Investigating the Association between Ambiguity Tolerance and Vocabulary Knowledge in Iranian EFL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.412.3303Abstract
Learning a new language can be likened to the exploring of an unknown land, as there are varying ambiguous situations in the learning tasks. Ambiguity tolerance, as an important learning style, can inhibit or facilitate language learning. The present study seeks to unravel how tolerant/intolerant EFL learners are of such ambiguities as well as exploring whether tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners affects their vocabulary knowledge. The study also aimed to investigate whether there is any gender-related difference in tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners and whether ambiguity tolerance is somehow associated with self-perceived success of Iranian EFL learners in vocabulary. This study was carried out with 60 freshmen enrolled in the English Language Teaching (ELT) Department of Kazerun Islamic Azad University in Iran. The data collection instruments consisted of the Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale and the Vocabulary Levels Test. The obtained data were subsequently analyzed descriptively using the SPSS, version 21 software. The results revealed that EFL learners have a moderate level of ambiguity tolerance in foreign language learning and that gender does not have any significant impact on tolerance of ambiguity. It was also found that there is no significant relationship between tolerance of ambiguity and vocabulary knowledge whereas a significant relationship between tolerance of ambiguity and self-perceived achievement in foreign language vocabulary learning was detected. Implications based on the findings are also suggested.
References
BAŞÖZ, T. (2015). Exploring the relationship between tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners and their vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 53-66.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education Company.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles. New York: Pearson Education Company.
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality 30, 29-50.
Chapelle, C. A. (1983). The relationship between ambiguity tolerance and success in acquiring English as a second language in adult learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Illinois.
Chapelle, C. A., & Robert, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning, 36, 27-45.
Ehrman, M.E. (1993). Ego boundaries revisited: toward a model of personality and learning. In Alatis (ed.) pp. 330-362.
Ehrman, M.E. (1999). Ego boundaries and tolerance of ambiguity in second language learning. In Arnold (ed.) pp. 68-86.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ely, C. M. (1989), "Tolerance of ambiguity and use of second language learning strategies", Foreign Language Annals 22, 437-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02766.x
Ely, C. M. (1995). "Tolerance of ambiguity and the teaching of ESL", in Reid, J. (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom, Boston: Heinle & Heinle, pp. 87-95.
Erten, I., & Topkaya, E. (2009), "Understanding tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners in reading classes at tertiary level", Novitas-Royal 3(1), 29-44. [Online] Available: http://www.novitasroyal.org/vol_3_1/erten_topkaya.pdf (Feb 4, 2017)
Guiora, A. Z. (1981). Language, personality, and culture, or the Whorfian hypothesis revisited. In M. Hines, W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ‘81 (pp. 169-177). Detroit, MI: Teachers of English to Speakers of other Languages.
Grace, C. (1998). Personality type, tolerance of ambiguity, and vocabulary retention in CALL. CALICO Journal, 15 (1-3), 19-46.
Johnson, K. (2001). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Kamran, S. K. (2011). Effects of Gender on Ambiguity Tolerance of Iranian English Language Learners. Journal of Education and Practice, 2, 25-33.
Kazamia, V. (1999). "How tolerant are Greek EFL learners of foreign language ambiguities?", Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 69-78. [Online] Available: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/linguistics/WPL/WP1999/kazamia (Feb 16, 2017)
Kissau, S. (2006), "Gender differences in second language motivation: An investigation of micro- and macro-level influences", Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (2), 73-96.
Marzban, A., Barati, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2012). An Investigation into Ambiguity Tolerance in Iranian Senior EFL Undergraduates. English Language Teaching 5 (1), 76-85.
Maubach, A. M., & Morgan, C. (2001), "The relationship between gender and learning styles amongst A level modern languages students", The Language Learning Journal 23 (1), 41-47.
McLain, D.L. (1993). The MSTAT-1: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 183-189.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good second language learner (Research in Education Series No.7). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Norton, R.W. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment 39(6), 607-619
Piaget, J. (1967). Six Psychological Studies. New York: Random House.
Reiss, M. A. (1985). The good language learner: Another look. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, 511-523.
White, C. (1999), "Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language Learners", System 27, 443-4l57.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
