Resolving the Mark-to Market vs Historical Cost debate: where do we go from here?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.87.8703Keywords:
mark-to-market; historical costs; mark-to-market versus historical costs; accounting information; using accounting information to determine value; using accounting information to evaluate firm performance; using accounting information to evaluate managersAbstract
Mark-to-market accounting has been one of the most hotly debated changes in accounting. Some, including the past Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, cited it as one of the causes of the 2007-2008 U.S. economic crisis. Many in the accounting community disagree with the Chairman and feel that movement away from historical cost has been a positive for transparency. Though countless individuals have voiced either their opposition or their support of mark-to-market accounting, each of them seems to view the debate as one between either historical cost or mark-to-market. After reviewing the arguments for both historical cost and mark-to-market in detail, we conclude the production of two financial statements, a traditional Balance Sheet based on historical costs, and a Statement of Financial Condition based on mark-to-market, would be relatively inexpensive to produce and would better provide the information needed by different users employing said financial information for, invariably, different purposes.
References
Adrian, T. and A. Estrella, “Monetary Tightening Cycles and the Predictability of Economic Activity”, Economics Letters, 2008, 99(2): p. 260-264
Adrian, T. and H.S. Shin, “Liquidity, Monetary Policy, and Financial Cycle”,. Current Issues in Economics & Finance, 2008, 14(1): p. 1-7
Bentson, George J., “The Quality of Corporate Financial Statements and their Auditors Before and After Enron”, Cato Policy Analysis #497. Washington: Cato Institute, ( November 6, 2003)
Black, F. and M. Scholes, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3 (May-June), 1973, pp. 637-654
Bratton, W., W., “Rules, Principles, and the Accounting Crisis in the United States”, European Business Organization Law Review, 2004. 5(1): p. 7
Buffet, W., “Marking to Myth”, Fortune, Aug. 16, 2007; article appearing at: http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0708/gallery.crisiscounsel.fortune/index.html
Coats, W., “Mark to Market Accounting—What are the Issues?”, article appearing at http://www.Cato.org on October 29, 2008
Cunningham, L., “Accounting's Role as Cause and Cure of Crisis”, Georgetown Law Journal, 2008, 1(97)
Forbes, S., “Two Biggest Things Still to Do”, Forbes Magazine, Oct. 13, 2008
Haldeman, R.G., Jr., “Fact, Fiction, and Fair Value Accounting at Enron”, The CPA Journal, 2006, 76(11): p. 14
“How Did We Get Into This Mortgage Mess, and How Do We Get Out?” Panel Discussion at the Princeton Club of New York, April 23, 2008 309
Hutchinson, M., “Why Mark-to-Market is Bad News for Shareholders”, article appearing at on June 4, 2008
Penman, H.S., “Financial Reporting Quality: Is Fair Value a Plus or a Minus?” Accounting and Business Research, 2007. 37(3): p. 33
Wallison, P.J., “Fair Value Accounting: A Critique”, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, July,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Michael Chatham, Jerry Kopf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
