Assessment of RCS-specific SNR and Loglikelihood Function in Detecting Low-observable Targets and Drones Illuminated by a Low Probability of Intercept Radar Operating in Littoral Regions

Authors

  • Perambur Neelakanta
  • Dolores De Groff

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.94.10512

Keywords:

Low-observable/Stealth Target, Radar Cross-section (RCS), Low Probability of Interception (LPI) Radar, Ultrawideband (UWB) Radar, Loglikelihood Function, Maximum Likelihood (ML) Estimation

Abstract

The objective of this study is to deduce signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) based loglikelihood function involved in detecting low-observable targets (LoTs) including drones Illuminated by a low probability of intercept (LPI) radar operating in littoral regions. Detecting obscure targets and drones and tracking them in near-shore ambient require ascertaining signal-related track-scores determined as a function of radar cross section (RCS) of the target. The stochastic aspects of the RCS depend on non-kinetic features of radar echoes due to target-specific (geometry and material) characteristics; as well as, the associated radar signals signify randomly-implied, kinetic signatures inasmuch as, the spatial aspects of the targets fluctuate significantly as a result of random aspect-angle variations caused by self-maneuvering and/or by remote manipulations (as in drones).  Hence, the resulting mean RCS value would decide the SNR and loglikelihood ratio (LR) of radar signals gathered from the echoes and relevant track-scores decide the performance capabilities of the radar. A specific study proposed here thereof refers to developing computationally- tractable algorithm(s) towards detecting and tracking hostile LoTs and/or drones flying at low altitudes over the sea (at a given range, R) in littoral regions by an LPI radar. Estimation of relevant detection-theoretic parameters and decide track-scores in terms of maximum likelihood (ML) estimates are presented and discussed.

References

Aytug, D. Detection and jamming low probability of intercept (LPI) radars. M.S. System Engineering Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA, September, 2006.

Jiangang, H., Ran, T., Shan, T., A novel LPI radar signal based on hyperbolic frequency hopping combined with Barker phase code. Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, (ICSP '04, 31 Aug.-4 Sept. 2004, Beijing, China), vol.3, pp. 2070-2073.

Trevithick, J., Air Force makes extremely rare mention of deployment of RQ-170 stealth drones. The Warzone. March 2021. Available at: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39753/air-force-makes-extremely-rareannouncement-about-deployment-of-rq-170-stealth-drones.

Sareen, S, Drone Terror Attack on Jammu Airport: A Deadly and Dangerous Dare, News 18, June 29, 2021. Available at: https://www.news18.com/news/opinion/drone-attack-in-jammu-a-deadly-and-dangerous-dare-3905669.html

Rzewuski, S., Kulpa, K., Salski, B., Kopyt, P., Borowiec, K., Malanowski, M., Drone RCS estimation using simple nd experimental measurement in WIFI bands. 2018 22 International Microwave and Radar Conference (MIKON 2018, 14-17 May 2018, Poznan, Poland), pp. 695-698.

de Quevedo, Á. D., Urzaiz, F. I., Menoyo, J. G., López, A. A., Drone Detection and RCS Measurements with Ubiquitous Radar. 2018 International Conference on Radar (RADAR), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1-6.

Patel, J., Fioranelli, S., F., Anderson, D., Review of radar classification and RCS characterisation techniques for small UAVs or drones. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2018 12(9), pp. 911-919.

Pace, P. E., Detecting and Classifying Low Probability of Intercept Radar, Artech House, 2008, Norwood, MA, USA.

Ong, P. G., Teng, H. K., Digital LPI radar detector, MS System Engineering Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2001, Monterey, California, USA.

Taboada, F. L., Detection and classification of low probability of intercept radar signals using parallel filter arrays and higher order statistics. M.S. Systems Engineering., Naval Postgraduate School, 2002, Monterey, California, USA].

Skolnik, M., Introduction to Radar Systems, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2002 New York, NY: USA.

Skolnik, M., Radar Handbook, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008, New York, NY: USA

Parthasarathy, T., and P. S. Neelakantaswamy, P. S., Statistical aspects of radar cross-section analysis. Electro Technology, Jan./Feb. 1972, pp.21-27.

Marcum, J. I., A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-6, 1960, 59—267.

Swerling, P., Probability of detection for fluctuating targets. Technical Report RM-1217, Rand Corporation, March 17, 1954.

Swerling, P., Probability of detection for fluctuating targets. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-6, 1960, 269—308.

Swerling, P., More on detection of fluctuating targets. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-11, 1965, 459— 460.

Swerling, P., Recent developments in target models for radar detection analysis. 1970 AGARD Avionics Tech. Symposium Proceedings, Istanbul, Turkey, May 25—29, 1970.

Shnidman, D. A., Determination of required SNR values radar detection. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2002, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1059-1064.

S.K. Chatterjee, Neelakantaswamy, P. S., Chatterjee, R., Measurement of back-scattering cross- sections of metallic bodies of revolution at X-band. Journal of Institution of Engineers (India), ET-9, 1969, pp. 87-93.

Scholefield, P. H. R., Statistical aspects of ideal radar targets, Proceedings of the IEEE, 1967, 55(4), pp. 587-589,

Song, X., Blair, W., Zhou, S., Dominant-plus-Rayleigh Models for RCS: Swerling III/IV versus Rician, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2013, 49(3), pp.2058-2064

Chen, S., Huang, P., Ji, J., Radar cross section fluctuation characteristics of typical stealth aircraft. Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(12), pp.3304-3314.

Neelakanta, P. S., De Groff, D., Sudhakar, R., Low-altitude target detection by coastline operated marine radar. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic System, 1992, 28(1), pp. 217-222.

Slocumb, B. J., Klusman III, M. E., A multiple model SNR/RCS likelihood ratio score for radar-based feature-aided tracking, Proceedings SPIE 5913, (15 September 2005) Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2005, 59131N.

Blackman, S., Popoli, R., Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems, Artech House, 1999, Norwood, MA: USA

Blackman, S, S., Dempster, R., Description of the UEWR MHT tracker (revised), Technical Report, 2002, Raytheon Corporation, RE/R07/P572, PO Box 902, El Segundo, CA 90245: USA.

Zikidis, K., Skondras, A., Tokas, C., Low observable principles, stealth aircraft and anti-stealth technologies. 2nd Int'l Conference on Applications of Mathematics and Informatics in Military Sciences (AMIMS), April 11-12, 2013, Hellenic Military Academy, Vari, Athens, Greece.

Adam, J. A., How to design an invisible aircraft., IEEE Spectrum., 1988, 25(4), pp. 26-31.

Bahret, W. F., The beginnings of stealth technology., IEEE Transactions Aerospace Electronic Systems, 1993, 29(4), pp, 1377-1376.

Knott, E. F., Shaeffer, J. F., Tuley, M. T., Radar Cross Section. Artech House, 1985, Norwood, MA: USA.

Taylor, J. D., Introduction to Ultra-Wideband Radar Systems, CRC Press, 1995, Boca Raton, FL: USA

Noel, B., (Ed.): Ultra-Wideband Radar, Proceedings of the First Los Alamos Symposium. CRC Press, 1991, Boca Raton, FL: USA.

Bossé, E., Turner, R., Lecours, M., Tracking Swerling fluctuating targets at low altitude over the sea. IEEE Transactions Aerospace Electronic System, 1991, 27(5), 806-821.

Mendivil, E. D., Studies on Carrier-free (or Ultra-wideband) Radar Performance under Clutter and Stealth-Target Environments. MS Thesis, April 1996, College of Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL: USA.

Neelakanta, P. S., Handbook of Electromagnetic Materials: Monolithic and Composite versions and Their Applications. CRC Press, 1995, Boca Raton. FL: USA, Chapter 6.

Rothwell, E. J, Chen, K. M., Nyquist, D. P., Ross, J. E., Time-domain imaging airborne targets using ultra-wideband or short-pulse radar. IEEE Transactions Antennas Propagation, 1995, 43(3), pp. 327-329.

Kennaugh, E. M., Mottat, D. L., Transient and impulse response approximations. Proceedings IEEE, 1965, 53, pp.893-901.

Mohamed, N. J., Nonsinusoidal radar signal design for stealth targets. IEEE Transaction Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1995, 37(2), pp. 268-277.

Mohamed, N. J., Carrier-free radar signal design with MTI doppler processor. IEE Proceedings (Radar, Sonar Navigation), 1994, 141(1), pp. 59-64.

Mohamed, N. J., Resolution function of nonsinusoidal radar signals II: Range-velocity resolution with compression techniques. IEEE Transaction Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1991, 33(1), pp. 51-58.

Taha, B., and A. Shoufan, A., Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research. IEEE Access, 2019, pp. (99):1-1

The 911 Security Monthly Newsletter: Radar drone detection: Detect drones using radar sensors. Available at: https://www.911security.com/en-us/knowledge-hub/drone-detection/radar.

Neelakanta, P. S., Stampalia, A. K., De Groff, D., An actively controlled EM surface yielding backscattered microwave energy with a designed binary pattern of modulation: A novel design for RCS-control and RFID applications, Microwave Journal, December 2003, pp. 22-36.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30

How to Cite

Neelakanta, P. ., & Groff, D. D. . (2021). Assessment of RCS-specific SNR and Loglikelihood Function in Detecting Low-observable Targets and Drones Illuminated by a Low Probability of Intercept Radar Operating in Littoral Regions. Discoveries in Agriculture and Food Sciences, 9(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.94.10512