Developing the Index of Governance as a Guide in Reducing Poverty and Inequality for the Achievement of Sustainable Development in the Respective County Governments in Kenya

Authors

  • William Sagini Oribu School of Business and Economics, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342, 01000, Thika, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.106.12583

Keywords:

Governance, Service delivery, Accountability, Economic Development, Sustainability, Governance Index, Poverty, Inequality

Abstract

Governance encompasses all aspects through which power is exercised through the formal and informal institutions in the management of the available resources in a community. In order to determine the quality of governance there is need to look at the impact that the exercise of power will have on the quality of life that citizens enjoy.  In pursued of good governance, supervisory bodies must assess whether the policies and institutions put in place by the state are appropriate in impacting on the sustainable development of the citizens. Although there has not been a quantifiable definition of what good governance, debates on the appropriate role of the state together with appropriate policies and institutions are carried out by relying on information that is not based on facts or careful study. The purpose of this conceptual paper is therefore to look at the available literature on quality governance in conjunction with the legal and institutional frameworks in Kenya to determine what may need to be done to improve public service delivery. The identified key observable aspects of the governance dimensions will then be recommended for consideration in order to provide an enabling environment for the achievement of community sustainability. Further this paper suggests the types of research that will need to be conducted in order to obtain data for use in constructing the index of governance quality for specific county governments in Kenya.

References

Blair, H. (1996). “Supporting Democratic Local Governance: Lessons from International Donor Experience –Initial Concepts and Some Preliminary Findings.” Paper Presented at American Political Science Association Meeting, San Francisco, CA, August 29 – September 1

CGA (County Governments Act), 2012. Government Printer, Kenya.

Crook, R. & Manor, J. (1994). Enhancing Participation and Institutional Performance: Democratic Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa, London: Overseas Development Administration.

Deninger, K. & Squire, L. (1996). Measuring Income Inequality: A new Data Base.” World Bank Economic Review 10(3): 565 – 591.

GoK (Government of Kenya), 2010. The Constitution of Kenya. Government Printer, Nairobi.

Hansen, C. (1996). Constituencies for Reform. USAID Program and Operations Assessment Report No. 12. Arlington, VA: USAID Development Information Services Clearinghouse.

Hope, K. R. (2012). The Political Economy of Development in Kenya. New York. Continuum Books.

Hope, K. R. (2002). “The New Public Management: A Perspective from Africa,” In K. McLaughlin, S. R. Osborn, & E. Ferlie (eds), New Public Management: Current Trends and Prospects.” London: Routledge. Pp. 210 – 226.

Huther, J. & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper 1894, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Huther, J. Roberts, S. & Shah, A. (1997). Public Sector Reform under Adjustment Lending: Lessons from World Bank Experiences. Discussion Paper 382, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Isahakia M. (2011). “Preface”, In OPM/PSTD (Office of the Prime Minister/Public Sector Transformation

Department (2010): Public Sector Transformation Strategy: From Reform to Transformation, 2010 – 14. Nairobi.

Shah, A. (1994). The Reform in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Shah, A. (1995). “Design of Economic Institutions,” Canadian Economic Journal, 29 (Suppl. 1): 614 – 618.

Oribu, W. S (2022). Developing the Index of Governance as a Guide in Reducing Poverty and Inequality for the Achievement of Sustainable

Shah, A. (1998a). “Balance, Accountability and Responsiveness: Lessons about Decentralization,” Policy Research Working Paper 2021, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Shah, A. (1998b). “Indonesia and Pakistan: Fiscal Decentralization – An Elusive Goal? In Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries, ed. Richard M. Bird & Francois Vaillencourt, 115 – 151, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tanzi, V. (1996). “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects,” In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1995, 295 – 316. Washington, DC: World Bank.

OP/PSRD [(Office of the President/Public Service Reform and Development Secretariat), (2005)]. “Donor/GoK Consultative Meeting.

OPM/PCD [(Office of the Prime Minister/Performance Contradicting Department), (2011)]. Report on Evaluation of the Performance of Public Agencies for the Financial Year 2009/2010. Nairobi: OPM/PCD. OPM/PSTD [(Office of the Prime Minister/Public Sector Transformation Department), (2010)]. Public Sector Transformation Strategy: From Reform to Transformation 2010 – 14. Nairobi.

Picciotto, R. (1995). “Putting Institutional Economics at Work.” World Bank Discussion Paper 304, Washington, DC: World Bank.

PFM [(Public Finance and Management Act), (2012)]. Government Printer, Kenya.

World Bank (2001). Implementation Completion Report on a Credit in the amount of SDRs 17.2 million to the Government of the Republic of Kenya for an Institutional Development and Civil Service Reform Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (1992). Governance and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (1994). Governance – The World Bank’s Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-25

How to Cite

Oribu, W. S. (2022). Developing the Index of Governance as a Guide in Reducing Poverty and Inequality for the Achievement of Sustainable Development in the Respective County Governments in Kenya. Archives of Business Research, 10(6), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.106.12583