Effectiveness of the Digital and Technological Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in Cameroon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1003.11925Keywords:
Innovation, Entrepreneurship; Technology; CameroonAbstract
This study aims to investigate the factors associated with the effectiveness of the technological and digital entrepreneurship ecosystem (ECOTECH) in Cameroon. The methodology adopted consists of a range of semi-structured interviews in the ecosystem stakeholders. This was followed by a Pearson correlation analysis of a questionnaire submitted to 117 start-ups. The main results indicate that, the Cameroonian ECOTECH is a young and weakly effective environment. As far as start-ups are concerned, administrative difficulties, the distraction effect (increased involvement in activities not directly related to that of the start-up), and the lack of professionalism are closely linked to their ineffectiveness. Regarding the role of the state, start-ups value at 42.52% effective the efforts made by the government in improving the regulatory framework. The prevalence of the informal sector and the lack of infrastructure are among the reasons of this result. Regarding the role of incubators, although they have limited financial means to carry out their actions, start-ups rate their effectiveness at 63.5%. This result can be explained, among other things, by the interest for start-ups in the technical support and lobbying offered by incubators
References
Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review.
Aloini, a., Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., & Ponticelli, S. (2012). Supply chain management: a review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 735 - 761.
Chartier, A., & Rivière, M. (2018). Les effets secondaires de l’aide au développement: Comment l’aide stimule les jeux de pouvoir à Madagascar. Revue internationale des études du développement, 123-150.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davila, T. (2005). An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 223-248.
Elkington, P., & Smallman, C. (2002). Managing project risks: a case study from the utilities sector. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 49-57.
Freud, C. (2011). L’aide au développement. Cahiers d’études africaines , 202-203.
Gitahy, & José, J. d. (2013). The use of information and communication technologies in teaching practice. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, 7(2), 359-380.
Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48.
Isenberg, D. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review.
ITU. (2018). Mesurer la société de l’information.
Jdidi, R., & Redouaby, M. (2020). Revue Internationale d’Economie Numérique. Le rôle du management des risques des projets dans la réussite des startups : une étude de la littérature, 2(1), 107-115.
Keogh, D., & Johnson, D. (2021). Survival of the funded: Econometric analysis of startup longevity and success. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 17(4), 29-49.
Krejcí, M., Strielkowski, W., & Cabelkova, I. (2015). Factors that influence the success of small and medium enterprises in ICT: A case study from the Czech Republic. Verslas Teorija ir Praktika, 16, 304-315.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.
Levie, J., Autio, E., Reeves, J., Chisholm, D., Harris, J., Grey, S., . . . Cleevely, M. (2013). Assessing regional innovative entrepreneurship ecosystems with the global entrepreneurship and development index: the case of Scotland Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship. University of Strathclyde.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entreperneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurhip. The Hague: LEED Workshop on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship.
Mayegle, F.-X., & Ngah, B. (2014). Internal Governance Mechanisms and Value Creation of the Company: A Study of Large and Small and Medium Enterprises in Cameroon. International Journal of Business and Management Archives, 9(7).
Okolouma, A. (2018). La réforme de la protection sociale au Cameroun : vers un changement de logique d’extension de la couverture sociale. Revue française des affaires sociales, 189-209.
Partech. (2020 ). Africa Tech Venture Capital Report.
Plane, J. (2015). Les théories de la contingence. In J. Plane, Théories du leadership: Modèles classiques et contemporains (pp. 73-98). Paris: Dunod.
Popova. (2006). Is Professionalism the Way to Success?:The Social and Professional Characteristics of the Rich and the Poor. Sociological Research, 45(1), 41-58.
Rakotomalala, R. (2017). Analyse de corrélation : Étude des dépendances - Variables quantitatives. Suppor de cours. Université Lumière Lyon 2, France.
Rejc, A. (2004). Toward contingency theory of performance measurement. Journal for East European Management Studies, 9(3), 243-264.
Ripsas, S., Schaper, B., & Troger, S. (2015). A startup cockpit for the proof-of-concept. Handbuch Entrepreneurship.
Rompho, N. (2018). Operational performance measures for startups. Measuring Business Excellence, 22(1), 31-41.
SER. (2019). L’innovation et le numérique au Cameroun. Yaoundé: Service économique régional.
Spiegel, O., Abbassi, P., Zylka, M. P., Schlagwein, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2015). Business model development, founders' social capital and the success of early stage internet start-ups: a mixed-method study. Information System Journal.
Suárez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 415-430.
Sulayman, M., Mendes, E., Urquhart, C., Riaz, M., & Tempero, E. (2014). Towards a theoretical framework of SPI success factors for small and medium web companies. Information and Software Technology, 56(7), 807-820.
Tosi, J., & Slocum, J. (1984). Contingency Theory: Some Suggested Directions. Journal of Management, 10(1), 9-26.
Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept - Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49-58.
Vogel, P. (2013). Building and assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. The Hague: LEED Programme Workshop on Entrepreneurial ecosystems and Growth-oriented entrepreneurship.
Wadongo, B., & Abdel-Kader, M. (2014). Contingency theory, performance management and organizational effectiveness in the third sector: a theoretical framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(6), 680-703.
Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66–90.
Zwikael, Pathak, Singh, & Ahmed. (2014). The moderating effect of risk on the relationship between planning and success. International Journal of Project Management, 435-441.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dany R. T. Dombou, Cybele Ewane
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
