Cross Cultural Translation and Translatability of Poetry

Rehana Yasmin Anjum

doi:10.14738/assrj.35.1909

Authors

Rehana Yasmin Anjum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.35.1909

Abstract

Translation is as old as human history. We can get access to the culture as well as literature of other nations through the channel. Translation is a very creative skill, but its modes differ according to the purposes it has to serve. Translating literature of any other language makes heavy demands on the translator. Literary translation is one of the types of translation. Translation of poetry has been a chimera for the translators since ages. Due to its unique structure and appeal, translatability of poetry has been a hot issue of translation studies. This issue becomes even severe when a ST and TT are from different socio-cultural backgrounds. Poetry is highly creative genre where poet’s personal lexicon plays an important role. Translating poetic diction and personal lexicon of the poets across cultures is a herculean task. This paper aims at analyzing the problems in dealing with this task, especially in symbolic poetry. The purpose of the study is to analyze the quality of translation by various translators on the basis of the degree of translatability, that how far these translations are accurate in depicting the poet‘s message more effectively on lexical and thematic levels.Poly system theory of Evan Zohar and Toury has provided the theoretical background. The study has three independent variables; translations by different translators (having different Socio-cultural background).Lexical and syntactic choices and Treatment of allusions. (Pragmatic awareness about the poet and the poem).There is one dependent variable; Truthful Translation nearer to the original thought. Translation Quality Assessment (TQA) Model that applies socio-semiotic approach developed by Julianne House (1976) is used. It is found that not all types of poetry are difficult to translate, but some highly symbolic or subjective types are difficult only in the absence of proper socio-pragmatic knowledge. It will also help further researchers to analyze the problems faced in order to maintain the standard of equivalence, reliability, and entertainment in translated work that is drawn out of a great piece of original art.

References

Agha,S. A.(1995). A Rebel’s Silhouette. Published.Agha Shahid Ali was published.

Basnett, S, and Andre Lefevere , Iyengar, Krishna Srinivas. (1988). “On Translating Poetry,” Creative Forum Spivak, G.C. 1993. “The Politics of Translation,” Outside the Teaching Machine. New York: Rutledge, Larson, Mildred L. 1984. Meaning- based Translation: A Guide to Cross-Language Equivalence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Bassnett,S.(1980) Translation Studies. 1980. Revised edition 1991. London: Rutledge.

Bassnett, S(1980).Translation Studies. Revised edition 1991. London: Rutledge.

Catford, J. C. (2000) “Translation Shifts”. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti. London: Rutledge, 141 – 148.Gasset, Jose Ortega y. 2000 “The Misery and Splendor of

Translation”. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti. London: Rutledge,

Ediciones del Bronce. (1998): Daisy Miller. Trans. A. Algarra. Madrid: Unidad Editorial.

Hashmi.S.A.H.(1986)Problems and Prniciples of English Language Teaching in Pakistan,Hashmi Art Press.Karachi House, J. (1997). Translation quality assessment: A model revisited. Gunter Narr Verlag: Tübingen.

House, J. (1977). A model for translation quality assessment. Meta, 22, 103-109

House, J. (2001). Translation quality assessment: linguistic description versus social evaluation. Meta, 46, 243-257Venuti, Lawrence. Ed. The Translation Studies Reader. London: Rutledge,

House, J. (2001). Translation quality assessment: linguistic description versus social evaluation. Meta, 46, 243-257

Hatim, B. and Mason, I. (1991): Discourse and the translator, London: Longman.

James, H. (1986): Daisy Miller. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.— (1997): Daisy Miller. Trans. X.Aleixandre and R. Guardiet. Barcelona

Kiernan, V.G.(1971). Poems by Faiz. published

Kwofie, E. (1999): “On the relationship of translator to linguistics and stylistics” in Eureka, vol.13, June, pp.40-50.

Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation History Culture: A Sourcebook.. London: Rutledge.

Lawal, B. et al. (1996): “A pragmatic study of selected pairs of Yoruba proverbs” in Journal of Pragmatics, pp.635-652. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.34.1909. 14

Lederer, M. (1986): “Implicite et explicite” in Selescovitch and Lederer: Interpreter pour traduire, Paris: Didier Erudition.

Lawrence, V. (2000). The Translation Studies Reader.London: Rutledge.

Newmark, P. (1981): Approaches to Translation, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Nida, E.( 2000) .“Principles of Correspondence”. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed.

Lazard, N.(1987). The True Subject-Selected poems of Faiz Ahmad Faiz.Published.

Vinay, Jean Paul and Jean Darbelnet.(2004) “A Methodology for Translation”. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti. London: Rutledge,

Nida, E.(1961): Towards a Science of Translating, Leiden E.J. Brill.

Nida, E. et Taber, Ch.(1971) : La Traduction : Theorie et methode, Londres : Alliance Biblique Universelle.

Hashmi,A. (1990). From Inkar (Refusal) by Parveen Shakir: Murad Publications. Islamabad. © Urdu text by Parveen Shakir © English translation by | | |

Pena, S. (1997): “El traductor en su jaula: Hacia una pauta deanálisis de traducciones”. In R. Álvarez and A. Vidal, eds., Translation,Power, Subversion. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters: 19-57.

Perez Gonzalez, Luis and Antonia Sanchez Macarro (2000):: “Pragmalinguistic issues in the translation of sensitive literary texts”. In P. Navarro, R. Lores, S. Murillo and C. Buesa, eds., TransculturalCommunication. Zaragoza: Anubar Ediciones, 13-21.

Searle, J.L. (1969): Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Rehman,S.(2002). 100 poems by Faiz Ahmad Faiz 1911-84. published

Reiss, K(2000). “Type, Kind and Individuality of Text: Decision making in Translation” .The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti. London: Rutledge,

Rodrigues, S, V. (1996). Translation quality: A Housian analysis. Meta, 41, 223-227

Setiajid, H, H (2006). Socio-semiotic approach in translation: Two Models Revisited. Retrieved from: www.usd.ac.id/06/publ_dosen/phenomena/Feb06/Harris.pdf

Schleiermacher, F. (1985) : Des Differentes methodes du traduire, Paris : Edition du Seuil ; translated by A. Berman and C. Berner.

Skinner, B.F. (1974) : About Behaviourism, London : Cape.

Vazquez, Ignacio (1995): A Contrastive Study of Politeness Phenomenain England and Spain. Duisburg: L.A.U.D.

Williams, M (2001). The application of argumentation theory to translation quality assessment. Meta, 46,326-343

Vermeer, H(2000). “Skopos and Commission in Translational Action”In. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti. London: Rutledge,: 213 – 221.

Yule, G. (1996): Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

http://www.viewpointonline.net/messiah-of-crystals-on-translating-faiz.html

http://www.urdustudies.com/pdf/15/07pritchett.pdf

http://21stcenturysocialism.com/article/dont_ask_me_for_that_love_again_01355.html

http://www.egothemag.com/urdupoetry/archives/2005/10/post.html

http://www.dawn.com/2011/02/13/translating-faiz.html

http://threedrinksahead.wordpress.com/2005/05/20/kuchh-ishq-kiya-kuchh-kaam-kiyasome-lovesome-work-by-faiz-ahmed-faiz/

http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=9TAzp1Vy7t0C&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=most+translated+poem +in+English+of+Faiz+ahmed+Faiz&source=bl&ots=O33oAtcGdr&sig=eEtZlYtIwxArmabDcCgqXOgrjyQ&h Anjum, R. Y. (2016). Cross Cultural Translation and Translatability of Poetry. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(5) 01-16. l=en&sa=X&ei=arn0TuLSLdTS4QShlMmNCA&ved=0CE4Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=most%20translated% 20poem%20in%20English%20of%20Faiz%20ahmed%20Faiz&f=false

http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/amit/books/faiz-1988-true-subject-selected.html

http://translationjournal.net/journal/41culture.htm

http://www.translatum.gr/journal/5/translatability-and-poetic-translation.htm

http://www.wikipedia.parveen shakir.htm