Synergy Of Top Management Team Characteristics, Corporate Governance And Social Responsibility: How Performance Of Large Manufacturing Firms Changed

Authors

  • Julius Ogola Mugwang’a
  • Zachary Bolo Awino
  • Martin Ogutu
  • Jackson Maalu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.66.4737

Abstract

The study examines the joint effect of top management team characteristics, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of large manufacturing firms. The study is guided by the upper echelons, agency, stakeholder and organizational performance theories respectively. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was adopted. The population was all seventy two large manufacturing firms in Kenya. Primary data was collected using structured questionnaire from Chief Executive Officers. This was analysed through descriptive and multiple regression analysis. Results obtained show that the synergy of top management team characteristics, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility account for 47% of the performance of the firm. The results offer applicability and relevance of upper echelon, agency and stakeholder theories in normal organizational operations. While recruiting top managers, the selection board is guided to match the characteristic profiles of candidates against the members of the existing management team. In practice, firms attain superior performance if they incorporated good corporate governance with an independent board chairman, specialized board committees, and more outside directors on their boards.  Organizations should mainstream corporate social responsibility practices that are consistent with expected societal expectations to stimulate higher performance. Policy makers are encouraged to be support manpower development, encourage improvement in governance and emphasize moral organizational value system as part of institutional conditions that impact on manufacturing performance in the local context as they formulate policies to aid competiveness of the sector projected in Kenya Vision 2030.  The empirical testing in this paper adds to the scholarly knowledge by providing evidence on the synergistic effect of top management characteristics, corporate governance and social responsibility on firm performance. It goes further to contribute to literature on upper echelons theory, agency theory, stakeholder theory and organizational performance theory.

References

Amihud, Y., Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics 12: 605–617.

Boyd, B.K., (1994) Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1994), pp. 335-344

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M, Ellstrand, & A. E, Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3): 269 – 290.

Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T. & Dalton, C. M. (2007). ‘The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: independence, equity and the market for corporate control’. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 1–64.

Eisenhardt, K. M., (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research The Academy of Management Review Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 532-550

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations. Minneapolis, West Publishing.

Freedman, M. & Stagliano, A. (1991).Differences in Social Cost Disclosures: A Market Test of Investor Reaction. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4 (1), 68- 83.

Godfrey, M., Townsend, J. and Denby, T. (2004) Building a good life for older people in local communities: The experience of ageing in time and place, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelon: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers. Academy on Management Review, 9, 193-206.

Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West, 1978.

Jo, H. and Harjoto, M. (2011) ‘Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of Corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3): 351-83.

Keong, L.C. (2002). Corporate governance: An Asia-Pacific Critique. Hong Kong, Sweet & Maxwell Asia.

Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., & Erkut, S. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: why three or more women enhance governance (pp. p.74): Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley College.

Lepak, D., Susan, M., Tekleab, Amanuel, Marrone, A.J., & Cohen, D. (2007). An examination of the use of highinvestment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management. 46. 223-246. 10.1002/hrm.20158.

Li-Jen He, Chao-Jung Chen and Hsiang - Tsai Chiang. (2015). Top Manager Background Characteristics, Family Control and Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Performance Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, 71-86ISSN: 1792-6580 (print version), 1792-6599 (online)Scienpress Ltd, 2015.

Margolis, J. D, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinkingsocial initiatives by business.Admin. Sci.

McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127. nd Monks, A. G. & Minow, N. 2001. Corporate governance. 2 edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Business.

Mutuku, C., K'Obonyo P, Awino, Z.B. & Musyoka, M. (2013). Top management team diversity, involvement culture and performance of commercial banks in Kenya. DBA Africa Management Review, 3(2), 70-80.

Shafer, W., K. Fukukawa., and G. Lee. (2007). Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics 70(3): 265-284.

Shane, P., Spicer, B. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. Accounting Review, 58 (3), 521–538.

Sherer, P.D. & Leblebici, H. (2001) Bring variety and change into strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20:199-230.

Swaen, G. G., Teggeler, O. Van Amelsvoort, L. G. False positive outcomes and design characteristics in occupational cancer epidemiology studies. int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct; 30(5):948-54

Swanson, D.L. (2008). Top managers as drivers for corporate social responsibility. In The Oxford Handbook of Social Responsibility, Eds Crane, McWilliams, Matten, Moon and Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waddock, S. A. & Samuel B. G. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303-319.

Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 117-131.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-23

How to Cite

Mugwang’a, J. O., Awino, Z. B., Ogutu, M., & Maalu, J. (2018). Synergy Of Top Management Team Characteristics, Corporate Governance And Social Responsibility: How Performance Of Large Manufacturing Firms Changed. Archives of Business Research, 6(6), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.66.4737

Most read articles by the same author(s)