Why Does Momentum Persist?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9312Keywords:
behavioral finance; investment strategies; market efficiency; momentumAbstract
The phenomenon of short-term momentum in intriguing because it directly contradicts the notion that in an efficient market stock prices should lack memory. Three classes of possible explanation for momentum are (1) it is consistent with tenets of efficient markets after appropriate risk adjustment; (2) it is consistent with tenets of behavioral finance because of investors' cognitive biases; and (3) it is consistent with structurally-based positive feedback loops. The presence of extreme bubbles provides evidence against the first explanation. The fact that prices are effectively set by institutional investors who are aware of the cognitive biases in question and have a financial incentive to avoid them provides evidence against the second. Structurally-based explanations include the short-term incentives of institutional money managers and the impact of indexing. We believe that considering structural factors affecting the behavior of stock prices provides an additional perspective, to be used in combination with behavioral finance and market efficiency.
References
Jegadeesh N, Titman S. 1993. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance. 48, 65-91.
Subrahmanyam A. 2018. Equity market momentum: a synthesis of the literature and suggestions for future work. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 51:291-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfiin.2018.08.004.
McLean D, Pontiff J. 2016. Does academic research destroy stock market predictability? Journal of Finance. 71,5-32.
Samsa G. 2014. A new critique of the traditional method for empirically estimating the returns associated with strategies of stock investment: impact of fixing the investment horion. Bentley University Case Studies in Business Industry and Government Statisitis. 5(2): 102-110.
Asness C, Moskowitz T, Pedersen L. 2013. Value and momentum everywhere. Journal of Finance. 68, 929-985.
Johnson TC. 2002. Rational momentum effects. Journal of Finance, 57; 585-608.
Holden CW, Subrahmanyam A. 2002. News events, information acquisition, and serial correlation. Journal of Business. 75; 1-32.
Daniel K, Moskowitz T. Momentum crashes. Journal of Financial Economics. 122, 21-247.
Grinblatt M, Han B. 2005. Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics. 78, 311-339.
Hong H, Stein J. 1999. A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. Journal of Finance. 54, 2143-2184.
Hong H, Stein J, Yu J. 2007. Simple forecasts and paradigm shifts. Journal of Finance. 62, 1207-1242. 124
Da Z, Gurum U, Waracha M. 2014. Frog in the pan: continuous information and momentum. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 2171-2218.
Antoniou C, Doukas J, Subrahmanyam A. 2013. Cognitive dissonance, sentiment, and momentum. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis. 48, 245-275.
Barberis N, Shleifer A, Vishny R. 1998. A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307-343.
Lewellen J. 2002. Momentum and autocorrelation in stock returns. Reviews of Financial Studies. 15, 533-564.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Greg Samsa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
