Perspectives on Mental Wellness in Child and Youth Care Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.65.6606Abstract
This course-based research project is conducted in a qualitative interpretive paradigm. The purpose of the inquiry is to gain insight into how students interpret their own subjective experiences and understanding of the impact that the undergraduate child and youth care program at MacEwan University has had on their mental wellness. A purposive sample of four child and youth care students was selected. Data was collected through the use of a semi-structured focus group and a reflective arts-based activity. The data was analysed using Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis which resulted in the identification of six themes. These include: a) safe and supportive learning environment, b) enhanced understanding, c) genuine student-professor relationship, d) seeing mental health as a strength, e) the healing power of creativity and play, and f) transformational nature of child and youth care education.
References
Allen, J. P., & Manning, N. (Eds.). (2007). From safety to affect regulation: Attachment from the vantage point of adolescence. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development,117, 23–39.
Bellefeuille, G., Ekdahl, C., Kent, L., & Kluczny, M. (2014). A course-based creative inquiry approach to teaching introductory research methods in Child and Youth Care undergraduate education. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(2), 1–9.
Bellefeuille, G., & Jamieson, D. (2008). Relational-centred planning: A turn toward creative potential and possibilities. In G. Bellefeuille & F. Ricks, (Eds.) Standing on the precipice: Inquiry into the creative potential of Child and Youth Care Practice (pp. 35–72). Edmonton, AB: MacEwan Press.
Bellefeuille, G., & Ricks, F. (2010). Relational inquiry: A child and youth care approach to research. Children and Youth Services, 32, 1235–1241.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eckroth-Bucher, M. (2010) Self-awareness: A review and analysis of a basic nursing concept. Advances in Nursing Science, 33(4), 297–309.
Fewster, G. (1990). Being in child care: A journey into self. New York, NY: Haworth.
Garfat, T. (2008). The inter-personal in-between: An exploration of relational child and youth care practice. In G. Bellefeuille & F. Ricks (Eds.), Standing on the precipice: Inquiry into the creative potential of child and youth care practice (pp 7–34). Edmonton, AB: MacEwan Press.
Hannula, M., Suoranta, J., & Vandén, T. (2005). Artistic research: Theory, method and practices. Helsinki, FI: Academy of Fine Arts.
Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2011). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: Changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 279–286.
Krueger, M. (2000). Central themes in child and youth care practice. CYC-OnLine, 12(January). Retrieve from http://www.cyc-net.org/ cyc-online/cycol-0100-krueger.html
Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Maier, H. W. (1979). The core of care: Essential ingredients for the development of children at home and away from home. Child Care Quarterly, 8(3), 161–173.
McNiff, S. (2007). Arts-based research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 29–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: AltaMira Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ricks, F. (1989). Self-awareness model for training and application in child and youth care. Journal of Child and Youth Care, 4(1), 33–41.
Ricks, F. (2001). Without the self there is no other. CYC Online, 27. Retrieved from: http://www.cyc-net.org/cyconline/cycol-0401-ricks.html
Ricks, F. (2003). Relatedness in relationships: It’s about being. Relational Child & Youth Care Practice, 16(3), 70–77.
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–214). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
