Raw Material Sustainability And The Performance Of Beverage Companies In Nigeria: A Study Of Intafact Beverages Onitsha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.63.4043Abstract
This study examined the Effect of Raw Material Resource Sustainability on the Viability of Organizations. The study adopted survey research approach in its design and covered a population of 236 members of staff while its sample size was 182 members of staff. The data used in this study were generated from both primary and secondary sources. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) was used to calculate the reliability index which yielded a 94% output. The statistical tools used for data analysis were simple percentage (%) and Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) using the 20.0 version of statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). The study analyzed empirical data generated from a well structured valid and consistent questionnaire and posited that the viability of manufacturing organizations especially those in the beverage industry is significantly influenced by raw material resource sustainability. Moreover, the strength of the effect of raw material resource sustainability appears to be felt more on financial viability and less on management model viability. It was recommended among others that Organizations that must be viable must consciously develop sustainable raw material resources that will facilitate through backward integration cost and time efficiency in their raw material resource value chain, which is a significant impetus for the financial viability of organizations and that integrating the value chain of the organization can enhance the sustainability of raw material resource of manufacturing firms.
References
Abidin, N.Z., (2010). Applying competitive strategy in quantity surveying firms: An evolving process. Asian Journal of Management Research, 2(1)
Adams, W.M. (2006). The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31. Available online: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.
Anan, S. and A. Sen (2000). Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development Vol. 28 No. 12,
Botta, M. (2005), Towards sustainable renovation. Three research projects. Doctoral dissertation. TRITA-ARK-Akademisk avhandling 2005:4, Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology Available online: http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:14564/FULLTEXT01.
CIPD (2012). Responsible and Sustainable Business: HR leading the way – A collection of “thought pieces”. London: CIPD.
Colbert, B. and Kurucz, E. (2007). Three conceptions of triple bottom line business sustainability and the role for HRM, Human Resource Planning 30.
Corbett, C. J. & Klassen, R., (2006). Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as Key to Improving Operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 8
Daly, Herman E. (1991). Steady-state economics. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Figge, F., T. Hahn, S. Schaltegger and M. Wagner. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – Linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy, Business Strategy and the Environment Vol 11
Gluch & Baumann (2004). The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making, Building and Environment, Vol 39
Littig, B. & Grießler E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catch word between political pragmatism and social theory, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 8 No. ½,
Rao, S., & Brownhill, D. (2001). European green building forum 2 - green file. EU: Brussels
Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity. Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam International Discussion Paper 2012-02-13
Srivastava, S. K., 2008. Network design for reverse logistics. The International Journal of Management Science, Omega
Stahel, W. (2001). From design for environment to designing sustainable solutions, in M. Tolba (Ed). Our Fragile World: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development, Vol. II, EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd.
Stavins, R.N., A.F. Wagner and G. Wagner (2003). Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity, Economic Letters Vol. 79.
Stern, D.I. (1997). The Capital Theory Approach to Sustainability: A Critical Appraisal, Journal of Economic Issues,
Theis T and Tomkin J (2012). Sustainability: A Comprehensive Foundation. Connexions: Rice University
Thomsen, A. and K. van der Flier (2009). Replacement or renovation of dwellings: the relevance of a more sustainable approach. Building and Research Information, Vol. 37 No. 5-6,
United Nations (1987), Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Available online: http://www.un documents.net/ourcommon-future
WBCSD (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility. The WBCSD’s Journey. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Archives of Business Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.