Communication as a Strategy for Implementing the Language-in-Education Policy in Botswana Primary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.412.3314Abstract
This paper examines the role that communication plays as a strategy for implementing the language-in-education policy (LiEP) by teachers, school management and education officers in Botswana primary schools. Communication is at the pinnacle of the implementation of the language-in-education policy. This is confirmed by the diffusion of innovation and the eagle leadership theories. If ignored, it could lead to frustration and despair amongst policy agents. This study adopted the qualitative approach with open ended questionnaires, interviews and classroom observations techniques to investigate the problem. The findings indicate that effective communication was lacking in the implementation process of the language-in-education policy and this has led to disconnectedness, detachment, burn out and frustration amongst teachers. In the light of these findings, this study suggested the development of leadership and management in education officers, school management and teachers to raise their awareness about the critical role they can play in successfully implementing the LiEP through diverse communication channels. This study concluded that there should be, a reflection and change of behaviour by both senior personnel and teachers in primary schools to achieve the objectives of the language-in-education policy.
References
Arlestig, H. (2007). Principals’ Communication Inside Schools: A Contribution to School Improvement? The Education Forum (71), 263 – 273.
Mokibelo, E. (2017). Communication as a Strategy for Implementing the Language-in-Education Policy in Botswana Primary Schools. Advances in
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Contandriopoulos, D., &Brouselle, A. (2012). Evaluation models and evaluation use. Evaluation,18 (1), 61-77. th
Covey, S.(2004). The 8 Habit – From effective to greatness. New York: Free Press.
Gray, B., & Wood, D. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27 (2), 3- 22.
Lee, C. (2016). Why School Communication Matters: A matter of Urgency, Obstacles are the entry point.
Lotitch, P. (2013). What is the impact of communication on organizational culture? The Thriving Small Business: Vision – Strategy Development Growth.
Nudzor, H.P. (2009). Re-conceptualising the paradox in policy implementation: a post-modernist conceptual approach: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30 (4), 501-513.
Skilton, E. E. (1992). Acquisition policy planning and litigation: Language planning in the context of Y.S.V. School District of Philadelphia. WPEL, 8 (2), 55-82.
Stubbs, S., Moss, S., & Papastefanou, N. (2012). Human Communication: Principles and Contexts. London: McGraw-Hill.
Patnaik, S, (2007). Communication concepts, theories and models. In Communication Models: unit 2: Listening and Communication English 9 slides – Mr Hill.
Virgilio, S. J., & Virgilio, I. R. (2001). The role of the principal in curriculum implementation. Education, 104 (4), 346 – 350.
Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum policies in the Chinese Tertiary context. Unpublished thesis. Queens University. Canada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
