The Development of Commercial Law: Perspectives from Chinese and European Traditions

Authors

  • Wang Zhengyao Ph.D student at Graduate school, Ikh Zasag International University, Mongolia
  • Lkhundev Narantuya (Ph.D), Doctor, Associate Professor. Director of Graduate School, Ikh Zasag International University, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1301.19843

Keywords:

China and Europe, Commercial Law, Commercial Legislation

Abstract

Our article argues that future reform of China’s commercial law should preserve its indigenous legal characteristics while selectively integrating advanced elements of foreign commercial law to enhance systemic coherence, adaptability, and market responsiveness. Commercial law, as a core branch of private law governing commercial transactions and market activities, has been shaped by diverse historical, cultural, and institutional traditions. Through a comparative analysis of the historical evolution of commercial law in Europe and China, the study highlights the distinct legal trajectories formed under Europe’s maritime civilization and decentralized city-state autonomy, and China’s agrarian civilization and centralized state structure. From the perspectives of legal culture and legal tradition, the article examines differences in conceptual foundations, normative structures, and regulatory principles between the two systems. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of European commercial law derives from its strong emphasis on the autonomy, efficiency, and specificity of commercial activities, whereas Chinese commercial law has historically been embedded within public-law-oriented governance and moral regulation. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a balanced reform approach that combines institutional continuity with selective legal innovation.

References

Berman, H. J. (1983). Law and revolution: The formation of the Western legal tradition. Harvard University Press.

Berman, H. J. (2003). Law and revolution II: The impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western legal tradition. Harvard University Press.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Gordon, R. W., & Horwitz, M. J. (2008). Introduction: Law, society, and history. In R. W. Gordon & M. J. Horwitz (Eds.), Law, society, and history: Themes in the legal sociology and legal history of Lawrence M. Friedman (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

Hammurabi. (c. 1754 BCE/1997). The Code of Hammurabi (L. W. King, Trans.). Dover Publications. Scholar Publishing

Kötz, H., & Zweigert, K. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge

Pistor, K. (2019). The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton

Rhodian Sea Law. (n.d.). In Digest of Justinian (Book 14). Roman law sources.

Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (S. Kalberg, Trans.). Roxbury Publishing. (Original work published 1905)

Zimmermann, R. (1996). The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford University Press.

Zhang Shiwei (2019), On the Independence of Commercial Law—Focusing on CommercialSubjects (Merchants), Commercial Law Forum, 2019, No. 4

Chen Zhiwu (2021), A Historical Comparison of Different Civilizations fromthe Maritime Silk Road: Implications for Contemporary Enterprises [J]. Foreign Economics and Management, 2021, 43(6): 3-26. 8. Nie Weifeng (2013), Codification and the Latest Developments of the French CommercialCode, Journal of National Prosecutors College, 21(2).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-13

How to Cite

Zhengyao, W., & Narantuya, L. (2026). The Development of Commercial Law: Perspectives from Chinese and European Traditions. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 13(01), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1301.19843