Symbolic Consumption in the Indian Markets: Analysis of Determining Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.64.4474Keywords:
Symbolic Consumption, STP, Marketing mix, BrandsAbstract
Researchers have tried hard to understand the concept of symbolic consumption and more precisely the reasons for symbolic consumption as it is one of the central issues of concern around which the marketing strategy for many products revolves. There are many products being purchased for the symbolic value they carry, rather than the functional value or the utilitarian value of the product. Researchers classified the needs into functional, emotional and symbolic needs. While the lesser known and understood facts about symbolic consumption and the changing behaviour of consumers are being worked upon by various researches, the constant change in the pattern of this behaviour makes it difficult for researchers to stick to a particular stream and area of research. The term symbolic consumption is used to describe the phenomenon whereby people consume to reflect their sense of self-identity. Symbolic consumption has been addressed primarily not only in consumer studies, but also in anthropology, sociology, economics, marketing, human ecology, and social psychology. Over the period, consumers have constantly changed their perceptions and notions regarding branded products and their value. The driving factors that make the consumer consume or not a particular product are varied and influence the process in various possible combinations of these individual factors.
Questions regarding why a product is purchased by a group of people, the recurrence of its purchase or why a product is selected over the others have always been revolving in the minds of marketing groups and researchers. This paper analyses the theoretical aspects of the determinants of the constantly varying consumer behaviour in indulging in symbolic consumption of brands in the Indian scenario with a focus on the determinants which affect the consumer in their buying decision are examined.
References
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. and Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656.
Balakrishnan, M. S. (2009). Strategic branding of destinations: a framework. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 611-629.
Belen del Rio, A., Vazquez, R. and Iglesias, V. (2001). The role of the brand name in obtaining differential advantages. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(7), 452- 465.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possession and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139-168.
Bhat, S. and Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 32-43.
Blankson, C. and Kalafatis, S. P. (2007). Congruence between Positioning and Brand Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(1), 79-94.
Burke, M. C. and Edell, J. A. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 69-83.
Chen, T., Kalra, A. and Sun, B. (2009). Why Do Consumers Buy Extended Service Contracts? Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 611-623.
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R. and Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72, 48-63.
Chon, K. S. (1992). Self-image/destination image congruity. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 360-363.
Chronis, A. and Hampton, R. (2002). Theory building for experiential consumption: The use of the phenomenological tradition to analyze international tourism. American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings.
Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer), 92-101.
Khan, U. and Dhar, R. (2010). Price-Framing Effects on the Purchase of Hedonic and Utilitarian Bundles. Joumal of Marketing Research, 47, 1090 –1099.
Levav, J. and McGraw, P. (2009). Emotional Accounting: How Feelings About Money Influence Consumer Choice. Joumal of Marketing Research, 46, 66-80.
Liang, C.-J. and Wang, W.-H. (2004). Attributes, benefits, customer satisfaction and behavioral loyalty - an integrative research of financial services industry in Taiwan Journal of Services Research, 4(1), 54-91.
Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N. and Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77, 39-56.
Orth, U. R., McGarry Wolf, M., et al. (2005). Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(2), 88-97.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., et al. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing, 50(October), 135-145.
Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127-146.
Sweeney, J. and Soutar, G. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Tsai, S.-p. (2005a). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 429-454. Tsai, S.-p. (2005b). Utility, cultural symbolism and emotion: A comprehensive model of brand purchase value. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 227- 291.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R. and Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310- 320.
Zajonc, R. and Hazel, M. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123-131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Archives of Business Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.