ODL: Online Distance Learning of Quantitative Courses in Higher Education

Authors

  • Yaron Ghilay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3698

Abstract

The study examined a new asynchronous model for online learning of quantitative courses in higher education, which is a complete substitute for face-to-face learning. The model is called ODL (Online Distance Learning) and is based on a combination of the following successful previous models. 1. CTBL: Comprehensive Technology-Based Learning (Ghilay, 2017). 2. FBL: Feedback Based Learning (Ghilay & Ghilay, 2015a). 3. OTLA: Online Teaching, Learning and Assessment (Ghilay & Ghilay, 2013). The study is based on two samples of students who attended college and participated in an ODL-based course  and face-to-face learning of the same course. Students who participated the ODL course, were asked to answer a questionnaire focused on three areas: the course components, characteristics of learning process and time investment. Besides, achievements of the ODL course were compared to the same course in a face to face format. The research reveals that according to students' views, the new model is very helpful for their studying process. Beyond that, it was found that achievements in the ODL course were at least equal to those of a face-to-face course. The results indicate that it is worthwhile to adopt the new model in institutions of higher education.  

References

Burksaitiene, N. (2011). Promoting student learning through feedback in higher education. Societal Studies, 4(1), 33-46.

Croton, B. A., Willis, J. E. & Fish, J. D. (2014). PassNote: A Feedback Tool for Improving Student Success Outcomes. Teaching and Learning Technologies Publications. Paper 7. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/idcpubs/7

Elton, L., & Johnston, B. (2002). Assessment in universities: A critical review of research. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 2: Teaching to Promote Growth. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00817.x.

Ghilay, Y. (2017). Online Learning in Higher Education. Nova Science Publishers-New-York.

Ghilay, Y. & Ghilay, R. (2015a). FBL: Feedback Based Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Studies, 5(5), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v5n5p1

Ghilay, Y. & Ghilay, R. (2015b). Computer Courses in Higher-Education: Improving Learning by Screencast Technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 15-26.

Ghilay, Y. & Ghilay, R. (2013). OTLA: A New Model for Online Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 10-21.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

Hesse, J. (1989). From naive to knowledgeable. The Science Teacher.

Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Employability and good learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052294.

Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle, (Eds.), The Experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

McAleese, M., Bladh, A., Berger, V., Bode, C., Muehlfeit, J., Petrin, T., Schiesaro, A., & Tsoukalis, L. (2013). Report to the European commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia, M. & Jones. K (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education.

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2001). Understanding learning and teaching. The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE & OUP.

Ghilay, Y. (2017). ODL: Online Distance Learning of Quantitative Courses in Higher Education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(18) 62-

Race, P. (2005). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education. London: Sage Publications.

Ramsden, P. (2000). Learning to teach in higher education. Vilnius: Aidai.

Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: The BEAR assessment system. Higher Education, 52(4), 635-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7263-y.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-25

How to Cite

Ghilay, Y. (2017). ODL: Online Distance Learning of Quantitative Courses in Higher Education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(18). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3698