Investigate Students’ Attitudes toward Computer Based Test (CBT) at Chemistry Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.46.2325Keywords:
ComputerBasedTest(CBT), Chemistrycourse, UndergraduateStudents, computerexperienceAbstract
Computer Based Assessment (CBT) is being a highly widespread method to assess students’ fulfillment at the university level. This study seeks to examine the attitude of the students towards computer-based test (CBT) at the KAU-Saudi Arabia Jeddah. Quantitative approach using survey questionnaire was adopted to carry out the current study using convenience-sampling technique. The sample consists of (60) undergraduate students who had taken the exam on CBT were selected from college of science-chemistry department to examine their perceptions towards CBT. To achieve this aim, the researchers examine the possibility of using student feedback in the effectiveness of this method in assessment. The findings show that: the majority of respondents have positive attitude towards CBT, (83.7%) of students said they were competent with the use of computer due to their prior experience. Regarding test administration, they reported that there are some errors in the chemical equations, formulas, construction in the exam sections, and inadequate time. Nevertheless, they achieved the exam successfully and reached satisfaction through CBT features such as direct scoring, validity, and transparency in grading. The bottom line, CBT experience will become favorable for students and then will earn its effectiveness in the context of assessments methods.
References
Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G. and Despotakis, T. 2009 Computer Based Testing Using “Digital Ink”: Participatory Design of a Tablet PC Based Assessment Application for Secondary Education. Computers & Education, 52, 811-819.
Shah, J. H. 2002 Validity and Credibility of Public Examinations in Pakistan. An Unpublished Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Ph. D., in the Department of Education, Islamic University Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Havens, A. 2002 Examinations and Learning: An Activity-Theoretical Analysis of the Relationship between Assessment and Learning.
Rehmani, A. 2003 Impact of Public Examination System on Teaching and Learning in Pakistan. Retrieved December 24, 2010 from http://www.aku.edu/AKUEB/pdfs/pubexam.pdf
.
Sim, G., Holifield, P., & Brown, M. 2004 Implementation of Computer Assisted Assessment: Lessons from the Literature. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 12(3), 217-233.
Uysal, O. and Kuzu, A. 2009 A Thesis Proposal: Quality Standards of Online Higher Education in Turkey. Internationalization and the Role of University Networks. Proceedings of the 2009 EMUNI Conference on Higher Education and Research, Potorož, Sloveni.
McKenna, C. 2001 Introducing Computers into Assessment Process: What is the Impact upon Academic Practice? Paper Presented at Higher Education Close Up Conference 2, Lancaster University, 16-18 July. Retrieved November 4, 2004 from http://leeds.ac.uk
.
Lim, E. CH., Ong, B. KC., Wilder-Smith, E. PV., & Seet, R. CS. 2006 Computer-based Versus Pen-and-paper Testing: Students’ Perception. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 35(9), 599-603.
Whittington, D., Bull, J., & Danson, M. 2000 Web-Based Assessment: Two UK Initiatives. The Sixth Australian World Wide Web Conference, Rihga Colonial Club Resort, Cairns, 12-17 June 2000, Australia.
Conole, G., & Warburton, B. 2005 A Review of Computer Assisted Assessment. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 13(1), 17-31.
Fluck, A., Pullen, D., and Harper, C. 2009 Case study of a computer based examination system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 509-523.
Powers, D. E. & O’Neill, K. 1993 Inexperienced and anxious computer users: coping with a computer-administered test of academic skills. Education Assessment, 1(2), 153-173.
Karadeniz, S. 2009 The impacts of paper, web and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement and perceptions. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(10), 984-991. Retrieved May 15, 2011 from http://www.academicjournals.org/sre
.
Leeson, H. 2006 The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(1), 1-24.
Yurdabakan, I. 2012 Primary School Students' Attitudes towards Computer Based Testing and Assessment in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(12), 177-188.
Pomplun, M., Ritchie, T., & Custer, M. 2006 Factors in paper-and-pencil and computer reading score differences at the primary grades. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 127-143.
Pomplun, M., & Custer, M. 2005 The score comparability of computerized and paper-and-pencil formats for K-3 reading tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 153-166.
Bennett, R. E. 2015 The Changing Nature of Educational Assessment. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 370-407.
Bennett, R. E., Braswell, J., Oranje, A., Sandene, B., Kaplan, B., & Yan, F. 2008 Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(9), 1-39.
Gallagher, A., Bridgeman, B. & Cahalan, C. 2002 The Effect of Computer-Based Tests on Racial-Ethnic and Gender Groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(2), 133-147.
Terzis, V. and Economides, A. A. 2011 The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment. Computers & Education, 56, 1032-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
.
Williams, B. 2007 Students’ perception of pre-hospital web-based examinations. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 3(1), 54-63.
Ozden, M. Y., Erturk, I., & Sanli, R. 2004 Students’ perception of online assessment: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 77-92.
Johnson, M. & Green, S. 2004 On-line assessment: the impact of mode on students’ strategies, perceptions and behaviours. University of Cambridge.
Russell, M. & O’Connor, K. 2003 Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A look back and into the future. Lynch School of Education. InTASC publications.
McVay, R. B. 2002 An examination of computer anxiety related to achievement on paper-and-pencil and Computer-Based knowledge testing of United States air force technical training students. PhD Thesis. University of North Texas.
Millsap, C. M. 2000 Comparison of computer testing versus traditional paper and pencil testing. PhD Thesis. University of North Texas.
Pellegrino, J. W. & Quellmalz, E. S. 2010 Perspectives on the integration of technology and assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 119-134.
Kapoor, S., & Welch, C. 2011 Comparability of paper and computer administrations in terms of proficiency interpretations. Paper presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
Poggio, J. & McJunkin, L. 2012 History, current practice, perspectives and what the future holds for computer based assessment in K-12 education. In R. W. Lissitz & H. Jiao (Eds.), Computers and their impact on state assessments (pp. 25-53). Charlotte.
Bodmann, S. M., & Robinson, D. H. 2004 Speed and performance differences among computer-based and paper-pencil tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 51-60.
Ripley, M. 2009 Transformational computer-based testing. In F. Scheurmann & J. Bjornsson (Eds.), The Transition to Computer-Based Assessment (pp. 89-91). Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Dean, V. & Martineau, J. 2012 A state perspective on enhancing assessment and accountability systems through systematic implementation of technology. In R. W. Lissitz & H. Jiao (Eds.), Computers and their impact on state assessments (pp. 25-53). Charlo.
Bridgeman, B. 2009 Experiences from large-scale computer-based testing in the USA. In F. Scheurmann & J. Bjornsson (Eds.), The Transition to Computer-Based Assessment (pp. 39-44). Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Darrell, L. B. 2003 The Impact of Computer-Based Testing on Student Attitudes and Behavior. The Technology Source.
Fyfe, G., Meyer, J., Fyfe, S., Ziman, M., Sanders, K., & Hill, J. n.d. Self-evaluation of assessment performance can enhance student’s perception of feedback on computer-generated tests.
Sorana-Daniela, B. & Lorentz, J. 2007 Computer-based testing on physical chemistry topic: A case study. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 3(1), 94-95.
Terzis, V. and Economides, A. A. 2011 Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2108-2122.
Ko, C. C. and Cheng, C. D. 2008 Flexible and Secure Computer-Based Assessment Using a Single Zip Disk. Computers and Education, 50, 915-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.010
.
Gvozdenko, E., & Chambers, D. 2007 Beyond test accuracy: Benefits of measuring response time in computerized testing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 542-558.
Saad, S. A. 2009 Computer-based testing vs. Paper-based testing: Establishing the comparability of Reading Tests through the Evolution of a New Comparability Model in a Saudi EFL context. PhD Thesis. University of Essex.
John, C. K., Cynthia, G. P., Judith, A. S., & Tim, D. 2002 Practical Considerations in Computer-Based Testing. Sheridan Books. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jimoh, R. G., Abdul Jaleel Kehinde Shittu and Kawu, Yakub Kola. 2012 Students' Perception of Computer Based Test (CBT) for Examining Undergraduate Chemistry Courses. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(2), 125.
Russell, M. & O’Connor, K. 2003 Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A look back and into the future. Lynch School of Education. In TASC publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Archives of Business Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
