Manifestations Of School-Level Mediation Factors During Syllabus Implementation: A Case Of Localised Advanced Level Geography Syllabus

Authors

  • Wonderful Dzimiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.51.4097

Abstract

This article investigated manifestation of school-level factors mediating the implementation of the Zimbabwe localised Advanced level Geography syllabus introduced in 2002. Employing a concurrent triangulated strategy, the population entailed 19 high schools offering Advanced level Geography in the Gweru district comprising rural, high density, low density and mission high schools, 287 Advanced level Geography students, 103 former students, and 21 Geography teachers. Stratified random sampling of 12 (63%) schools ensured inclusion of school categories typical of Gweru high schools. 287 (88%) current students and 52 (50%) former students were selected as sample participants using stratified random sampling technique. 12 teachers were selected purposively. Questionnaires, lesson observations and structured interview techniques concurrently employed generated data for the study. Data were analysed using frequencies (numbers), and in some instances, with corresponding percentages. Major findings were that teachers did not cover all syllabus topics. Most teachers did not have detailed lesson plans and largely used the scheme-cum plan. Objectives were clearly stated and linked to syllabus goals. Lesson deliveries were teacher-centred and employed traditional as opposed to interactive, child-centred methods. Textbooks available were inadequate, outdated and of little relevance to the new syllabus. Mission and low density urban schools were better resources compared to rural and high density urban schools. The study recommends that, over and above staff-developing teachers on all syllabus topics, schools should provide relevant material resources and technology that enhance interactive methods where students can actively participate and gain ownership of their learning.

References

Alonsabe, O. C. (2005). CurriculumI Implementation and Enrichment. Module 2. Innotech SEMAO.

Bredekamp, S. (1995). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Serving children from birth through Age 8. Washington: NAYC Connecticut.

Chavhunduka, K. & Moyo, C. (2003). Practicality of Exemplary Curriculum Implementation Material. The Case of Chemistry Module in Science Education In-service Teacher Training. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 15(12), 99-11.

Chiromo, A. S. (2010). Challenges of Science and Learning in Rural Day Secondary Schools in Zimbabwe. UNISWA Research Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 13 (1) 5-13.

Cochran,-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. L. (2001). Theory and the Practice of Education. London: Henemann.

Cohen, L., Manion L., & Morrison, K, (2011). Research Methods in Education. (7 Ed.). London: Routledge. nd

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods research. (2 Ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. nd

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. (2 Ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. nd

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2 Ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. rd

Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (3 Ed.). New York: Teachers’ College Press, Columbia University.

Gatawa, B. S. M. (1990). The Politics of the School Curriculum: An Introduction. Harare: College Press.

Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2008). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. (7 Ed.). London: Harper Collins Publisher Limited.

Kroma, S. (1996). Popularising Science Education in Developing Countries through Indigenous Knowledge. http://www. A; /IK Monitor 3 (3) Kroma. Htm. Accesed 20 February, 2012. nd

Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology- A step- by- step guide for beginners. (2 Ed.). London: Sage Publications

Mampuru, K. (2001). Educational Management vs. Human Resource Management. Pretoria: Technikon Pretoria.

Ministry of Education, Sport Arts and Culture, (2000). Secretary’s Circular Minute B15 of 2000. Curriculum Review. 2/2/200.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Akker, J., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N. and Plomp, T., (Eds.). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordredit: Kluiver Academic Publishers.

Nziramasanga, C.T. (1999). Report of the Presidential Commission on Education and Training. Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ornstein,, A.C. and Hunkins, F. (2009). Curriculum Foundations, Principles and Theories. (5 ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Sheridon, M. D. (1990). Child’s Developmental Progress from Birth to Five Years. New York: NFER Publishing Company.

Stuart, J. S. (1995). Case Studies: Teaching in Lesotho Classrooms-Classroom Action Report. Maseru.

Urebvu, A. (1999). Curriculum Studies. Lagos: Longman.

Winter, S. S. (1998). Science Education at Elementary and Secondary Level in Asia. Essex: Longman.

Wolcott, H. F. (2001). The Art of Fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Zvobgo, R. J. (1999). State, Ideology and Education. Gweru: Mambo Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-26

How to Cite

Dzimiri, W. (2018). Manifestations Of School-Level Mediation Factors During Syllabus Implementation: A Case Of Localised Advanced Level Geography Syllabus. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.51.4097