A comparison of the Exxon Valdez, Torrey Canyon and Amoco Cadiz oil spills: Challenges, lessons learned and impacts on International Environmental Legislation

Authors

  • Nana Boateng Regional Maritime University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12249

Keywords:

Amoco Cadiz, Exxon Valdez, Marine Environment, Oil Spill, Torrey Canyon

Abstract

Water forms a great chuck of our planet earth. It still remains the most cost-effective way of moving great volumes of cargoes from one location to the other. The marine environment is very fragile and that ecosystem should not be degraded. Human error accounts for over eighty percent of accidents that occur at sea. It is even more this disturbing if the pollution is by caused by oil. Oil contains hydrocarbons which are deadly with high toxicity and affecting the marine life and the immediate environment which surrounds the place of the spill. The ecosystem is thrown out of balance as substantial damage is done to the marine flora and fauna which is either severely damaged or die. When oil gets in contact with seawater, certain processes immediately occur. The processes are physical, chemical and biological in nature as in oil dispersion, evaporation, emulsification, and a biodegradation occurrence. Three major oil spills by namely the Exxon Valdez, Torrey Canyon and Amoco Cadiz greatly impacted the marine environment and its coastal surroundings. This paper will interrogate these marine environmental disasters and their impacts when these spills occurred. It will also explain the major challenges that occurred dump these major oil spills, the challenges and lessons learned and their culminating impacts on international environmental legislation.

References

Hӓnninnen, S. & Rytkönen (2004) Oil transportation and terminal development in the Gulf of Finland 141pp Edita Prima Oy. Helsinki

Gold, E. (2006) Gard Handbook on Protection of the Maritime Environment, Royale Corporate Print, London

Colombos, C.J. (1967) The International Law of the Sea, 6 rev. ed. (London: Longmans, 1967) pp 430-431

M’Gonigle R.M. & Zacher, M.L. (1979) Pollution, Politics and International Law. Tankers at Sea, (Berkeley & London: Berkeley U. Press, 1979)

Knapp, S. & Franses, P.H. (2009) Does ratification matter and do major conventions improve safety and decrease pollution in shipping? Marine Policy 33:5, 826-846

Scanlon, J. (2001) Increasingly intolerable boundaries: future control of environmental pollution. Journal of Hazadous Materials.86: 1-3, 121-133pp th

IMO (2012) Prevention of Pollution by Oil www.imo.org/Environment/maineframe Retrieved on 29 December, 2020

Devanney, J. (2006) The Tankship Tromedy. The Impending Disasters in Tankers 401pp. The CTX press, Tavernier th

Fiocco, R. J. & Lewis, A. (1999) Oil Spill dispersants Pure Appl.Chem.Vol.71 pp 27-42 IUPAC Retrieved on 28 December, 2020 www.iupac.org

Beyon, L.R. (1967) The Torrey Canyon Incident. A review of events. The British Petroleum Company Limited, September, 1967.p2 th

CEDRE (2008) Amoco Cadiz http://www.cedre.fr/en/spill/amoco/amoco.php Retrieved on 29 December,

United States. (1989). Oil spill liability and compensation: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Water Resources of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, June 28, 1989. Washington D.C.: U.S. G.P.O.

Fairhall, D. & Jordan, P. (1980) Black tide rising. The wreck of the Amoco Cadiz. Andre Deutsch Limited. London. 1980

Smith, J. E. (1968). 'Torrey Canyon’ pollution and marine life. A report by the Plymouth Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.

ITOPF (2012) www.itopf.com/information.services/data-and-statistics/case-histories

IMO (2012a) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL) www.imo.org/TCD/Contents.asp

WWF (2009) Lessons Not Learned.20 Years After the Exxon Valdez Disaster. Retrieved on 24 March, 2022

NYT (2007) U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Exxon’s appeal of damages in Alaska Spill. New York Times th th 29 October,2007 Retrieved on 29 March, 2022 www.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/business/worldnews/29ihtexxon.4.8106572

EVOSTC (2009) Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council (2009) Legacy of Oil Spill.20 Years After the Exxon Valdez.2009 Status Report 37pp.Northern Printing, Anchorage

Cleveland, C.J. (2008) Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. In book Saundry P.(edit) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration http://www.eoearth.org/article/ Exxon_valdez_oil_spill Retrieved 20th March, 2022

Skinner, S. K. (1989) The EXXON VALDEZ Oil Spill. A Report to the president. Prepared by the National Response Team, Secretary, Department of Transportation and Environment Protection Agency. May 1989 www.nrt.org/epa/nrt/home.nsf/Resources/publications/$FILE/spill.pdf Retrieved on 20 March, 2022

COPA (1988) Committee on Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (1998) Double-Hull Tanker Legislation: An Assessment of the Oil pollution Act of 1990. 286pp. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. st

Huijer, K. (2005) Trends in Oil Spills from Tanker Ships 1995-2004 www.itopf.com Retrieved on 21 March,

Meleen, N.H. (2003) “Torrey Canyon” Environmental Encyclopedia 2003 www.encyclopaedia.com/article. Retrieved on 20th March, 2022

Downloads

Published

2022-05-25

How to Cite

Boateng, N. (2022). A comparison of the Exxon Valdez, Torrey Canyon and Amoco Cadiz oil spills: Challenges, lessons learned and impacts on International Environmental Legislation. Archives of Business Research, 10(5), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12249