Factor structures across countries and across clusters of countries: A 36-country study on the Family Values Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.38.2157Keywords:
Hit matrix, MDS-T, Hierarchical Roles of father and mother, Relationships with Kin, Family Values Scale (FVS)Abstract
Values in the family have been studied within countries and across-countries with respect to their change, transmission, with relation to familial-individual aspects (family roles, psychological bonds, etc.) and with respect to numerous other psychological correlates. To study values across cultures, factor equivalence is of essence. We employed an alternative methodological and statistical factor equivalence approach across our national samples derived from the Georgas et al. dataset on Family related variables (N=7,766 university students). Apart from the individual country level comparison, a country-clustering method was also applied. For these clusters of countries it was shown through covariance structure analysis that the levels of factor equivalence for the respective factor structure were better and the structure was much clearer as compared to the respective solution with countries treated under the same factor estimation methods but as separate units (not clustered). Conclusions are drawn on family values' support and country/cluster characteristics and on the structural homogeneity of cultures within each cluster.
References
Byrne, B.M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. Psichothema, 20(4), 872-882.
Byrne, B.M., & van de Vijver F.J.R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107-132.
Gari, A., Mylonas, K., & Panagiotopoulou, P. (2009). Dimensions of Social Axioms and Alternative Country-Clustering Methods. In: A. Gari and K. Mylonas (eds.), Quod Erat Demonstrandum: From Herodotus' Ethnographic Journeys to Cross-Cultural Research. Athens: Pedio Books Publishing, pp. 231-243.
Gari, A., Panagiotopoulou, P., & Mylonas, K. (2009). Social axioms in Greece: Etic and emic dimensions and their relationships with locus of control. In: K. Leung and M.H. Bond (eds.), Psychological Aspects of Social Axioms. Understanding global belief systems. New York: Springer Science, pp. 197-216.
Georgas, J. (1993). An ecological-social model for indigenous psychology: The example of Greece. In: U. Kim and J.W. Berry, (eds), Indigenous psychologies: Theory, method and experience in cultural context. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 56-78.
Georgas, J. (1999). Family as a context variable in cross-cultural psychology. In: J. Adamopoulos and Y. Kashima (eds.), Social psychology and cultural context. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 163-175.
Georgas, J. (2012). 'Multivariate analyses of families across cultures'. Symposium at the 21st Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Stellenbosch, South Africa, July 17-21.
Georgas, J., & Berry, J.W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 121-157.
Georgas, J., & Mylonas, K. (2006). Cultures are like all other cultures, like some other cultures, like no other culture. In: U. Kim, K.S. Yang, and K.K. Hwang (eds.), Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context. New York: Springer, pp. 197-221.
Georgas, J., van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Berry, J.W. (2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indicators and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74-96.
Kashima, Y. (2012). 'Cultural Dynamics'. Keynote Speech presented at the 21st Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Stellenbosch, South Africa, July 17-21.
Kim, U., Park, Y-S., & Park, D. (2000). The challenge of Cross-Cultural Psychology: The role of Indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 5-13.
Marcoulides, G.A., & Drezner, Z. (2000). A procedure for detecting pattern clustering in measurement designs. In: M. Wilson, K. Draney, and G. Engelhard Jr. (eds.), Objective Measurement: Theory into practice, vol. 5. NJ: Ablex, pp. 287-302.
Marcoulides, G.A. & Moustaki, I. (eds.) (2012). Latent Variable and Latent Structure Models. NY: Routledge.
Mylonas, K. (2009a). Statistical analysis techniques based on Cross-Cultural research methods: cross-cultural paradigms and intra-country comparisons. "Psychology": The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 16(2), 185-204.
Mylonas, K. (2009b). Reducing Bias in Cross-Cultural Factor Analysis through a Statistical Technique for Metric Adjustment: Factor Solutions for Quintets and Quartets of Countries. In: A. Gari and K. Mylonas (eds.), Quod Erat Demonstrandum: From Herodotus' Ethnographic Journeys to Cross-Cultural Research. Athens: Pedio Books Publishing, pp. 159-168.
Mylonas, K. & Furnham, A. (2014). Bias in Terms of Culture and a Method for Reducing It: An Eight-Country "Explanations of Unemployment Scale" Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 77-96. doi: 10.1177/0013164413502669
Mylonas, K., Lawrence, C., Zajenkowska, A., & Bower Russa, M. (2017). The Situational Triggers of Aggressive Responses scale in five countries: factor structure and country clustering solutions. Personality and Individual Differences, 107(1), 172-179. Online first, August 2016, doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.030
Papazoglou, S. & Mylonas, K. (2016). An examination of alternative Multidimensional scaling techniques. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Online first, August 2016, doi: dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164416661823
Poortinga, Y.H. (1989). Equivalence of Cross-Cultural data: an overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737-756.
Poortinga, Y.H., & van de Vijver F.J.R. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259-282.
Segall, M.H., Dasen, P.W., Berry, J.W., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to Cross-Cultural Psychology. Pergamon General Psychology Series. Pergamon Press.
Valencia, R.R., Rankin, R.J., & Livingston, R. (1995). K-ABC content bias: Comparisons between Mexican American and White children. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 153-169.
van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2011). Capturing bias in structural equation modeling. In: E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, and J. Billiet (eds.) Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications. New York: Routledge, (pp. 3-34).
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analyses for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y.H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141-156.
van Hemert, D.A., Baerveldt, C., & Vermande, M. (2001). Assessing Cross-Cultural item bias in questionnaires: acculturation and the measurement of Social Support and Family Cohesion for adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 381-396.
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J.G.J., & van de Vijver F.J.R. (2001). A Comparison of Methods for the Evaluation of Construct Equivalence in a Multigroup Setting. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association. Retrieved via www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2001/Proceed/00106.pdf
