The Effects of Social Media on Literacy Development among Pupils in Junior High Schools in Ghana

Authors

  • Robert Andrews Ghanney
  • Theresa Antwi
  • Edmond Amoako Agyeman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.416.3603

Abstract

The study sought to investigate the effects of social media on literacy development among pupils in junior high schools particularly on their perception about the nature of literacy, identifying major social media network sites and their mass usage among pupils as well as the effects of social media and social networking sites on pupils’ language learning and literacy development within the context of socio-cultural and social learning theories. To achieve the objectives of this study, a case study design was used which comprised the use of interviews to solicit pupils’ responses on the effects of social media on literacy development. The population of the study consisted of all JHS pupils in the Asante-Akim South District in the Ashanti region of Ghana. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 25 pupils (14 females, 11 males) from three junior high schools. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis (qualitative content and document analyses), table with description and data triangulation. The findings showed participants’ exposure to major social media tools and social networking sites such as Facebook, Short Message Services (SMS), WhatsApp, Twitter and You Tube likewise online practices such as chatting, blogging, watching movies, listening to audios, image sharing, and so on. The study in addition revealed that social media tools and online practices influence participants’ reading skills and habits, writing skills and speaking in every way. This research recommends the strict application of Ghana Education Service rules and parental guidance on electronic devices usage in schools, homes and the promotion of social media networks for educational purposes.

 

References

Adams, M. J. (2011). Technology for developing children’s language and literacy: bringing speech recognition to the classroom. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

Ahn, J. (2011). The effect of social network sites on adolescents’ social and academic development: Current theories and controversies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.62(8), 1435—1445. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Anderson, P., & Morgan, G. (2008).Developing tests and questionnaires for a national.Assessment of educational achievement. Washington DC: World Bank.

Antilla, J. A. (2013). The effects of early literacy development on academic success in the educational setting and implications for educational leaders and teachers (Master's thesis). Retrieved from: http://www.nmu.edu, on 4th July, 2016

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York City: General Learning Press. Pp. 1-8.

Barnard, R., & Campbell, L. (2005). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. The TESOLANZ Journal, 13, 76- 88. Hamilton, New Zealand: Waikato University Press. Retrieved from: http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz

Bouhnik, D., &Deshen, M. (2014).WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 13, 217-231. California: Informing Science Institute

Bormuth, J. R. (2003). Reading literacy: Its definition and assessment.Reading Research Quarterly,9(1): 7 - 66. London: Wiley & International Reading Association.

Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring Literacy on the Internet. Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension toencompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher,5(5(5), 458-464. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cooper, S., Doonan, K., & Fawcett, N. (2012).Enterprising technology>: Using 4G technology to improve literacy skills.Retrieved from: http://escalate.ac.uk, on September 11, 2016.

Craig, D. (2003). Instant messaging: The language of youth literacy. The Boothe Prize Essays 2003. Pp. 116-133. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Family Health International (2012).Qualitative research methods: A data collector's field guide. London: Sage Publications

Hull, G. A., &Moje, E. B. (2011).Understanding language: what is the development of literacy the development of? California: Stanford University Press

Kasper, L. F. (2000). New Technologies, New Literacies: Focus Discipline Research and ESL Learning Communities. Language Learning &Technology.4(2), 105. Retrieved from: http://www.llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kasper/

Lankshear, C. J., &Knoebel, M. (2008)."Introduction: Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices’. In Colin and Michele (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 1-6, 249. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, USA.

Microsoft Encarta Dictionary (2009)."Literacy". Microsoft Student 2009 [DVD], Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation, 2008.

Owu-Ewie, C. (2011). Learn to do research: An introduction to research methods. Winneba: University of Education, Winneba. Pp.8

Rouis, S., Limayem, M. &Saheli-Sangari, E. (2011). Impact of Facebook usage on students' academic achievement: Roles of self-regulation and trust. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 9(3), No. 25, 961-994. Almeria: University of Almeria, Spain. ISSN: 1696 – 2095

Sani, I., &Bature, S. (2014). The Impact of Social Networks on ESL Undergraduate Students' Writing in Nigeria.Arts

Sarkar, A., Agarwal, S., Ghosh, A., &Nath, A. (2015). Impacts of social networks: A comprehensive study on positive and negative effects on different age groups in a society. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies.J(5), 177-190. India: IJARCSMS.

Sharma, N., &Mahavidhalaya, S. M. (2015). Impact of social media on English language: A review. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities. 3(3), 532 - 536. Bhopal, India: Support Foundation.

Smith, M. & Berge, Z. L. (2009).Social learning theory in second life.MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 439-445. California: MERLOT, California State University.

The Commonwealth Diploma in Youth Development (2007).Introduction to methodology of socicd investigations: Region specific module 14. Accra: Institute of Adult Education, University of Ghana, Legon. Pp. 13 - 14.

UNESCO (2005). Why literacy matters. Education for All (EFA) Globed Monitoring Report.UNESCO. Pp. 137-138

Van Daal, H. P. &Sandvik, J. M. (2012).The Effects of Multimedia on Early Literacy of Children at Risk: A Meta-Analysis.An EETC presentation given at the University of Stavanger. Retrieved from: http://www.lesesenteret.no

Vural, O. F. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of using social networks in higher education: A focus group study. Educational Research and Reviews. 10(8), 1147 - 1166. Ohio: Open Access, Academic Journals.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Pp. 79-91.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-04

How to Cite

Ghanney, R. A., Antwi, T., & Agyeman, E. A. (2017). The Effects of Social Media on Literacy Development among Pupils in Junior High Schools in Ghana. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.416.3603