Rethinking New Social Movements from a Relational Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1304.20148Keywords:
New social movements, relational sociology, Actor-Network Theory, seriality, cruel optimism, Network Intensification ModelAbstract
This article aims to reconceptualize new social movements from a relational sociological perspective, replacing outdated typological classifications and identity-centered paradigms. Recent studies on new social movements find the focus on traditional collective identity, organization, and cultural factors insufficient, instead centering on distributed network-based and emotional characteristics. In this context, drawing particularly on the work of relational sociologists like Harrison White, and building upon Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory, Iris Marion Young's concept of seriality, and Lauren Berlant's curiel optimism, the article aims to develop a relational sociological Network Intensification Model to analyze current new social movements. The proposed model represents a significant innovation contributing to the existing literature by conceptualizing social movements not as stable collective actors, but as temporary network intensifications arising from serial positioning and sustained by emotional ties. This model highlights the role of not only humans but also non-humans, algorithms, platforms, images, and material objects in the emergence of social movements. Instead of focusing on fixed categories such as “environmental” or “feminist” movements, the model emphasizes degrees of network density, synchronization thresholds, emotional circulation, and algorithmic visibility. Drawing on relational sociological principles and focusing on process analysis rather than typological classifications, the article attempts to contribute to the dynamic and non-anthropocentric ontology of collective action. In this context, the article presents contemporary social movements as cyclical formations that intensify, dissolve, and potentially re-emerge through relational structures. This theoretical work also gains value by offering new methodological and theoretical avenues for examining digitally mediated and emotionally structured forms of movement.
References
Babkin, A., Tashenova, L., Mamrayeva, D., Shkarupeta, Y., Karimov, D., Shkarupeta, Y Karimov, D.( 2022) "Digital platforms for network innovation-intensive industrial clusters: Essence and characteristics," International Journal of Technology. Publis Volume : IJtech Vol 13, No 7 (DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i7.5538)
Berlant,L. (2011) Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge.
Çevik,N.K. (2021) The Millennial Generational Style: New Global Political and Economic Orientations Journal of Economy Culture and Society 65: 29-46 ( DOI: 10.26650/JECS2021-978819)
Kasapoglu, A. (2016) Uygulamalı İlişkisel Sosyoloji. Yeni Insan.
Kashima,Y., Shata,S., Khandis,B. (2025) Cultural Logics and individualism-collectivism:a conceptualization of the two frameworks from a cultural dynamical perspective.Current Reserch in Ecological and Social Psychology.9 (2) .(https://doi.org/10.106/j.cresp.2025.100232 )
Kahn,J., Kalai,G.(2007) Threshold and Expectation Thresholds.Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press.
Liu ,Y., Zhang, Y., Xiaoging,X., Shengjun,M. (2024) "Affording digital transformation: The role of industrial Internet platform in traditional manufacturing enterprises digital transformation," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 7. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28772)
Marx, K.,Engels, F. (1978). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 469–500). W. W. Norton.
Melucci, A. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 19(2), 199–226.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Vintage.
Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52(4), 817–868.
Paternotte, D. (2014). LGBTQ activism and social change. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(3), 265–282.
Soler-i Marti, R., Fernandez-Planells, A., & Perez-Altable, L. (2024). Youth climate movements and temporal urgency. Environmental Politics, 33(3), 517–536.
Stets, J.E.,Turner,J.H.(2014) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions.Vol.II. Springer.
Touraine, A. (1981). The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge University
Touraine, A. (1992). Critique of Modernity. Blackwell.
Turner,V.W. (1974)Dramas, Fields and Metaphors,Symbolic Action in Human Society.Cornel University Press.
Turner,V.W.(1988) Anthropology of Performance.PAJ.
White,H.C(1992) Identity and Control: A structural Theory of Social Action.Princeteon University Page | 215
Scholar Publishing White,H.C., Godart,F.C., Corona,V.P. (2007) Mobilizing Identities:Uncertaint and Control Strategy, Theory Culture and Society,24:181-202.
White,H.C.(2008) Identity and Control:How Social Formations Emerges. Princeton University Press.
Young,M.I. (1994/2009) Gender as a seriality:Thinking about women as a social collective. Signs. 19(3): 713-738.
Young,M.I. (2011) Responsibilities for Justice. Oxford University Pres
Young,M.I. (2006) The logic of masculinist protection : Reflection on the Current Security State. Signs,Vol.29 (1): 1-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mehmet Sökmen, Aytul Kasapoglu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
