Does Community-based Forestry Management Approach Improve the Livelihoods of Local People? A case of Sal-forest area in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.41.2587Abstract
Community-based forest management (CBFM) approach has been implementing in the degraded Sal forest areas since 1989 with an aim to eliminate the main causes of forest depletion as well as alleviate poverty through participation of local people who depend on forest for their livelihoods in Bangladesh. The objective of the study was to explore the impact of CBFM initiative on the livelihoods of local people based on empirical data collected from the CBFM project sites. The study was conducted in two forest ranges of Sakhipur Sal forest area under Tangail district of Bangladesh. The findings indicate that though CFFM initiatives improved the financial capital of respondents to an extent, other livelihood capitals faced constraints and difficulties. Biasness of the CBFM project personnel and social discrimination, inequality issues and social capital differences were emerged between ethnic and non ethic respondents.. Lack of concrete commitment by the CBFM project personnel in particular and forest department in general, CBFM could not fulfill the demands of local people and limited success had been created to improve the overall livelihoods situation. It was reported during field observation that CBFM approach alone was not sufficient to manage and conserve the Sal forests or ensures local people’s basic needs and demands. Therefore, to address the diversified needs of forest dependent local people and to manage and conserve Sal forest in a more sustainable way, the forest department of Bangladesh might initiate a long-term-integrated approach with skilled local forest staff.
References
Alam, M., Y. Furukawa, S. K. Sarker & Ahmed, R. (2008). Sustainability of Sal (Shorea robusta) forest in Bangladesh: past, present and future actions. International Forestry Review 10: 29-37.
Allen, E. & Seaman, C. (2007). Likert scale and data analysis. Quality Progess, 40: 64-65.
Angelsen, A., Larsen, H. O. Lund, J. F. Smith-hall, C. & Wunder, S. (2011). Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence: methods for research and fieldwork. Edinburgh: London.
Bandyopadhyar, S.& Shyamsundar, P. (2004). Fuelwood consumption and participation in community forestry in India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3331. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
BFD, (2016). Bangladesh Forest Department, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Available at http://www.bforest.gov.bd [last accessed on 19 September 2016].
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. Davis, I. &.Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. New York, Routledge.
Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K. & Ellis, E. (2011). Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+, Environmental Science and Policy, 14: 152-167.
Carney, D. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods; what contribution can we make? London: Department of International Development.
Das, N. (2009). Can joint forest management programme sustain rural life: a livelihood analysis from community-based forest management groups> MPRA paper no 15305. Available at http://www.mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15305 [accessed 20 October 2016].
Dersham, L. & Gzirishvili, D. (1998). Informal social support networks and household vulnerability: empirical findings from Georgia. World Development 26: 1827-1838.
DFID, (2001). Sustainable livelihood Guidance Sheets: comparing development approaches. Department for International Development, London, UK.
Evans, K. & Gaurigauta M. R. (2008). Participatory monitoring in tropical forest management: a review of tools, concepts and lessons learned, Bagor, Indonesia: Center ofr International Forestry Research.
FAO, (2015). Global Forest Resource Assessment 2015. Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Gain, P. (2002). The last forest of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Society for Environmental and Human Development.
Horwich, R. H. & Lyon, J. (2007). Community conservation: practitioners' answer to critics. Oryx, 41(3):376-385.
Hussein, K. & Nelson, J. (1998). Sustainable livelihood and livelihood diversification. IDS Working Paper No. 69. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Islam, K. K. & Sato, N. (2012). Participatory forestry in Bangladesh: has it helped to increase the livelihoods of Sal forests-dependent people? Sothern Forests, 74 (2): 89-101.
Moser, C. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26: 1-19.
Muhammad, N., Koike, M. Sajjaduzzaman, M. & Sophanarith, K. (2005). Reckoning Socila Forestry In Bangladesh: Policy and Plan verus implementation, Forestry, 78: 373-383.
Safa, M. S. (2004). The effect of participatory forest management on the livelihood of the settlers in a rehabilitation program of degraded forest in Bangladesh. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3: 223-238.
Sharma, B. P. (2006). Poverty alleviation through forest resource management: an analysis of leasehold forestry practice in Nepal. Available at http://www.sandeeonline.com/uploads/general_docs/research_guidelines/bishnusharma.pdf [accessed 25 October 2016].
Soussan, J., Blaikie, P., Springate-Baginski, O. & Chadwick, M. (2001). Understanding Livelihood Processes and Dynamics. Livelihood-Policy Relationship in South Asia Working Paper 1, University of Leeds, UK.
Tyler, S. D. (2006). Community based natural resource management: a research approach to rural poverty and environmental degradation. International Development Research Centre. Available at http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-103630-201-2-DO_TOPIC.html [accessed 30 October 2016].
Warner, K. (2003). Moving forward: development pathways for sustainable livelihoods through forestry. In: Iddi, S., Sarrazin, K., Reeb, D. (eds), Defining the way forward: sustainable livelihoods and sustainable forest management through participatory forestry. Second International Workshop on participatory forestry in Africa, 18-22 February 2002, Arusha, United Republic of Tanzania. Rome: FAO pp 23-30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
