Corporate Governance: The Linkage to Firm Performance in Malaysia

Authors

  • Khairi Aseh Tenaga Nasional University Malaysia
  • P. Ravindran Pathmanathan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9272

Abstract

This paper focuses on corporate governance applied in Malaysia and how it contributes to the success of the company. Over recent years, with corporate scandals and the global financial crisis, the new idea of corporate governance has attracted rising scrutiny in the business world. It is viewed as a legal obligation that requires the fostering of the integrity of the law and the delivery of ethical advice. Corporate governance is seen as an significant resource for corporate financial efficiency, and investor investment decisions have become a more serious issue, with the result that the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance assessment has drawn researchers ' attention in established and emerging cities over the last decade. A total of 215 firms on the KLSE (Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange) were listed for this report in 2017. Results have demonstrated that corporate governance indicators have a major effect on company efficiency and business value assessment in general. Through analyzing the structure of the group, the ROA and Tobin q calculation variables had a major positive impact. In comparison, the CEO duality was positively associated with all dependent variables, and the number of board committees was found to be negatively correlated with all calculated variables, and strongly correlated with ROA. The challenges of corporate governance are addressed in the final part of the paper.

References

Abidin, Z., Kamal, N. &Jusoff, K. (2009). Board Structure and Corporate Performance in Malaysia. International Journal Of Economics And Finance, 1(1). doi: 10.5539/ijef.v1n1p150

Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆. Journal Of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Adiloğlu, B. & Vuran, B. (2012). The Relationship Between The Financial Ratios And Transparency Levels Of Financial Information Disclosures Within The Scope Of Corporate Governance: Evidence From Turkey The Journal of Applied Business Research –Volume 28, Number 4

Allam, B. (2018). The Impact of Board Characteristics and Ownership Identity on Agency Costs and Firm Performance: UK Evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal Of Business In Society, 18(6), 1147-1176. doi: 10.1108/cg-09-2016-0184 85

Arif, S. (2012). Kurumsal YönetimEndeksPerformansınınAnalizi, EkonomikveSosyalAraştırmalarDergisi, Cilt:8, Yıl:8, Özel Sayı, 8, 137-154

Bliss, M. (2011). Does CEO Duality Constrain Board Independence ? Some Evidence from Audit Pricing”, Accounting & Finance, 51(2) : 361-380. Bob Tricker Corporate Governance: An International Review, Volume 8, Issue 4, 289–296

Christensen, J., Kent, P. & Stewart, J. (2010). Corporate Governance and Company Performance in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 20(4), 372-386. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00108.x

Claessens, S. Djankov, J. Fan & L. Lang, 2003, When Does Corporate Diversification Matter to Productivity and Performance ? Evidence from East Asia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11 (3), 365-392.

Cretu, R. F., 2012, Corporate Governance and Corporate Diversification Srategies, Revista de Management Comparat International, 13, 621-633.

Ehikioya, B. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance: The International Journal Of Business In Society, 9(3), 231-243. doi: 10.1108/14720700910964307

Habbash, M., &Bajaher, M. S., 2014, An empirical analysis of the impact of board structure on the performance of large Saudi firms. The Business Review, Cambridge, 22(1), 152-158.

Jo, H., &Harjoto, M. (2014). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal Of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53-72. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1

Lam, T. Y. and Lee, S. K., 2012, Family ownership, Board Committees and Firm Performance : Evidence from Hong Kong, Corporate Governance. 12(3): 353-366.

Pillai, R. & Al-Malkawi, H. (2018). On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research In International Business And Finance, 44, 394-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.110

Reddy, K., Locke, S. & Scrimgeour, F. (2010). The Efficacy of Principle-Based Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Financial Performance. International Journal Of Managerial Finance, 6(3), 190-219. doi: 10.1108/17439131011056224

Wruck, K. & Wu, Y. (2008). Relationships, Corporate Governance, and Performance: Evidence from Private Placements of Common Stock. Journal Of Corporate Finance, 15(1), 30-47. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-21

How to Cite

Aseh, K., & Pathmanathan, P. R. (2020). Corporate Governance: The Linkage to Firm Performance in Malaysia. Archives of Business Research, 8(11), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9272

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>