U.S. Business Schools’ Expansion to The Global Market: Positioning Strategy and Market Competition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.117.15034Keywords:
Business schools, two factor model, internationalization, positioning strategyAbstract
In the last decade, higher education institutions in the United States have experienced an increasing trend of internationalization, more and more universities have been aggressively recruiting international students. The enrollment of international students in US Universities has increased from 564,766 in the year 2004-2005 to 974,926 in the year 2014-2015, a 72.3 % increase in ten years. Due to COVID, there were 1.25 million international students studying in the US last year. This is 17.86 percent lower than the 2019-2020 academic year (data from the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). Business schools in the United State stand on the frontier of internationalization. Some universities even have started to build satellite campuses and programs in other countries. Examples include Duke University built its campus in Kunshan China, and NYU built its campus in Shanghai, China. Based on the information provided by the Institute of International Education (iie.org), business and management programs have been continually ranked as number one in international student enrollment. Of the 974,926 international students enrolled in high education institutions in the United States in 2014-2015, 20.2% of them enrolled in Business and Management programs, with a total number of 197,258 students. In the years of 2020, the number of international students in USA business and management programs is 174,470, a slight drop from previous years due to COVID-19.
In the United States, there are more than two thousand business schools, of which five hundred and fifteen (515) are accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International). Each of these schools has a different ownership entity, either a private university or a public-owned university. In addition, each of them has different brand name recognition by the students, parents, and peers as well. Some schools’ brand names are highly recognized in the market, while others may not be well known at all. What are the appropriate strategies when these schools internationalize their program? In this paper, we propose a two-factor model, using ownership entity and brand name recognition as to conduct a taxonomy of US business schools. We classify business schools into four groups and further propose different positioning strategies for the four groups.
Our research contributes to the literature on the internationalization of business programs in several ways. First, our two factors classification system for the business schools results in four groups of business school types, each of which has its unique supporting resources, academic reputations, and entity ownership structure. We further provide different positioning strategies for each type of school and college. The positioning strategies and the associated curriculum design as well as the supporting resources will then serve as a competition tool to attract future international students. Finally, our framework could provide guidance for the business school deans and the other university administrators for their action formulation.
References
Aggarwal, Raj; Zhan, Feng. Perspectives and Challenges in Developing Global Mind-Sets: Introduction. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Apr-Jun 2018, Vol. 29. no. 2, p91-95.
Aggarwal, Raj; Goodell, John W. Globalizing International Business Education via Experiential Learning. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Apr-Jun 2014, Vol. 25. no. 2, p79-82.
Alon, Ilan; McAllaster, Craig M. Measuring the Global Footprint of an MBA. Journal of Studies in International Education. Dec 2009, Vol. 13. no. 4, p522-540.
Bradford, Henry; Guzmán, Alexander; Trujillo, María–Andrea. Determinants of successful internationalization processes in business schools. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management. Aug 2017, Vol. 39. no. 4, p435-452.
Bruner, Robert F.; Iannarelli, Juliane. Globalization of Management Education. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Oct-Dec 2011, Vol. 22. no. 4, p232-242.
Clinebell, SharonK.; Kvedaravičienė, Ieva. Facilitating Cross-Cultural Management Education Through Global Faculty Exchanges. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2013, Vol. 24. no. 1, p44-61.
Dixon, Rob; Slanickova, Daniela; Warwick, Philip. Business School Partnerships for Globalization. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jul-Dec 2013, Vol. 24. no. 3/4, p198-213.
Huják, Janka. Study Abroad Programs as Tools of Internationalization: Which Factors Influence Hungarian Business Students to Participate? Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2015, Vol. 26. no. 1, p56-76.
International Students Studying in the United States: Trends and Impacts, https://www.boundless.com/research/international-students-studying-in-the-united-states-trendsand-impacts/
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2000, April 12). Globalization: Threats or opportunity. Author. Available from http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200to.htm#II
Kedia, BenL.; Englis, Paula D. Internationalizing Business Education for Globally Competent Managers. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2011, Vol. 22. no. 1, p13-28.
Krivogorsky, Victoria; Ballam, Mark J. Teaching an international course in the business school: A new blended approach. Innovations in Education & Teaching International. Jun 2019, Vol. 56. no. 3, p330-340.
Le, Quan; Ling, Teresa; Yau, Jot. Do International Cocurricular Activities Have an Impact on Cultivating a Global Mindset in Business School Students? Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2018, Vol. 29. no. 1, p62-75.
Miglietti, Cynthia. Teaching Business Classes Abroad: How International Experience Benefits Faculty, Students, and Institutions. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2015, Vol. 26. no. 1, p46-55. 10p.
Naidoo, Vik. From Ivory Towers to International Business: Are Universities Export Ready in Their Recruitment of International Students? Journal of Studies in International Education. Mar 2010, Vol. 14. no. 1, p5-28.
Ramakrishna, Hindupur; Sarkar, Avijit; Vijayaraman, Bindiganavale. Factors Affecting the Design of Short-Term Study-Abroad Programs: An Exploratory Study of Two Business Schools. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Apr-Sep 2016, Vol. 27. no. 2/3, p124-141.
Shooshtari, Nader H.; Manuel, Timothy A. Curriculum Internationalization at AACSB Schools: Immersive Experiences, Student Placement, and Assessment. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Apr-Jun 2014, Vol. 25. no. 2, p134-156.
Steagall, Jeffrey W.; Falk, Peter; Gallo, Andres; Porter, Thomas W. International Double Degree Programs as Accelerators for Internationalization: Lessons from the Trans-Atlantic Business School Alliance. Journal of Teaching in International Business. Jan-Mar 2021, Vol. 32. no. 1, p7-35.
Which full-time MBA programs have the most international students? https://www.usnews.com/bestgraduate-schools/top-business-schools/international-students-rankings
Williams, Kim M.; Best, Gary. Short Study Tours Abroad: Internationalizing Business Curricula. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism. Jul-Sep 2014, Vol. 14. no. 3, p240-259.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yong Cao, Lei Zhang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.