Stylistic Imagery: The Use Of Vehicle In Similes And Metaphors In Eunice Ngongkum’s Arrows Of Treachery And The Mbatbalung Scar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.415.3240Abstract
Figures of speech are imaginative tools in ordinary communications used for explaining speech beyond its usual usage. Authors use figurative language for esthetic reasons and also, to make the reader see familiar things in a new way. This is most often used in the form of analogy to convey their massage. This study analyses similes and metaphors which are the most common figures of speech in Ngongkum’s Arrows of Treachery and The Mbatbalung Scar. It aims at analysing how the images of comparison used in the vehicles add more meaning to the overall meanings of the stories. The tenor, vehicle and ground concept and the semantic field theory are used to analyse the similes and metaphors. The study concludes that the author uses vehicles that are in context, known and understood by the audience. She makes use of hyponyms of superordinate terms like faming, animals and birds, heat, geographical features and Christian references. In grouping the lexis the readers enjoy the aesthetic value and better understand the meaning of a texts.
References
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Fadaee, E. (2011) Symbols metaphors and similes in literature:A case study of “Animal Farm.” Journal of English literature. Vol. 2(2), pp.19-27.
Fomukong, S.E.A. (2017). Stylistic Metaphor: Senses of Sight and Smell in the Works of Martin Luther King Junior and Bate Besong. Advances in Social Science Research Journal, vol.4(6), pp. 104-115.
Granger, S. & Meunier, F. (2008). Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Language, Arts and Disciplines. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Holman, C.H. (1960). A Handbook to Literature. New York: The Odyssey Press
Hussain, R. (2014). Metaphors and Similes in Literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol 3. Issue 9, Pp. 01-02.
McGlone,M.S.& Manfredi, D.A.(2001 ). Topic-vehicle interaction in Metaphor Comprehension. Memory and Cognition .Vol. 29 Issue 8 Pp 1209-1219. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206390
Kirvalidze, N. (2014). Three-Dimensional World of Similes in English Fictional Writing. Sino-US English Teaching, vol.11 (1), pp. 25-39.
Mpouli,S. & Ganascia, J.(2015 ). Investigating the stylistic relevance of adjective and verb simile markers. http://arxvi.org/ftp/arvix/papers/1511/1511.03053.pdf.
Nkongkum, E. (2012). WEN MEN NTE: Short Stories. Kansas city: Miraclaire Publishing LLC.
Richards, I.A (1974). The Philosophy of Rhetorics. New York: OUP.
Taira, T.& Kusumi, T (2011). The Topic Comprehension Process in Simile Sentences. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2011/papers/0502/paper0502.pdf.
Basics of English Studies: Analysing a Metaphor.www2.anglisk.unifreiburg.de/intranet/englishbasics/Style02.htm. The Anatomy of Metaphor and Simile. www.picl.ts.com/lessonplans/anatomy_metaphor_simile.aspx.ncyclopaedia The Editor of Encyclopaedia Britannica (1999). http://www.britannica.com/art/tenor-literature.http://www.boundless.com/communications/textbooks/wording-the-speech-11/deploying-style-effective-60/simile.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
