The Fisher Separation Theorem And Capital Budgeting Decisions Of Quoted Firms In Nigeria

Authors

  • Omiete Victoria Olulu-Briggs University of Port Harcourt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.92.9735

Keywords:

Fisher’s Theorem, Capital Budgeting, Investment decisions, Performance.

Abstract

This study explored the Fisher separation theorem and capital budgeting decisions of quoted firms on the Nigerian stock exchange. A sample of 60 questionnaires were filled and returned by staffs from particular sectors like manufacturing, health and agriculture.  Descriptive statistics was employed to illustrate the data while the Spearman rank order correlation test was used to determine if a significant relationship exist among the variables. From the estimates, the Net Present Value and Modified Internal Rate of Return are regularly employed by firms in making capital budgeting decisions. Also, when firms employ capital budgeting tools, it creates wealth for both managers and shareholders, providing support for the Fisher’s separation theorem. Finally, a correlation coefficient of 0.827 reflect a positive and linear relationship between capital budgeting decision and Shareholders’ value creation. Thus, an increase in capital budgeting decisions result to an increase in value creation. This outcome is consistent with findings from other economies and previous studies. It thus recommends that firms in the Nigerian environment should ensure they play down on shareholders’ desire for dividends and instead redirect their funds to more investments by employing suitable capital budgeting decisions.

References

Fisher I. Theory of interest: As determined by impatience to spend income and opportunity to invest it. Augustusm Kelly Publishers; 1930.

Bhalla VK. International Financial Management (Text and Cases). S. Chand Publishing; 2014. th

Pandey IM. Financial management. 9 ed. Noida: Vikas Publication House; 1995.

Chartered Professional Accountants, Canada. (Accessed 20 January, 2021). Available: https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/careerand-professional-development/webinars/coreareas/management-accounting/planning-budgeting-andforecasting/capital-budgeting-effectivelyanalyzingbusiness-decisions

O’Sullivan A, Sheffrin SM. Economics: Principles in action. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2003. th

Thompson AA, Strickland AJ. Strategic management concepts and cases. 12 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2001. rd

Seitz N, Ellison MC. Capital budgeting and long-term financing decisions. 3 ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publishers; 1999.

Johnson H. Making capital budgeting decisions: Maximizing the value of the firm. London: Pearson Education Limited; 1999.

Fakhfakh M. The readability of standardized reports by the International Federation of Accountants. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research. 2013; 2(1):10.

Klammer T. The association of capital budgeting techniques with firm performance. The Accounting Review. 1973; 48(2):353-364.

Haka SF, Gordon LA, Pinches GE. Sophisticated capital budgeting selection techniques and firm performance. Accounting for Management Control. 1985; 521-545.

Liberatore MJ, Monahan TF, Stout DE. A framework for integrating capital budgeting analysis with strategy. The Engineering Economist. 1992; 38(1):31-43. DOI:10.1080/00137919208903085

Lohmann JR, Baksh SN. The IRR, NPV and Payback period and their relative performance in common capital budgeting decision procedures for dealing with risk. The Engineering Economist. 1993; 39(1):17-47. DOI:10.1080/00137919308903111

Hajdasiński MM. The payback period as a measure of profitability and liquidity. The Engineering Economist. 1993; 38(3):177-191. DOI:10.1080/00137919308903096 241 Olulu-Briggs, O. V. (2021). The Fisher Separation Theorem and Capital Budgeting Decisions of Quoted Firms in Nigeria. Archives of Business

Jog VM, Srivastava AK. Capital budgeting practices in corporate Canada. Financial practice and education. 1995; 5(2):37-43.

Peel MJ, Bridge J. How planning and capital budgeting improve SME performance. Long range planning. 1998; 31(6):848-856. DOI:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80021-6

Farragher EJ, Kleiman RT, Sahu AP. The association between the use of sophisticated capital budgeting practices and corporate performance. The Engineering Economist. 2001; 46(4):300-311. DOI:10.1080/00137910108967579

Hartman JC, Schafrick IC. The relevant internal rate of return. The Engineering Economist. 2004; 49(2):139-158. DOI:10.1080/00137910490453419

Hajdasinski MM. The internal rate of return (IRR) as a financial indicator. The Engineering Economist. 2004; 49(2):185-197. DOI:10.1080/00137910490453437

Gilbert E. Capital budgeting: A case study analysis of the role of formal evaluation techniques in the decision making process. South African Journal of Accounting Research. 2005; 19(1):19-36.

Block S. Are there differences in capital budgeting procedures between industries? An empirical study. The Engineering Economist. 2006; 50(1):55-67. DOI:10.1080/00137910590916676

Block S. Capital budgeting techniques used by small business firms in the 1990s. The Engineering Economist. 2007; 42(4):289-302. DOI:10.1080/00137919708903184

Chen S. An empirical examination of capital budgeting techniques: impact of investment types and firm characteristics. The Engineering Economist. 2007; 40(2):145-170. DOI:10.1080/00137919508903142

Pike RH. An empirical study of the adoption of sophisticated capital budgeting practices and decisionmaking effectiveness. Accounting and Business Research. 2012; 18(72):341-351.

Al-Mutairi A, Naser K, Saeid M. Capital budgeting practices by non-financial companies listed on Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE). Cogent Economics & Finance. 2018; 6(1):1468232.

Ahmed IE. Factors determining the selection of capital budgeting techniques. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis. 2013; 2(2):77-88.

Al Mutairi ME, Tian GG, Tan A. Corporate finance practice in Kuwait: a survey to confront theory with practice. In 22nd Australasian finance and banking conference. 2009. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.1456750

Alhamoud T, Ibrahim M. The extent of application of managerial accounting techniques by Qatari shareholding companies. Arab Journal of Administrative Sciences. 1997; 4(2):243-269.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16(3):297-334. rd

Baridam DM. Research Method in Administrative Science. 3 ed. Port Harcourt: Sherbrooke press; 2001. th

Sekaran U. Research Methods for Business: A skill-building approach. 4 ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.

Agresti A, Wackerly D, Boyett J. Exact conditional tests for cross-classifications: Approximation of attained significance levels. Psychometrika. 1979; 44:75-84.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Olulu-Briggs, O. V. (2021). The Fisher Separation Theorem And Capital Budgeting Decisions Of Quoted Firms In Nigeria. Archives of Business Research, 9(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.92.9735