THE EFFECT OF WORK MOTIVATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON PERFORMANCE WITH SATISFACTION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES EDUCATION PERSONNEL REKTORATE ANDALAS UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Dafruddin .
  • Heryanto Heryanto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.72.5768

Keywords:

Work motivation, work environment, job satisfaction, performance

Abstract

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect of work motivation and work environment on performance with satisfaction as an intervening variable of unand rectorate education staff. The population in this study were all unand rectorate education staff totaling 351 people. The technique used in sampling is to use the census method, wich is 187 people. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative.The analysis shows that work motivation has a positive and significant effect on satisfaction of the Unand Rectorate education staff, indicated by significance values t, which equals to 0.001 smaller than α = 0.05 (0.001 <0.05) with a regression coefficient of 0.206. The work environment has a positive and significant effect on employee satisfaction of Unand rectorate education staff, which is indicated by a significance value t of 0,000 smaller than α = 0.05 (0,000 <0,05) with a regression coefficient of 0,374. Motivation work has a positive and significant effect on the performance of Unand rectorate education staff, indicated by a significance value of t of 0,000 smaller than α = 0.05(0,000 <0, 05) with a regression coefficient of 0,319. Work environment is positively and significantly influencial to the performance of the Unand rectorate's education staff, indicated by a significant value t of 0.023 smaller than α = 0.05 (0.023 <0.05) with a regression coefficient of 0.166. Job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect to the performance of the UNAND Rectorate education staff, indicated by the significance value of t is 0,000 smaller than α = 0,05 (0,000 <0,05) with the coefficient regression of 0.390.

References

Dessler, Gery. (2006). Human Resource management, The Strategic Role of human Resource management,10 Edition, Prentice Hall

Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang, BP Undip

Hasibuan, H. Malayu S.P. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hasibuan, H. Malayu S.P. (2011). Organisasi dan Motivasi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara Luthans. F,2006, Prilaku Organisasi, Edisi 10, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta

Mangkunegera, A. Anwar Prabu. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung, Remaja Roesdakarya

Raymond A. Noe, Jhon R. Hollenhec, Barry Gerhart, Patrick M. Wright (2011). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, Fourth Edition, Published by MC Graw-Hill Rivai, vithezal &Segala, E.J, 2009, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta : Rajagrafindo Persada th

Robbins, Stephen P. (2003) Prilaku Organisasi,10 Edition. New Jersy: Prentice Hall

Robbins, Stephen P. (2013) Organizational Behavior, Fiftheen Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall Inc.2005

Robbins, Stepen P. (2006). Prilaku organisasi. Edisi ke 10. Jakarta : Indeks Kelompok gramedia

Sekaran, Uma. (2011). Research Methods for Business: Metode Penelitian Untuk Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sedarmayanti. (2009). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung : Refika Aditama.

Simamora, Hendry. (2006), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia,STIE YKPN. Edisi Ketiga Yogyakarta

Sugiyono.(2011), Metoda Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung, Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-17

How to Cite

., D., & Heryanto, H. (2019). THE EFFECT OF WORK MOTIVATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON PERFORMANCE WITH SATISFACTION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES EDUCATION PERSONNEL REKTORATE ANDALAS UNIVERSITY. Archives of Business Research, 7(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.72.5768

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2