The Compliance-Improvement Paradox: Quality Assurance Mechanisms and Service Delivery Effectiveness in Resource-Constrained Higher Education Contexts

Authors

  • Kassim Bawah Abdallah Registry, School of Medicine, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
  • Rose Achoanya Ayam Registry, School of Medicine, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
  • Shirley Ayisha Nahyi Registry, School of Medicine, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1303.19881

Keywords:

Quality assurance, service delivery, higher education, developing countries, Ghana

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of quality assurance mechanisms (QAMs) in enhancing service delivery at the University for Development Studies (UDS), with particular attention to the tension between compliance-oriented and improvement-oriented approaches to quality enhancement. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, combining quantitative surveys with semi-structured interviews conducted with students, faculty, administrative staff, university administrators, and community members as participants. Data were analysed using regressions and thematic analyses. The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between QAMs and service delivery effectiveness (SDE). Qualitative findings, however, uncovered a compliance-improvement paradox, as most respondents characterized the institutional quality assurance (QA) culture as reactive rather than improvement-oriented. The most significant barriers to implementation included resource constraints, bureaucratic delays, paper-based systems, and cultural resistance. Internal assessments were perceived as more effective than external evaluations, although both mechanisms suffered from weak stakeholder feedback integration. This study advances QA theory by demonstrating empirically that structurally robust QAMs can produce suboptimal outcomes when implementation is constrained by resource limitations and compliance-focused institutional cultures. This study extends Total Quality Management (TQM) theory to resource-constrained contexts by identifying contextual moderators that attenuate the QA-performance relationship. Higher education institutions in developing countries should transition from compliance-driven to improvement-oriented QA cultures, invest in digital QA infrastructure, and strengthen stakeholder engagement mechanisms to realise the full potential of their QA systems. This study provides the first comprehensive empirical examination of the compliance-improvement paradox in African higher education, offering evidence-based insights for QA policy and practice in resource-constrained institutional contexts.

References

Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A. and Fisscher, O.A. (2013), “An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 56, pp. 7-17.

Becket, N. and Brookes, M. (2008), “Quality management practice in higher education: What quality are we actually enhancing?”, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education,

Boateng, F. K., Anyidoho, E. D., & Intsiful, E. (2023). Exploring the internal quality assurance management practices at the University of Ghana. Journal of Educational Management, 13(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.47963/jem.v13i.1174

Page | 101 Scholar Publishing Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101.

Brennan, J. and Shah, T. (2000), Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change, Open University Press, Buckingham.

Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2018), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed., SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Deming, W.E. (1986), Out of the Crisis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Elassy, N. (2015), “The concepts of quality, QAand quality enhancement”, Quality Assurance in Ghana Tertiary Education Commission. (n.d.). Quality assurance. GTEC. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://gtec.edu.gh/quality-assurance

Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993), “Defining quality”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher

Harvey, L. and Williams, J. (2010), “Fifteen years of quality in higher education”, Quality in Higher

Luckett, K. (2006), “The Quality Assurance of teaching and learning in higher education in South Africa: An analysis of national policy development and stakeholder response”, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Stellenbosch.

Materu, P. (2007), Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Promising Practices, World Bank Working Paper No. 124, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Morley, L. (2003), Quality and Power in Higher Education, Open University Press, Maidenhead.

Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P. and Johnson, D.M. (2009), “Service quality in higher education”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 139-152.

Sahney, S., Banwet, D.K. and Karunes, S. (2004), “Conceptualizing total quality management in higher education”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 145-159.

Shah, M. and Nair, S. (2012), “The changing nature of teaching and unit evaluations in Australian universities”, QAin Education, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 274-288.

Srikanthan, G. and Dalrymple, J. (2003), “Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 126-136.

Stensaker, B. (2011), “Accreditation of higher education in Europe: Moving towards the US model?”, Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 757-769.

Stensaker, B. and Harvey, L. (Eds.) (2011), Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, Routledge, New York.

Tamrat, W., & Teferra, D. (2021). Advancing transnational higher education in Ethiopia: Policy promises and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211042088

Teferra, D. and Altbach, P.G. (2004), “African higher education: Challenges for the 21st century”, Higher Education, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 21-50.

Venkatraman, S. (2007), “A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 92-112.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Abdallah, K. B., Ayam, R. A., & Nahyi, S. A. (2026). The Compliance-Improvement Paradox: Quality Assurance Mechanisms and Service Delivery Effectiveness in Resource-Constrained Higher Education Contexts. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 13(03), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1303.19881