienza.

Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217 – 244.

Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Raven, B. H. (2012). Motivational underpinnings of social influence in work settings: Bases of social power and the need for cognitive closure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 41-52. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.836.

Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x

Ray, R. D., Ochsner, K. N., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Gabrieli, J. D., & Gross, J. J. (2005). Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 156-168.

Reeck, C., Ames, D. R., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). The social regulation of emotion: An integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(1), 47-63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.003

Richards, J. M., Butler, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). Emotion regulation in romantic relationships: The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), 599-620. doi: 10.1177/02654075030205002

Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Allouf, M. (2005). Group membership, status, and social power preference. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 644-655. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02139.x

Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Ben Izhak-Nir, E. B. (2008). Gender role ideology as a moderator of the relationship between social power tactics and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 59(9-10), 657-669. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9454-y.

Shan, J. Y., Kruglanski, A.W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership Has Its (Epistemic) Rewards: Need for Closure Effects on In-Group Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 383-393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.383

Stifter, C. A., Spinrad, T., & Braungart-Rieker, J. (1999). Toward a developmental model of child compliance: The role of emotion regulation in infancy. Child Development, 70(1), 21-32. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00003

Tal, A., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (2015). Power preference of bank managers in conflicts with subordinates. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(2), 126-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-01-2013-0005.

Trautwein, F. M., Naranjo, J. R., & Schmidt, S. (2016). Decentering the self? Preliminary evidence for changes in self-vs. other related processing as a long-term outcome of loving-kindness meditation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1785. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01785.

Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2004). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(4), 510-528. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(6), 1049. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049

Downloads

Published

2017-09-25

How to Cite

roth, roni laslo. (2017). Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Closure and Compliance of Spouses in Relationship Conflict. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(18). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3684