Structural change in Ethiopia: is the country catching up or lagging behind?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.43.2671Abstract
Attaining a sustained economic growth is the prime objective of any nation in the entire world. Some countries potentially tackle this challenge and can register an extensive economic progress. However, this is true for some developed countries only. In many developing countries achieving a persistent economic growth is a big challenge. Similarly, Ethiopia has been struggling for alleviating different macroeconomic instabilities. The country is suffering from the problem of food security, income inequality and BOP deficit. But recently the country has launched a new approach to economic growth, the growth and transformation plan (GTP). Primarily, this plan is envisaged to transform the country in the class of lower middle income countries with zero level of carbon emission in 2025. However, still the country is still challenged by different macroeconomic maladjustments. Inflation and significant level of unemployment are currently characterizing the country’s economy. But, some reports of still the country’s government stated that the country is going on the correct path of development. This calls an investigation on the nature of structural change in the country. Therefore, this study tries to explore structural change in the economy. It is also aimed on identifying in which sector the country achieves structural change. By using the kaldor verdon coefficient, shift share analysis, and Thrwill’s law as a measure of structural change, this study revealed that, the country has show a structural change in its economic progress. Indeed, the study also indicates that, within the period between 1990 and 2013 the country is notably not far from the world economy and it is in the process of catching up. The estimated coefficient of Kaldor- Verdroon for Ethiopian economy from 2005 to 2013 is greater than 0.5, therefore the country’s manufacturing sector is operating in the dynamic economies of scale and the country have a potential of catching up in the future.
Key words: Structural change, kaldor- verdroon coefficient, GTP, Thrwill’s law
References
André Nassif, Carmem Feijó and Eliane Araújo(2013). Structural Change And Economic Development: Is Brazil Catching Up Or Falling Behind?
Cimoli M, Porcile G and Rovira S (2010). Structural Change and BOP-Constraint: Why did Latin America Fail to Converge. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 389–411.
Hausmann R, Hwang J and Rodrik D (2007). What you Export Matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12 (1):1–25. International Monetary Fund (IMF, 2014).The Federal Democratic Republic Of Ethiopia Selected Issues Paper
Kaldor N (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. An inaugural lecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tadele F, Shiferaw K. (2015) Economic growth and employment patterns, dominant sector, and firm profiles in Ethiopia: Opportunities, challenges and Prospects
Thirlwall AP (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rates differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Vol. 128.
UNDP Ethiopia (2014) Ethiopia Quarterly Key Economic and Social Indicators produced by the Policy Advisory Unit
Verdoorn PJ (1949). Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttivitá del lavoro. L’Industria
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
