Change And The Role Of Intimidation Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.44.2759Abstract
Change in an organization is not a coherent, compact process – depending on situations, psychosocial backgrounds, perception of the process by different groups of individual, but can have an asynchronous course, sometimes conflicting, with breakdowns which can have unexpected side effects, such as blocking initiatives, distortion of the correct perception of events, action paralysis, etc. Tensions and insecurities may give rise to different maladaptive behaviors. In the following are highlighted certain characteristics of the reactions of leaders in the organizational systems to the actions of some subordinated reformers as a series of intimidation rituals. Each successive “control ritual” represents an escalation of the authority’s efforts to discourage an individual (and those who might support) to continue on promoting the reform.
References
Turner, M.E., & Pratkanis, A.R., (1998), A Social identity model of group-think. Organizațional Behavior and Auman Decision Processes, 73, 210-235;
Zajonk, RB.(1980). Compresence.. in P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillschale, NJ: Erbaum;
Huguet, P., Galvaing, M.P., Monteil, I.M., & Dumas, F.(1999). Social presence effects in the stroop Lask: Forther evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 101 1-1025;
Le Bon, G.(1895). The crowd London: Ernest Benn; ASCH, S.E.(1946). Forning impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290;
Crano, W.D., & Chen, X., (1998). The lenienccy contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450;
Milgram, S.(1974). Obedience to authority an experimental view.New York: Harper & Row;
Bem, D.J.(1972). Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(vol.6). New York: Academic Press;
Zimbardo, P.G., (1972). Pathology of imprisonment. SOCIETY,9,4-8;
Myers, D.G., & Lamm,H.(1976), The group polarization phenomenon . Psychoogic Al Bulletin,83, 602-627;
Paulus, P.B.(1971). Developing consensus about group think after all these years. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 362-374.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
