The Mediating Effect of Transparency on the Relationship Between Digitalization and Revenue Generation, Public Participation, and Allocation Efficiency

Authors

  • Ernest Oti-Akenteng Department of Accounting and Finance Valley View University, Oyibi, Accra, Ghana
  • Evans O. N. D. Ocansey Department of Accounting and Finance Valley View University, Oyibi, Accra, Ghana
  • Felix Oppong Asamoah Department of Accounting and Finance Valley View University, Oyibi, Accra, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1305.18804

Keywords:

Digitalization, Transparency, Revenue Generation, Public Participation, Allocation Efficiency, Governance, Ghana, Public Sector Reform, Institutional Quality, Mediation Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the mediating role of transparency in the relationship between digitalization and three critical governance outcomes: revenue generation, public participation, and allocation efficiency within the context of local governments in Ghana. While digital transformation has been widely promoted as a solution to inefficiencies in public sector management, empirical evidence on its effectiveness—particularly when transparency is considered—remains limited in sub-Saharan African contexts. The main objective of the study is to examine whether transparency acts as a conduit through which digitalization improves fiscal performance, citizen engagement, and resource distribution. It also aims to assess the extent to which institutional quality and political stability influence these relationships. The study adopts a quantitative research design, using secondary panel data from 2010 to 2022 sourced from the World Bank, Bank of Ghana, and Our World in Data. Statistical analyses—including regression modeling and mediation analysis—were performed using EViews 12 to test the direct and indirect effects of digitalization on the dependent variables. The findings reveal that transparency significantly mediates the relationship between digitalization and both revenue generation and allocation efficiency, while its effect on public participation is unexpectedly negative, suggesting a disconnect between formal transparency efforts and citizen engagement. Digitalization alone was found to have no direct significant impact on any of the three outcomes, underscoring the importance of institutional context and information accessibility. These results offer practical implications for governance reforms, emphasizing the need for digital strategies to be embedded within transparent, participatory, and user-centered frameworks. The study also contributes to accounting and public administration literature by positioning transparency as a vital link between digital innovation and governance outcomes

References

Arwanto, A. (2018). Public Participation, Transparency- The Utilisation of Social Media Bandung City. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0057.1-26

Axenbeck, J., Berner, A., & Kneib, T. (2024). What drives the relationship between digitalization and energy demand? Exploring heterogeneity in German manufacturing firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 369, 122317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122317

Chen, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). Digital transformation and firm performance: a case study on China’s listed companies in 2009–2020. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-023-00018-x

Dzwigol, H., Lyulyov, O., Kwilinski, A., & Pimonenko, T. (2024). Digitalization and Energy in Attaining Sustainable Development: Impact on Energy Consumption, Energy Structure, and Energy Intensity. Energies, 17(5), 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051213

Gariba, M. I., Arthur, E. E., & Odei, S. A. (2024). Assessing the impact of public digitalization on sustainability: the mediating role of technological innovation in the context of the EU. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00397-x

Güler, M., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). A Survey of Digital Government: Science Mapping Approach, Application Areas, and Future Directions. Systems, 11(12), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120563

Jiang, K., Chen, Z., & Zhou, M. (2024). Digitalization and firms’ systematic risk in China. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2931

Langella, C., Sicilia, M., Botica Redmayne, N., & Anessi‐Pessina, E. (2021). Financial reporting transparency, citizens’ understanding, and public participation: A survey experiment study. Public Administration, 101(2), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12804

Li, D., & Yu, P. (2017). The Influence of Fiscal Transparency on Financial Capital Allocation Efficiency. Journal of Finance and Economics, 42(02), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2016.02.004

Li, Y., & Zhao, T. (2024). How Digital Transformation Enables Corporate Sustainability: Based on the Internal and External Efficiency Improvement Perspective. Sustainability, 16(12), 5037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125037

Martin, M. M. (2024). THE EFFECTS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON BUDGET TRANSPARENCY IN KENYA. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v8i2.1652

Mbengue, M. M., & Tignino, M. (2005). Transparency, Public Participation, and Amicus Curiae in Water Disputes (pp. 367–405). oxford university pressoxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199274673.003.0016

Mei, B., Khan, S. U., Ali, M. A. S., Luo, J., & Khan, A. A. (2023). Variation of digital economy’s effect on carbon emissions: improving energy efficiency and structure for energy conservation and emission reduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(37), 87300–87313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28010-0

Mountasser, T., & Abdellatif, M. (2023). Digital Transformation in Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(10), e02372. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i10.2372

Nielsen, J., Stewart, C., Eckstein, L., & Nicol, D. (2021). Integrating Public Participation, Transparency and Accountability Into Governance of Marketing Authorisation for Genome Editing Products. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.747838

Putri, P., & Lujala, P. (2023). Assessing the Transformative Potential of Extractive Sector Transparency Initiatives: Evidence from Local Oil Revenue Management in Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1787–1806. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2244635

Qiao, G., Li, Y., & Hong, A. (2024). The Strategic Role of Digital Transformation: Leveraging Digital Leadership to Enhance Employee Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Digital Era. Systems, 12(11), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110457

Shaxnoza, J. (2024). Impact of E-Governance on Public Service Efficiency. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(10), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.229

Wang, C., Guo, J., Qin, S., & Xu, W. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on corporate green governance under carbon peaking and neutrality goals: Evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0302432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302432

Wang, C., Guo, J., Qin, S., & Xu, W. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on corporate

Xu, H. (2024). How does digital government affect energy efficiency? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(7), 1524–1544. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-01-2024-0029

Zheng, Y., Qin, K., & Li, Z. (2022). The relationship between public participation willingness, public participation behaviour, and innovative city construction performance. International Journal of Data Science, 7(4), 310. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijds.2022.128391

Downloads

Published

2025-05-28

How to Cite

Oti-Akenteng, E., Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Asamoah, F. O. (2025). The Mediating Effect of Transparency on the Relationship Between Digitalization and Revenue Generation, Public Participation, and Allocation Efficiency. Archives of Business Research, 13(05), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1305.18804