A Conceptual Framework for Multi-Tier Supply Chain Network Architecture and Resilience

Authors

  • Michael C. Chiya School of Business Studies, Department of Economics, ZCAS University, Zambia
  • Francis Mukosa School of Business Studies, Department of Economics, ZCAS University, Zambia
  • Geoffrey Mweshi School of Business Studies, Department of Economics, ZCAS University, Zambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1306.11871

Keywords:

Supply Chain Resilience, Network Topology, Digital Twin Technology, Disruption Spread, Multi-Tier Transparency, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Introduction: SCN have become very strategic and intricate structures in contemporary operations management; they function both as a vector for vulnerabilities and an essential force driving competitive advantage. Being multi-tiered systems composed of nodes and links that stretch across nations and institutions' jurisdictions, such networks contain profound vulnerabilities that pose significant challenges to firm-level resilience paradigms. Objective: This paper aims at conducting an SLR of existing scientific studies that analyze the structural properties of SCNs, outline the structural mechanisms of multi-tier disruption propagation within these networks, and assess how digital technologies can be used to increase their resilience. Methodology: Employing SLR methodology in its entirety, the present study analyzes peer-reviewed papers dedicated to this problem from 2020 to 2026. Conceptual integration will be conducted using Network Theory, SCRES Theory, and Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Results: It has been found that the main structure-based predictor of disruption cascade effects in SCNs is network topology defined by such metrics as node degree distribution, geographic clustering, and multi-tier visibility depth. Importantly, it has been demonstrated that the use of digital twins, decentralized nodes, and E2E visibility contributes significantly to enhanced disruption absorption and time-to-recovery (TTR). Originality/Value: This work adds value to the field of operations management research through the formulation of a conceptual model for Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Network Resilience, which is a synthesis of the relationship between structural network topology and digital technology adoption. The final section of the paper applies these learnings to provide six practical recommendations for building resilient supply chains in the face of macroeconomic disruptions.

References

Alikhani, R., Torabi, S. A., & Altay, N. (2021). Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, Article 108042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108042

Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Fosso Wamba, S., & Queiroz, M. M. (2021). Building supply-chain resilience: An artificial intelligence-based technique and decision-making framework. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4487–4507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1950935

Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2021). Artificial intelligencedriven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: An empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333, 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x

Chen, L., Risk, I., & Mitigation, C. (2026). The impact of supply chain risk management on organizational resilience: The mediating role of resource reconfiguration. Preprints in Supply Chain Management, Article 202602.0220.

Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. A. (2021). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualisation and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, Article 107886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107886

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications.

Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Wieland, A. (2017). A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(4), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145

Fosso, W., Queiroz, M. M., & Trinchera, L. (2020). Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, Article 107791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107791

Hosseini, S., & Ivanov, D. (2022). A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: A Bayesian network approach. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 581–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03350-8 Page | 137 Scholar Publishing

Ivanov, D. (2020). Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives. Annals of Operations Research, 299, 1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03414-7

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450

Li, J. (2026). The mechanism and impact of digital transformation on supply chain resilience in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Systems & Technology, 16(1), 11–24.

Li, K. (2026). Dynamic capabilities, sustainable supply chain management practices, and resilience: Evidence from multi-tier network structures. Sustainability & Supply Networks, 18(5), 2258.

Odamtten, M. (2025). From resilience to rivalry: How disruption strategies mediate supply chain stability's impact on manufacturing firms' competitive advantage. Journal of International Research and Reviews, 12(3), 1637.

Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., Moktadir, M. A., & Lau, K. H. (2021). Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 136, 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.056

Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873

Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2020). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: Mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1159–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2021). Supply chain management for extreme conditions: Research opportunities. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12255

Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Journal, 41(12), 2145–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3116

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 Page | 138

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Chiya, M. C., Mukosa, F., & Mweshi, G. (2026). A Conceptual Framework for Multi-Tier Supply Chain Network Architecture and Resilience. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 13(06), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1306.11871